MP High Court Judges to Conduct Personal Visit to Bhojshala Site
Synopsis
Key Takeaways
Indore, March 16 (NationPress) The judges from the Indore Bench of the Madhya Pradesh High Court are set to make a personal visit to the contentious Bhojshala site ahead of the upcoming hearing in this case.
The division bench has confirmed its intention to perform a "personal inspection" of the disputed location before the next hearing.
In its ruling, the court clearly articulated that the judges would inspect the site themselves prior to the next hearing date and that no other individuals would be allowed to accompany them during this visit.
The bench, which includes Justice Vijay Shukla and Justice Alok Awasthi, made these remarks while laying out the subsequent steps in the case.
The judges also noted that the Supreme Court has previously issued a definitive directive for the swift resolution of the case.
Referencing the apex court's mandate in their order, the bench highlighted that the Supreme Court has instructed that the case be heard and decided as quickly as possible.
The next hearing is scheduled for April 2.
During Monday's proceedings, the division bench considered detailed proposals and objections from both the petitioners and respondents regarding the comprehensive report submitted by the Archaeological Survey of India (ASI).
It was also recorded that five related petitions are being examined collectively in this batch.
Recalling its previous order dated February 23, the court directed all parties to submit their objections, opinions, suggestions, and recommendations pertaining to the ASI survey report within a span of two weeks.
The ASI conducted a thorough scientific investigation and survey of the entire complex over a duration of 100 days, starting from March 22, 2024.
Additionally, the bench noted in its order that the Supreme Court, on January 22, had instructed the Indore Bench to resume the hearing within a three-week timeframe.
In previous sessions, the court stated that the sealed survey report had already been opened, and copies distributed to all parties, making any further opening of the document before the court unnecessary.
This development represents a crucial advancement in the longstanding dispute, as the court is now poised to scrutinize the ASI findings on-site after reviewing the parties' submissions.
The judges' personal visit is anticipated to offer enhanced clarity as the case progresses further.