Why is Shri Ram Swabhiman Parishad Supporting Arrested Influencer Sharmistha Panoli?
Click to start listening
Synopsis
Sharmistha Panoli, a law student and influencer, has been arrested over a controversial post regarding Operation Sindoor. In response, the Shri Ram Swabhiman Parishad has rallied for her support, raising questions about freedom of expression and religious sentiments. This case highlights the ongoing debate over social media's role in sensitive issues.
Key Takeaways
- Sharmistha Panoli's arrest highlights ongoing debates about freedom of expression.
- The Shri Ram Swabhiman Parishad stands firmly in support of her rights.
- The incident has drawn attention to the role of social media in sensitive discussions.
- The Sky Foundation is being scrutinized for its involvement in the case.
- Public reaction underscores the need for balanced dialogue on religion and expression.
Kolkata, May 31 (NationPress) The Shri Ram Swabhiman Parishad has shown unwavering support for Sharmistha Panoli, a law student and social media influencer recently detained by Kolkata Police for reportedly offending religious sentiments through her posts regarding Operation Sindoor.
Suraj Kumar Singh, Secretary of the Parishad, spoke to a crowd outside Alipur Court, denouncing the arrest and emphasizing the organization's dedication to Sharmistha's safety and the pursuit of justice.
In an interview with IANS, he stated that despite her public apology, she continued to endure threats and was unjustly targeted.
Singh remarked, "Sharmistha made a statement that ignited controversy. She later apologized unconditionally. Nonetheless, individuals linked with the Sky Foundation, based in Karachi, Pakistan, filed FIRs against her and called for her arrest. They even issued death threats, chanting slogans like 'Sar Tan Se Juda'."
He further criticized the West Bengal government's response to the situation, asserting, "If she has indeed broken Section 295A of BNS, then legal procedures should follow. However, as Hindus and members of our organization, we stand by her. Should anything happen to her, Mamata Banerjee's police will be held accountable. West Bengal has turned into a sanctuary for those who insult Hindus while targeting our own people."
Singh also demanded an investigation into the Sky Foundation, insisting, "This organization, registered in Karachi, is functioning here. Their operations should be scrutinized. We will ensure Sharmistha's safety and support her family and legal team."
Earlier, Panoli was apprehended in Gurugram and subsequently transported to Kolkata on transit remand. She was presented at Alipur Court and placed in judicial custody for 13 days.
An FIR against her was filed at Garden Reach Police Station on May 15 for posting an Instagram video that allegedly offended religious sentiments.
Despite removing the video and issuing a public apology, she faced threats and was ultimately arrested. This case has ignited extensive discussion over freedom of expression and the management of sensitive topics on social media.
Point of View
The situation surrounding Sharmistha Panoli's arrest underscores the delicate balance between freedom of expression and the respect for religious sentiments. In an increasingly polarized environment, it is crucial for authorities to navigate these issues with caution, ensuring that justice prevails while upholding democratic values.
NationPress
21/07/2025
Frequently Asked Questions
What led to Sharmistha Panoli's arrest?
Sharmistha Panoli was arrested for allegedly hurting religious sentiments through her social media posts related to Operation Sindoor, resulting in an FIR filed against her.
What is the position of Shri Ram Swabhiman Parishad regarding her arrest?
The Shri Ram Swabhiman Parishad has expressed strong support for Sharmistha Panoli and condemned her arrest, calling for her safety and justice.
What actions has the organization called for?
The organization has called for an investigation into the Sky Foundation, which is linked to the FIRs filed against Sharmistha, as well as for her legal protection.
How has the public reacted to this case?
The case has sparked widespread debate over freedom of expression and the treatment of sensitive issues on social media, with many rallying for Sharmistha's rights.
What are the implications of this case?
This case raises significant questions about the limits of free speech in India, especially concerning religious sentiments and social media activity.
