Trinamool Congress faces split threat: 50 MLAs unhappy, Shiv Sena parallel grows
Synopsis
Key Takeaways
The All India Trinamool Congress (TMC) in West Bengal is confronting what political observers are calling its 'Shiv Sena moment' — a deepening internal crisis triggered by the party's significant electoral losses to the Bharatiya Janata Party (BJP) in early May 2025. Reports of organised dissent, low-attendance party meetings, and alleged 'secret gatherings' of disgruntled legislators have pushed speculation of a formal party split from whisper to mainstream political discourse.
The Numbers That Matter
Under India's Tenth Schedule — the anti-defection law — a split is legally protected only if at least two-thirds of a party's legislative strength breaks away together. For the Trinamool, whose assembly strength has already slipped to 78 MLAs following the expulsion of two members, that threshold stands at approximately 53 legislators. Reports indicate that around 50 MLAs are currently aggrieved with the party leadership — just three short of the number required to execute a legally insulated split.
The two expelled MLAs had reportedly exposed alleged fraudulent signatures on a party resolution nominating names for the posts of Leader of Opposition, two Deputy Leaders of the Opposition, and the party's Chief Whip in the West Bengal Assembly. Their removal has further strained relations within the rank and file.
The Shiv Sena and NCP Precedent
The comparison to Maharashtra's political upheavals of 2022–2023 is not incidental. In both the Shiv Sena and Nationalist Congress Party (NCP) cases, breakaway factions led by Eknath Shinde and Ajit Pawar respectively were recognised by the Election Commission of India (ECI) as the 'original' parties — along with their election symbols — because they commanded a legislative majority, not because they held the party's founding legacy.
Under the Election Symbols Order, 1968, the ECI determines which faction of a split party inherits the official symbol. The Commission weighs legislative numbers as well as control over the party's organisational structure — office bearers, committees, and state units. Where no clear majority exists, the symbol may be frozen and new ones assigned to each faction pending resolution. This institutional mechanism is now directly relevant to the Trinamool's situation.
Historical Parallel: The Congress Split of 1969
India's political history offers another instructive case. In 1969, the Indian National Congress split after the expulsion of Indira Gandhi, giving rise to Congress (Organisation). Gandhi's faction — Congress (I) — ultimately prevailed not through organisational control but through decisive electoral victories, demonstrating that mass appeal and charismatic leadership can override structural disadvantage. Supporters of Mamata Banerjee, the 71-year-old founder of the Trinamool Congress, point to this precedent as reason not to write off her political resilience.
BJP Rules Out Absorbing Defectors
A key variable in any potential split scenario is where defecting TMC legislators would go. The BJP in West Bengal has, as of now, ruled out welcoming turncoats from the Trinamool. This means any MLA choosing to leave would need to build or join a parallel political platform rather than fold into the ruling party's structure — a considerably higher-risk proposition that could deter fence-sitters.
What Comes Next for Mamata Banerjee
Party meetings have reportedly seen unusually low attendance, with at least one session cancelled for want of a quorum. Accounts of legislators meeting outside official channels have added to the atmosphere of institutional erosion. Notably, the dissatisfaction appears rooted in post-poll recriminations rather than ideological divergence — a pattern that historically proves harder to manage than policy disagreements.
Whether the Trinamool's internal crisis crystallises into a formal split will depend on whether the number of aggrieved MLAs crosses the critical 53-legislator threshold and whether an alternative leadership structure emerges. For now, Banerjee retains the founder's advantage — but the institutional clock, as Maharashtra showed, does not wait for political sentiment to catch up.