Cricket Australia rules out new sandpaper scandal probe despite Khawaja, Warner claims

Share:
Audio Loading voice…
Cricket Australia rules out new sandpaper scandal probe despite Khawaja, Warner claims

Synopsis

Eight years after Cape Town, Cricket Australia's CEO has slammed the door on reopening the sandpaper inquiry — even as Usman Khawaja's new book, corroborated by David Warner and Chadd Sayers, alleges the tampering started a Test earlier and involved more players than the three who were punished. The establishment is holding the line; the players' accounts are fracturing it.

Key Takeaways

Cricket Australia CEO Todd Greenberg ruled out reopening the 2018 Cape Town ball-tampering investigation on 10 November 2026 .
Usman Khawaja's autobiography Sabr alleges sandpaper was also used in the Port Elizabeth Test and that more players were involved than the three sanctioned.
David Warner described Khawaja's account as '100% accurate' ; former bowler Chadd Sayers also backed the claims.
Greenberg said players he spoke to had a 'very, very different version of events' and expected their position to remain unchanged.
Greenberg admitted he had not yet read Khawaja's book but confirmed Khawaja had contacted him directly.
Australia captain Pat Cummins , Mitchell Starc , and Mitchell Marsh are all expected to address the controversy publicly in the coming days.

Cricket Australia chief executive Todd Greenberg on 10 November 2026 ruled out reopening the investigation into the 2018 Cape Town ball-tampering scandal, declaring the governing body's position unchanged despite fresh revelations from batter Usman Khawaja and former opener David Warner. Greenberg said the CA board saw no value in revisiting an inquiry conducted eight years ago.

Greenberg's Position

Greenberg, who was not part of Cricket Australia's administration in 2018, argued that conflicting accounts from members of the Australian dressing room made it impossible to establish a common version of events. He emphasised that the organisation was focused on moving forward rather than second-guessing decisions taken under its previous leadership.

'There's absolutely no benefit in going back,' Greenberg told SEN radio. 'That's the clear position of the CA board. I think it's time we've got to look ahead, and the matter was dealt with under a previous leadership back in 2018. And you know, trying to second guess decisions from a previous time, or making an assessment through the prism of hindsight, it's not something we want to do.'

What Khawaja and Warner Alleged

The renewed scrutiny follows the publication of Khawaja's autobiography, Sabr, in which the Australia batter devoted an entire chapter to the ball-tampering episode. Khawaja alleged that involvement in the plan extended beyond the three players originally sanctioned — Warner, Steve Smith, and Cameron Bancroft — and claimed that sandpaper had also been used during the second Test against South Africa in Port Elizabeth, before the incident became public in Cape Town.

Khawaja also questioned the original inquiry, revealing that he was never interviewed despite sitting alongside Bancroft throughout the Cape Town Test. Warner subsequently endorsed Khawaja's account, describing it as '100% accurate', while former Australia fast bowler Chadd Sayers also backed the revelations in a television interview. Notably, the corroboration from multiple figures represents the most concerted challenge yet to the official 2018 findings.

CA's Counter and Conflicting Accounts

Greenberg confirmed he had spoken to several players present in Cape Town and that their recollections differed markedly from Khawaja's version. Having served as Australian Cricketers' Association chief executive from 2020 to 2025, he said he had examined the transcripts of the original investigation as well.

'I can assure you, there are lots of other players who have a very, very different version of events, and they've made that very public from the very start in 2018,' Greenberg said. He added that his conversations with those players over the weekend suggested their position would not change, leaving the matter at the same impasse it has occupied since the scandal broke.

Greenberg admitted he had not yet read Khawaja's book, though he confirmed that Khawaja had contacted him directly. He reiterated that CA remained satisfied with the conclusions of the earlier inquiry and saw no compelling grounds for another investigation. 'We have said we're comfortable with the outcome of the investigation based on the information we've received, that includes what we've seen from Usman and our position hasn't changed on that,' he said.

What Happens Next

The controversy is expected to remain in the spotlight in the coming days. Australia captain Pat Cummins, who was part of the bowling attack during the Cape Town Test, is scheduled to address the media officially in the near future. Mitchell Starc and Mitchell Marsh are set to face reporters on Tuesday and Thursday respectively, ahead of Australia's first ODI against England in Perth.

Greenberg said the bowlers had maintained a consistent account of the episode since 2018 and expected them to stand by their earlier statements. This comes amid growing calls from fans, former players, and commentators for a transparent accounting of one of cricket's most damaging episodes. How Cummins and his teammates respond may determine whether public pressure eventually forces CA to reconsider its current stance.

Point of View

The more the silence itself becomes the story.
NationPress
10 Nov 2026

Frequently Asked Questions

Why has Cricket Australia refused to reopen the 2018 ball-tampering investigation?
CEO Todd Greenberg said the CA board sees no value in revisiting an eight-year-old inquiry, arguing that conflicting accounts among players present in Cape Town make it impossible to establish a definitive version of events. He added that the organisation prefers to move forward rather than reassess decisions made under previous leadership.
What new allegations did Usman Khawaja make in his autobiography?
In his autobiography Sabr, Khawaja alleges that the sandpaper plot involved more players than Warner, Smith, and Bancroft, and that ball tampering had also occurred during the Port Elizabeth Test before the Cape Town incident became public. He also revealed he was never interviewed during the original inquiry, despite sitting alongside Bancroft throughout the Cape Town match.
Did David Warner support Khawaja's account?
Yes. Warner described Khawaja's version of events as '100% accurate.' Former Australia fast bowler Chadd Sayers also backed the revelations in a separate television interview, giving Khawaja's account its broadest corroboration yet.
Who from the Australian team is expected to speak about the controversy next?
Captain Pat Cummins is scheduled to address the media officially in the coming days. Mitchell Starc and Mitchell Marsh are set to face reporters on Tuesday and Thursday respectively, ahead of Australia's first ODI against England in Perth.
Has Cricket Australia changed its position since the new revelations emerged?
No. Greenberg stated explicitly that CA remains comfortable with the conclusions of the original investigation and sees no compelling reason to reopen it, even after Khawaja's book and Warner's corroboration. He said this position has not changed and does not expect it to.
Nation Press
The Trail

Connected Dots

Tracing the thread behind this story — newest first.

8 Dots
  1. Latest Yesterday
  2. Yesterday
  3. 2 days ago
  4. 2 days ago
  5. 2 days ago
  6. 2 weeks ago
  7. 1 month ago
  8. 11 months ago
Google Prefer NP
On Google