Delhi HC refuses interim relief to Vinesh Phogat in Asian Games trials plea

Share:
Audio Loading voice…
Delhi HC refuses interim relief to Vinesh Phogat in Asian Games trials plea

Synopsis

The Delhi High Court has declined to grant Vinesh Phogat interim relief to participate in the Asian Games selection trials — and with the next hearing set for 6 July, well past the 30–31 May trials, her exclusion by the WFI stands for now. The case puts the federation's revised eligibility criteria and its disciplinary process under judicial lens, with Phogat's competitive future hanging in the balance.

Key Takeaways

The Delhi High Court on 18 May declined to grant immediate relief to Vinesh Phogat in her plea against the WFI .
Phogat sought permission to compete in the Asian Games selection trials scheduled for 30–31 May .
Justice Purushaindra Kumar Kaurav refused to pass an interim order without hearing the WFI's stand.
The WFI has declared Phogat ineligible for sanctioned competitions until 26 June , citing 'grave acts of indiscipline' and anti-doping violations.
The WFI's revised eligibility criteria restrict trial entry to medal winners from specified tournaments in 2025–2026 , effectively excluding Phogat.
The next date of hearing is 6 July ; the WFI must conclude disciplinary proceedings and place decisions on record by then.

The Delhi High Court on Monday, 18 May declined to grant immediate interim relief to three-time Olympian wrestler Vinesh Phogat, who had moved court seeking permission to participate in the Asian Games selection trials scheduled for 30–31 May. The court's refusal effectively leaves Phogat's exclusion by the Wrestling Federation of India (WFI) intact for now, with the next hearing listed for 6 July — well after the trials conclude.

What Phogat Sought in Court

Phogat had approached the Delhi High Court challenging her exclusion from the Asian Games selection trials, seeking directions to allow her participation pending adjudication of her plea against the WFI's revised eligibility criteria. Senior Advocate Rajshekhar Rao, appearing for the wrestler, argued before a single-judge Bench of Justice Purushaindra Kumar Kaurav that 'there was something more than meets the eye' in the matter, urging the court to permit her participation subject to the final outcome of the case.

Why the Court Declined to Intervene

Justice Kaurav declined to pass any interim order without first hearing the WFI's position. In an oral remark that underscored the court's caution, the judge observed: 'Unnecessarily, there is no point in allowing you to participate and then telling you that it was a nullity.' The court said it would take up the matter after the summer vacation, listing it for 6 July.

The bench also permitted Phogat to file a comprehensive reply to the show-cause notice issued by the WFI, and directed the federation to carry disciplinary proceedings to their logical conclusion before the next date of hearing. Any decision taken by the WFI in the interim must be placed on record before the court.

WFI's Case Against Phogat

The WFI declared Phogat ineligible to participate in any sanctioned competitions until 26 June, citing what it described as 'grave acts of indiscipline' and alleged violations of anti-doping rules and international wrestling regulations. In a 15-page show-cause notice issued earlier this month, the federation directed the three-time Olympian to explain why disciplinary action should not be initiated, referencing incidents spanning the Paris 2024 Olympics to recent anti-doping failures.

Separately, the WFI introduced revised eligibility criteria for the Asian Games trials, restricting entry to medal winners from specified national-level tournaments held during 2025 and 2026. The criteria effectively shut out Phogat, who has not competed in professional events since the Paris Olympics 2024.

What Happens Next

With the trials set for 30–31 May and the next court date on 6 July, Phogat's window to compete in the current selection cycle has, for practical purposes, closed. The case will now hinge on whether the WFI's disciplinary process and eligibility criteria withstand judicial scrutiny — and whether any relief granted in July can have retrospective effect on her competitive standing. This comes amid a broader, long-running dispute between Phogat and the WFI that has shadowed Indian wrestling since the lead-up to the Paris Games.

Frequently Asked Questions

Why did the Delhi High Court refuse relief to Vinesh Phogat?
The Delhi High Court declined to grant interim relief because it had not yet heard the WFI's side of the case. Justice Purushaindra Kumar Kaurav observed that allowing Phogat to participate before a full hearing could render her participation a nullity if the court later ruled against her.
What are the Asian Games selection trials and when are they scheduled?
The Asian Games selection trials are the qualifying event through which Indian wrestlers earn the right to represent the country at the Asian Games. They are scheduled for 30–31 May 2025.
Why has the WFI excluded Vinesh Phogat from the trials?
The WFI declared Phogat ineligible for sanctioned competitions until 26 June, citing grave acts of indiscipline and alleged violations of anti-doping rules and international wrestling regulations. Additionally, revised eligibility criteria restrict trial entry to medal winners from specified national tournaments held in 2025 and 2026 — a bar Phogat does not meet, as she has not competed professionally since the Paris Olympics 2024.
What happens next in Vinesh Phogat's legal case?
The Delhi High Court has listed the matter for further hearing on 6 July. Phogat has been permitted to file a comprehensive reply to the WFI's show-cause notice, and the WFI has been directed to complete its disciplinary proceedings and place any decisions on record before the next hearing.
What was in the WFI's show-cause notice to Vinesh Phogat?
The WFI issued a 15-page show-cause notice asking Phogat to explain why disciplinary action should not be taken against her. The notice referenced incidents from the Paris 2024 Olympics and alleged recent anti-doping failures, among other grounds cited by the federation.
Nation Press
The Trail

Connected Dots

Tracing the thread behind this story — newest first.

8 Dots
  1. Latest 1 month ago
  2. 2 months ago
  3. 2 months ago
  4. 2 months ago
  5. 2 months ago
  6. 2 months ago
  7. 3 months ago
  8. 3 months ago
Google Prefer NP
On Google