Vijay-Sangeetha divorce: Chengalpattu court adjourns case to August 7
Synopsis
Key Takeaways
The divorce proceedings between Tamil Nadu Chief Minister and Tamilaga Vettri Kazhagam (TVK) President C. Joseph Vijay and his wife Sangeetha were adjourned once again on Monday, 15 June, after neither party appeared before the Chengalpattu Family Court. The case has now been posted for the next hearing on 7 August.
What Happened in Court
When the matter came up for hearing, both Vijay and Sangeetha remained absent from the courtroom. Their respective legal counsels appeared on their behalf and made submissions before the presiding judge, who subsequently adjourned the matter to 7 August. This marks yet another in a series of postponements that have characterised the high-profile matrimonial dispute in recent months.
Why Neither Party Has Appeared
According to sources familiar with the proceedings, requests have been made to the court seeking permission for both parties to participate via video conferencing. The plea reportedly cited security concerns and logistical challenges stemming from Vijay's role as Chief Minister, as well as the intense public scrutiny surrounding the case. During earlier hearings, too, both sides were represented solely by their lawyers, who cited difficulties in attending physically.
Background: How the Case Began
Sangeetha filed the divorce petition before the Chengalpattu Family Court in December 2025, seeking dissolution of her marriage with Vijay on grounds of irreconcilable differences. Her petition also sought alimony and requested permission to continue residing at the couple's home in Neelankarai, Chennai. The court had previously deferred the matter to 15 June after considering submissions from both sides, but Monday's non-appearance prevented any substantive progress.
Political and Public Attention
The case has attracted considerable media and political attention owing to Vijay's prominence as the head of the TVK and as the sitting Chief Minister of Tamil Nadu. Every development — including each adjournment — has been closely tracked by political observers. Notably, this is the latest in a pattern of repeated deferrals, with the proceedings now set to resume nearly two months after Monday's aborted hearing. The court is expected to consider the next procedural steps when the matter is taken up on 7 August.