PMAY-U 2.0: Andhra govt sought zero houses for Amaravati poor, says YSRCP

Share:
Audio Loading voice…
PMAY-U 2.0: Andhra govt sought zero houses for Amaravati poor, says YSRCP

Synopsis

Parliamentary replies have handed YSRCP a pointed political weapon: Andhra Pradesh submitted housing proposals for 107 urban bodies under PMAY-U 2.0 but not a single one for Amaravati. With ₹882.32 crore in central funding flowing to the rest of the state, the capital's exclusion is now a matter of public record — and the Naidu government has yet to explain why.

Key Takeaways

YSRCP alleged on 30 July that the Andhra Pradesh government sought zero houses under PMAY-U 2.0 for the Amaravati Capital Region .
Parliamentary replies confirmed the Centre sanctions homes based solely on state proposals — placing accountability on the state government.
Andhra Pradesh secured approval for 61,084 houses with ₹882.32 crore in central aid for other urban areas.
At the 17 June 2026 CSMC meeting, another 12,370 houses worth ₹185.55 crore were sanctioned across 107 urban local bodies — Amaravati excluded.
YSRCP demanded that Chief Minister Chandrababu Naidu and Minister Nara Lokesh explain the omission publicly.

The YSR Congress Party (YSRCP) on Thursday, 30 July alleged that the Chandrababu Naidu-led coalition government in Andhra Pradesh deliberately excluded Amaravati from housing proposals under the Pradhan Mantri Awas Yojana-Urban (PMAY-U) 2.0, even as the state secured central approval for tens of thousands of homes in other urban areas. The charge follows parliamentary replies that, according to the opposition party, place the omission on record.

What Parliament Revealed

Replies furnished by the Ministry of Housing and Urban Affairs to questions raised by YSRCP MPs Maddila Gurumoorthy in the Lok Sabha and Meda Raghunath Reddy in the Rajya Sabha confirmed that the Andhra Pradesh government did not submit a single proposal for housing in the Amaravati Capital Region under PMAY-U 2.0. The Centre reiterated that sanctions under the scheme are based entirely on proposals submitted by state governments — meaning the exclusion originated in Amaravati, not New Delhi.

Scale of Approvals Elsewhere in the State

The contrast drawn by YSRCP is sharp. According to the parliamentary reply, Andhra Pradesh had already secured approval for 61,084 houses under PMAY-U 2.0 with central assistance of ₹882.32 crore. At the latest Central Sanctioning and Monitoring Committee meeting held on 17 June 2026, a further 12,370 houses were sanctioned for 107 urban local bodies across the state, drawing an additional ₹185.55 crore in central funding. Amaravati, the state capital, was absent from all these proposals.

YSRCP's Allegations Against the TDP Government

The opposition party alleged that the omission reflects a deliberate policy rather than an administrative oversight. It questioned why proposals could be submitted for 107 towns and cities while the capital alone was kept out. YSRCP claimed this exposed what it described as the Naidu government's vision of Amaravati as a city designed for wealthy investors and real estate interests rather than workers, daily wage earners, and weaker sections. The party also named Minister Nara Lokesh, demanding a public explanation for the exclusion.

The Government's Position

The Chandrababu Naidu administration has repeatedly stated that Amaravati is being developed as an inclusive, world-class capital for all residents of Andhra Pradesh. The government has not yet issued a formal response to the specific parliamentary data cited by YSRCP. The Centre's stated position — that PMAY-U 2.0 sanctions follow state proposals — effectively shifts accountability for the omission to the state government.

Wider Context

Amaravati's development has been a politically charged issue in Andhra Pradesh since the state's bifurcation in 2014. The capital project was stalled under the previous YSRCP government and revived after the Telugu Desam Party (TDP)-led coalition returned to power. Critics have long argued that land acquisition patterns around Amaravati disproportionately benefited landowners and real estate developers. The latest parliamentary data, if accurate, adds a fresh dimension to that long-running debate. How the Naidu government responds — and whether it moves to include Amaravati in future PMAY-U 2.0 proposals — will be closely watched.

Point of View

If unrectified, will make that narrative harder to shake. The more consequential question is not political but administrative: will the state now file a revised proposal for Amaravati, and if so, what delayed it in the first place?
NationPress
30 Jul 2026

Frequently Asked Questions

What did YSRCP allege about PMAY housing in Amaravati?
YSRCP alleged that the Chandrababu Naidu-led Andhra Pradesh government did not submit a single proposal for housing under PMAY-U 2.0 for the Amaravati Capital Region, even as 73,454 homes were approved for other urban areas across the state. The party said parliamentary replies placed this omission on official record.
What did the parliamentary replies reveal about PMAY-U 2.0 in Andhra Pradesh?
Replies from the Ministry of Housing and Urban Affairs confirmed that Andhra Pradesh secured approval for 61,084 houses with ₹882.32 crore in central assistance, and a further 12,370 houses worth ₹185.55 crore for 107 urban local bodies at the 17 June 2026 CSMC meeting — none of which covered Amaravati.
Why does the Centre say Amaravati was excluded from PMAY-U 2.0?
The Union Government clarified that PMAY-U 2.0 sanctions are based entirely on proposals submitted by state governments. Since Andhra Pradesh did not submit any proposal for Amaravati, no houses were sanctioned there — making the state government directly responsible for the exclusion.
Who raised this issue in Parliament?
YSRCP MP Maddila Gurumoorthy raised the question in the Lok Sabha, while Meda Raghunath Reddy raised it in the Rajya Sabha. The replies from the Ministry of Housing and Urban Affairs formed the basis of YSRCP's allegations.
What has the Andhra Pradesh government said in response?
As of the time of reporting, the Chandrababu Naidu government had not issued a formal response to the specific parliamentary data cited by YSRCP. The government has previously maintained that Amaravati is being developed as an inclusive capital for all residents of the state.
Nation Press
The Trail

Connected Dots

Tracing the thread behind this story — newest first.

8 Dots
  1. Latest 1 month ago
  2. 1 month ago
  3. 2 months ago
  4. 3 months ago
  5. 8 months ago
  6. 8 months ago
  7. 1 year ago
  8. 1 year ago
Google Prefer NP
On Google