Why is Sony Music Refusing to Share Revenue Details with Ilaiyaraaja?

Click to start listening
Why is Sony Music Refusing to Share Revenue Details with Ilaiyaraaja?

Synopsis

In a startling legal battle, Sony Music has declined to share critical revenue details with music icon R. Ilaiyaraaja, citing confidentiality issues. This pivotal case raises questions about transparency in the music industry and the rights of artists over their own compositions. Stay tuned as we delve deeper into this unfolding drama.

Key Takeaways

  • Sony Music has refused to disclose revenue details to Ilaiyaraaja.
  • The case highlights issues of transparency in the music industry.
  • Confidentiality claims are at the center of the legal dispute.
  • The Supreme Court is involved in determining the direction of the case.
  • The next hearing is scheduled for November 27, 2025.

Chennai, Oct 22 (NationPress) In a dramatic development in the ongoing legal conflict between music legend R. Ilaiyaraaja and Sony Music Entertainment India Private Limited, the company on Wednesday chose not to provide the artist with the account statement that outlines revenue generated from the commercial utilization of his musical works.

The matter was reviewed by Justice N. Senthilkumar at the Madras High Court. Representing Sony Music, senior counsel Vijay Narayan stated that while the account statement had been presented in a sealed cover for the judge’s evaluation, it could not be disclosed to Ilaiyaraaja or his legal team due to the inclusion of confidential commercial data, such as earnings from platforms like Apple Music, Amazon Music, and Spotify.

He argued that Ilaiyaraaja must first establish his legal entitlement over the songs in question, which were composed for films for which he had already received payments from the producers.

Countering this, senior counsel S. Prabakaran, who represents Ilaiyaraaja, pointed out that the Supreme Court has consistently criticized the practice of submitting documents in sealed covers.

He urged the court to instruct Sony Music to reveal the details publicly, claiming that withholding such information obstructs transparency in judicial processes.

However, Justice Senthilkumar opted against unsealing the document at this point.

The court learned that Sony Music had previously approached the Supreme Court to transfer Ilaiyaraaja’s lawsuit from the Madras High Court to the Bombay High Court, where the company had filed a related civil suit in 2021, asserting itself as the rightful copyright owner of certain songs composed by the esteemed artist.

This case also seeks to prevent Ilaiyaraaja from claiming commercial rights over those works. Vijay Narayan further informed the court that a Supreme Court Bench, including Chief Justice B.R. Gavai and Justice K. Vinod Chandran, had issued notice to Ilaiyaraaja on October 15, 2025, with a hearing for the transfer plea scheduled for November 26.

In light of this, Justice Senthilkumar remarked that High Courts typically avoid proceeding with cases awaiting transfer before the apex court.

Consequently, the judge instructed the registry to schedule Ilaiyaraaja’s case for further proceedings on November 27, 2025, following the Supreme Court’s ruling on the transfer request. The account statement submitted by Sony Music will remain sealed until that time.

Point of View

It's essential to recognize the complexities surrounding artist rights in the music industry. This ongoing case reflects broader issues of transparency and accountability that affect not only Ilaiyaraaja but artists across India. The resolution of this dispute could set important precedents for the future of music rights.
NationPress
22/10/2025

Frequently Asked Questions

Why did Sony Music refuse to disclose revenue details?
Sony Music cited confidentiality concerns, claiming that the revenue details include sensitive commercial information.
What is the significance of the sealed cover?
The sealed cover contains Sony Music's statement of accounts, which the company argues cannot be shared due to its confidential nature.
What is Ilaiyaraaja's stance on this issue?
Ilaiyaraaja's legal team argues for transparency, claiming that withholding information undermines judicial transparency.
What are the implications of this case?
The outcome could set important precedents regarding artist rights and the disclosure of financial information in the music industry.
When is the next hearing scheduled?
The next hearing is set for November 27, 2025, following a Supreme Court decision on the transfer plea.
Nation Press