Anbumani Ramadoss slams Tamil Nadu Wetland Authority over Pallikaranai marsh shrinkage

Share:
Audio Loading voice…
Anbumani Ramadoss slams Tamil Nadu Wetland Authority over Pallikaranai marsh shrinkage

Synopsis

The Pallikaranai marsh — once 15,000 acres, now barely 1,725 — faces a new threat: Tamil Nadu's own Wetland Authority has reportedly moved to slash its protected zone from 8,397 acres to just 316, even as a Supreme Court demarcation order from December 2024 sits unimplemented. PMK's Anbumani Ramadoss is demanding answers on whose side the authority is actually on.

Key Takeaways

PMK leader Anbumani Ramadoss on 13 October 2026 accused the Tamil Nadu State Wetland Authority of prioritising private developers over wetland conservation.
The authority reportedly told the Madras High Court it would reduce Pallikaranai's zone of influence from 8,397 acres to 316 acres after inter-departmental consultations on 30 September 2026 .
A Supreme Court direction of 11 December 2024 to demarcate and notify wetland boundaries remains unimplemented, more than ten months later.
Pallikaranai has shrunk from 15,000 acres to an estimated 1,725 acres due to encroachments, according to Anbumani.
The 2021 ISRO Wetland Atlas identifies 26,883 wetlands above 2.25 hectares in Tamil Nadu that could be mapped using satellite data.
Anbumani demanded demolition of a six-foot-high wall and two-kilometre walkway already under construction along the marsh's edge.

Pattali Makkal Katchi (PMK) leader Anbumani Ramadoss on 13 October 2026 accused the Tamil Nadu State Wetland Authority of acting in the interest of private developers by drastically reducing the protected zone of influence around the Pallikaranai marsh in Chennai, while continuing to delay the statutory notification of wetland boundaries despite a Supreme Court directive issued nearly a year ago.

The Zone Reduction at the Heart of the Dispute

The authority reportedly informed the Madras High Court that the marsh's zone of influence would be slashed from 8,397 acres to just 316 acres, following inter-departmental consultations held on 30 September 2026. The disclosure came during High Court proceedings on petitions filed by private construction companies challenging a National Green Tribunal (NGT) order dated 24 September 2025, which had banned construction within one kilometre of the marsh. According to Anbumani, the developers openly welcomed the authority's decision — a detail he cited as evidence of whose interests were being served.

Supreme Court Directive Left Unimplemented

Anbumani questioned the authority's selective urgency: it had moved swiftly to reduce the protective zone, yet had failed to comply with the Supreme Court's direction of 11 December 2024 to demarcate and notify wetland boundaries. He noted that the authority itself told the High Court on 3 December 2024 that satellite-based mapping of Pallikaranai was 99 per cent complete and requested additional time to submit its report. More than ten months later, the notification reportedly remains pending. 'Is the authority working for the government and the people, or for private construction companies?' he asked.

A Wetland in Sharp Decline

Anbumani recalled that Pallikaranai once spread across 15,000 acres between the Adyar river and the Buckingham Canal, stretching from Guindy to Siruseri. It has now shrunk to an estimated 1,725 acres, he claimed, attributing the loss to encroachments over the years. The authority was established in 2016, and wetland conservation rules were introduced in 2017, yet Anbumani alleged that little meaningful progress had been made in securing statutory protection in the nearly decade since.

PMK's Demands and the Satellite Data Argument

Citing the 2021 ISRO Wetland Atlas, Anbumani argued that Tamil Nadu's 26,883 wetlands exceeding 2.25 hectares could be identified and demarcated using available satellite data — making further delays difficult to justify. The PMK leader said his party favoured a science-based determination of zones of influence and full surveying and notification of wetland boundaries. He added that construction within such zones should be regulated rather than subject to a blanket ban — a nuanced position that separates the PMK's stand from an outright no-build stance.

Calls to Demolish Controversial Structures

Anbumani also demanded that the construction of a six-foot-high protective wall along three kilometres of Pallikaranai and a two-kilometre walkway be abandoned, and that structures already erected under these projects be demolished. He urged the TVK government to end delays that had persisted through the previous Dravida Munnetra Kazhagam (DMK) administration and ensure the authority fulfilled its mandate. This is the latest in a series of political interventions over Pallikaranai, which has been at the centre of Chennai's urban ecology debate for over two decades.

Point of View

397 acres to 316 — is a significant capitulation to development pressure, and it arrives while a Supreme Court demarcation order collects dust. The authority's own admission that satellite mapping was 99 per cent complete in December 2024 makes the ten-month delay in notification almost impossible to explain on technical grounds. What is harder to miss is the pattern: Tamil Nadu's wetland governance apparatus has existed since 2016, conservation rules since 2017, yet Pallikaranai has continued to shrink. The TVK government now owns this problem — and the political cost of inaction, with a vocal opposition watching, is rising.
NationPress
13 Oct 2026

Frequently Asked Questions

What is the Pallikaranai marsh controversy about?
The controversy centres on the Tamil Nadu State Wetland Authority's reported decision to reduce the marsh's protected zone of influence from 8,397 acres to just 316 acres, a move PMK leader Anbumani Ramadoss says favours private construction companies over conservation. The issue surfaced during Madras High Court proceedings on developer petitions challenging a National Green Tribunal ban on construction within one kilometre of the marsh.
What has the Supreme Court ordered regarding Pallikaranai?
The Supreme Court directed on 11 December 2024 that wetland boundaries be demarcated and notified. More than ten months later, the notification reportedly remains pending despite the Tamil Nadu State Wetland Authority telling the Madras High Court in December 2024 that satellite-based mapping was 99 per cent complete.
How much has Pallikaranai marsh shrunk over the years?
According to Anbumani Ramadoss, Pallikaranai once covered 15,000 acres between the Adyar river and the Buckingham Canal, stretching from Guindy to Siruseri. It has now shrunk to an estimated 1,725 acres, primarily due to encroachments over the decades.
What is PMK's position on construction near wetlands?
PMK favours a science-based approach: zones of influence should be determined scientifically, and all wetland boundaries fully surveyed and notified. Anbumani said construction in such zones should be regulated rather than subject to a blanket prohibition, distinguishing the party's stance from an outright development ban.
What structures is Anbumani demanding be demolished near Pallikaranai?
Anbumani has demanded that the construction of a six-foot-high protective wall along three kilometres of Pallikaranai and a two-kilometre walkway be abandoned, and that structures already built under these projects be demolished. He urged the TVK government to intervene immediately.
Nation Press
The Trail

Connected Dots

Tracing the thread behind this story — newest first.

8 Dots
  1. Latest 22 hours ago
  2. 3 weeks ago
  3. 11 months ago
  4. 1 year ago
  5. 1 year ago
  6. 1 year ago
  7. 1 year ago
  8. 1 year ago
Google Prefer NP
On Google