Did BJP MLAs Disrupt J&K Assembly Over Omar Abdullah's Comments?

Share:
Audio Loading voice…
Did BJP MLAs Disrupt J&K Assembly Over Omar Abdullah's Comments?

Synopsis

In a dramatic turn of events, BJP MLAs disrupted the J&K Legislative Assembly, demanding an apology from Chief Minister Omar Abdullah over alleged unparliamentary remarks. This incident highlights the ongoing tensions in the assembly and raises questions about parliamentary decorum.

Key Takeaways

The BJP MLAs protested demanding an apology from Chief Minister Omar Abdullah.
The Speaker ruled the protest should not be recorded in the House proceedings.
This incident highlights ongoing political tensions in Jammu and Kashmir.
There is a complex political composition within the J&K Assembly.
The situation may affect future legislative sessions.

Jammu, Feb 11 (NationPress) The opposition members of the Bharatiya Janata Party (BJP) created a significant disruption in the J&K Legislative Assembly on Wednesday, forcefully entering the Well of the House and demanding an apology from Chief Minister Omar Abdullah for remarks they deemed unparliamentary.

Prior to the uproar, BJP representatives had exited the House in protest and returned just as the Question Hour was concluding.

According to BJP members, the Chief Minister chose to leave the assembly upon observing their return after the walkout.

They formed a line and began chanting slogans against the government, insisting on an apology from the Chief Minister.

Nevertheless, the Speaker ruled that the matter could not be revisited after their walkout.

The Speaker further declared that the BJP's protest would not be documented in the official House proceedings.

Subsequently, the BJP members occupied the Well of the House and initiated a sit-in.

Earlier, there were chaotic scenes in the House before the Question Hour when BJP's Sham Lal Sharma demanded an apology from the Chief Minister.

Sharma remarked that such an incident was unprecedented in the history of the Jammu and Kashmir Assembly.

“The language employed by the Chief Minister is not suitable for any Parliament. I challenge the Leader of the House to retract his statements made yesterday regarding the BJP legislative party. If he fails to do so, it is up to his conscience to determine the appropriateness of his words in this House. In the absence of the Chief Minister, I leave it to the Chair to respond,” he stated.

Speaker Abdul Rahim Rather attempted to convince the BJP members to permit the Question Hour to proceed and to address the issue when the Leader of the House was present.

“What transpired yesterday (Tuesday) was regrettable. Let the Chief Minister arrive, and if he wishes, he can make a statement. I cannot speak on his behalf,” the Speaker expressed.

Health Minister Sakeena Itoo accused BJP members of using unparliamentary language as well, particularly against Deputy Chief Minister Surinder Choudhary, and of misleading the House.

Choudhary suggested that the Chair should investigate all unparliamentary words used from both sides and expunge them from the records to allow the proceedings to continue smoothly.

However, BJP Leader of Opposition, Sunil Sharma, rejected this suggestion and led the walkout while chanting slogans such as “derogatory Sarkar Hai Hai, unparliamentary Sarkar Hai Hai, Bharat Mata ki Jai.”

Disorder erupted in the House during Omar Abdullah’s speech yesterday when BJP members raised objections to some of his comments and demanded an apology.

Omar Abdullah was concluding the discussion on the Union Territory’s Budget presented on February 6 when certain remarks he made were labeled as “unparliamentary” by BJP members.

Although the Chief Minister has dismissed the idea of apologizing to BJP members, stating he was open to retracting his words but was not given a chance to speak due to continuous interruptions, Sham Lal Sharma maintained that the party would not allow the House to proceed until Omar Abdullah provided an unconditional apology.

The NC government is backed by six Congress MLAs, while the opposition comprises 29 BJP members, four PDP, one PC, one AIP, and one AAP member.

Point of View

It's crucial to present an unbiased perspective on the ongoing tensions in the J&K Assembly. This incident reflects the challenges of maintaining decorum and civility in political discourse, especially in a region with a complex political landscape. The opposition's actions highlight the need for accountability, while the government's response underscores the importance of respectful dialogue in legislative proceedings.
NationPress
8 May 2026

Frequently Asked Questions

What led to the disruption in the J&K Assembly?
BJP MLAs interrupted the assembly proceedings demanding an apology from Chief Minister Omar Abdullah for remarks they considered unparliamentary.
What actions did the BJP members take during the assembly?
They staged a walkout and later returned to storm the Well of the House, chanting slogans against the government.
How did the Speaker respond to the protest?
The Speaker ruled that the protest could not be documented in the House proceedings and attempted to persuade members to let the Question Hour continue.
What is the political composition of the J&K Assembly?
The assembly includes 29 BJP members, 4 PDP, 1 PC, 1 AIP, and 1 AAP member, with support from 6 Congress MLAs for the NC government.
What are the implications of this incident?
This incident may heighten political tensions in Jammu and Kashmir and impact the functioning of the legislative assembly.
Nation Press
The Trail

Connected Dots

Tracing the thread behind this story — newest first.

8 Dots
  1. Latest 1 month ago
  2. 2 months ago
  3. 3 months ago
  4. 3 months ago
  5. 3 months ago
  6. 3 months ago
  7. 1 year ago
  8. 1 year ago
Google Prefer NP
On Google