Has History Forgotten Jagan's 'Betrayal' in the VP Election?
Click to start listening
Synopsis
In a powerful critique, AICC leader Manickam Tagore accuses Y.S. Jagan Mohan Reddy of betraying the people of Andhra Pradesh by supporting the NDA candidate in the Vice-Presidential election. His statements raise critical questions about political loyalty and the implications for the state's future. Discover the unfolding political drama.
Key Takeaways
- Manickam Tagore's strong condemnation of Jagan Mohan Reddy.
- Accusations of political betrayal regarding the Vice-Presidential election.
- Concerns about the welfare of Andhra Pradesh's farmers.
- Criticism of Jagan's alignment with NDA over state interests.
- Political decisions affecting public trust and governance.
Amaravati, Sep 9 (NationPress) AICC in-charge of Andhra Pradesh Manickam Tagore has criticized former Chief Minister and YSR Congress Party leader Y. S. Jagan Mohan Reddy for his support of the NDA during the Vice-Presidential election, asserting that history will not overlook his “betrayal”.
“By endorsing a candidate backed by the RSS for Vice President, he has prioritized his fear of CBI investigations over the welfare of Andhra Pradesh. This is not merely a tactical move; it reflects a surrender—yielding to the pressures of Modi and Babu rather than aligning with democratic principles,” Tagore expressed on the social media platform 'X'.
“Jagan's actions today will be remembered as the moment he prioritized personal safety over the people's mandate. The people of Andhra deserved bravery, but he chose weakness. When leaders bow to Delhi out of fear, they betray the trust of their constituents. Jagan will be remembered not as a champion, but as a politician who sacrificed his integrity to evade the CBI. His MPs conducted a mock vote and informed us they were instructed by Jagan to support Babu's candidate,” the Congress MP added.
Tagore also commented on the interim bail of YSRCP MP Midhun Reddy in the liquor case. The MP received bail from the ACB court in Vijayawada to allow him to vote in the Vice-Presidential election.
“The TDP/BJP government was so anxious that they filed the liquor case and had him detained. Now, with interim bail, he is momentarily free—not because justice prevailed, but to fulfill his voting duty in the Vice Presidential election,” Tagore stated.
“The real question remains: Will he vote for the TDP/BJP candidate who incarcerated him? Or will he support Justice Sudharsan Reddy, who is dedicated to defending the Constitution?” Tagore remarked.
In another post, Tagore condemned Jagan for “aligning with BJP-RSS in Delhi” instead of standing with the farmers of Andhra Pradesh who are facing a urea shortage. He labeled this a “betrayal” of the farmers of the state.
Point of View
It’s essential to approach this political controversy with an unbiased perspective. The claims made by Manickam Tagore highlight the complexities of political alliances and their impact on state governance. The discourse around Jagan's decisions reflects broader themes of loyalty and accountability in politics—issues that resonate across the nation.
NationPress
09/09/2025
Frequently Asked Questions
What did Manickam Tagore accuse Y.S. Jagan Mohan Reddy of?
Manickam Tagore accused Y.S. Jagan Mohan Reddy of betraying the people of Andhra Pradesh by supporting the NDA candidate in the Vice-Presidential election.
How did Tagore describe Jagan's support for the NDA candidate?
Tagore described Jagan's support as a surrender to pressures from Modi and Babu, prioritizing personal safety over democratic principles.
What was the context of YSRCP MP Midhun Reddy's bail?
Midhun Reddy was released on interim bail to allow him to vote in the Vice-Presidential election, which Tagore criticized as politically motivated.
What concerns did Tagore raise about farmers in Andhra Pradesh?
Tagore criticized Jagan for aligning with the BJP-RSS instead of supporting farmers suffering from a urea shortage, labeling it a betrayal.
What are the broader implications of this political drama?
The controversy raises critical questions about political integrity, accountability, and the future of governance in Andhra Pradesh.
