Mohammad Kaif slams 'confused' India T20 management over Sooryavanshi, Samson calls
Synopsis
Key Takeaways
Former India cricketer Mohammad Kaif has launched a sharp critique of the Indian cricket team management, saying he has 'never seen a more confused Indian cricket team management' after the side's 4-0 T20I series defeat to England — a result that also cost India their top position in the ICC Men's T20I rankings. At the centre of the controversy is the erratic handling of teenage batting sensation Vaibhav Sooryavanshi and wicketkeeper-batter Sanju Samson.
What Kaif Said
Posting on his X account on Sunday, Kaif did not mince words. 'Never seen a more confused Indian cricket team management. The handling of Vaibhav Sooryavanshi and Sanju Samson has been far from professional. One is a generational talent, another World Cup winner — they need to be given confidence not doubts in their minds,' he wrote.
The criticism reflects a wider sense of frustration among former players and fans over a tour that began badly — India lost 2-0 to Ireland before the England leg — and ended with a 56-run defeat at Southampton on Saturday.
The Selection Confusion Unpacked
Sanju Samson, who was named Player of the Tournament at this year's T20 World Cup triumph on home soil, was initially included in the playing XI for three matches but was dropped after a string of low scores. He was replaced by Sooryavanshi, who himself failed to cross 20 in his first three T20I innings. Samson was then recalled for the Southampton match to address a top-order left-handed imbalance — only to be dropped again for the upcoming three-game Zimbabwe series starting 23 July, while Sooryavanshi has been retained.
The back-and-forth selection calls have drawn widespread criticism, with many arguing that neither player was given a sustained run to find form.
Manjrekar's IPL Warning
Former India batter Sanjay Manjrekar added another dimension to the debate, urging selectors to look beyond Indian Premier League (IPL) performances when picking for overseas assignments. Writing on his X account, Manjrekar argued that flat domestic surfaces create a distorted picture of a batter's true capability in testing conditions abroad.
'The easy thing would be is to hold players responsible for this overseas T20 setback. The right thing would be is to hold those responsible who have made IPL such, that it puts a heavy make up on Indian batters. Challenge is for the selectors to imagine Indian batters without the heavy IPL make up on and pick only those for India. A lot of T20 cricket will be overseas now. The home fun run is over,' he wrote.
Broader Fallout
The tour has raised uncomfortable questions for a side that holds the T20 World Cup. India's ranking slide is a tangible consequence, but the deeper concern is structural: whether the selection process is equipped to identify players suited for seaming, bouncy overseas tracks rather than the flat, high-scoring pitches that define the IPL and home bilateral cricket.
With the Zimbabwe series on the horizon and a packed international calendar ahead, the team management faces mounting pressure to establish a coherent selection philosophy — and communicate it clearly.