CPI, CPI-M protest at ECI over SIR, demand CEC Gyanesh Kumar's ouster
Synopsis
Key Takeaways
Members of Left parties, including the Communist Party of India (CPI) and the Communist Party of India (Marxist) (CPI-M), staged a demonstration outside the Election Commission of India (ECI) office in New Delhi on Tuesday, 29 September 2026, demanding the resignation of Chief Election Commissioner (CEC) Gyanesh Kumar over the ongoing Special Intensive Revision (SIR) of electoral rolls. The protest is part of a widening Opposition mobilisation that has drawn in Congress, civil society groups, and now a Supreme Court petition scheduled for hearing next week.
What the Left Parties Said
CPI-M leader Brinda Karat alleged that nearly 13 crore citizens had been struck off the voter list under the SIR exercise. 'Right now, almost 13 crore citizens of our country have been removed from the voter list. The situation made right now is worse than during the British era,' she said. CPI-M General Secretary M.A. Baby went further, declaring: 'Gyanesh Kumar cannot continue; we will not allow him to continue.'
Congress Escalates Pressure on the CEC
Congress President Mallikarjun Kharge, addressing the Congress Working Committee (CWC) meeting on the same day, demanded the immediate removal of Gyanesh Kumar, citing alleged irregularities in the SIR. Kharge also called on Prime Minister Narendra Modi to resign on moral grounds over what the party described as undue pressure on the poll panel chief. The Congress signalled it would take the campaign to the streets and to Parliament. This follows nationwide Congress-led protests on 25 September 2026, at which civil society organisations held parallel demonstrations in Delhi and several states.
Internal Rifts Within the ECI
The controversy deepened after a leading national daily reported that Election Commissioners Sukhbir Singh Sandhu and Vivek Joshi had reportedly raised objections on at least 14 occasions over decisions and orders related to the SIR during the past 10 months. According to the report, the two commissioners alleged that certain decisions were taken without their knowledge or recommendation — a charge that, if accurate, would point to serious procedural lapses at the apex electoral body. The ECI, however, has maintained that all SIR-related decisions were taken in accordance with the law and has characterised the differences as part of its internal deliberations.
Supreme Court to Hear Challenge Next Week
The Supreme Court on Tuesday agreed to list, for hearing next week, a petition challenging the functioning of the CEC and questioning the legality of the nationwide SIR. The judicial intervention adds a new dimension to what has so far been a political and street-level campaign, potentially subjecting the SIR's legal basis to independent scrutiny. Notably, the court's decision to take up the matter signals that constitutional questions around the revision exercise are now formally in play.
What Comes Next
With the Supreme Court set to hear the petition, the Opposition ramping up its parliamentary strategy, and internal discord at the ECI now publicly acknowledged, the SIR controversy shows no signs of abating. The outcome of next week's hearing could determine whether the revision exercise continues in its current form or is subject to fresh safeguards.