Is the Bombay vs Mumbai Dispute Back? Raj Thackeray Critiques MoS Jitendra Singh and Targets the Centre

Click to start listening
Is the Bombay vs Mumbai Dispute Back? Raj Thackeray Critiques MoS Jitendra Singh and Targets the Centre

Synopsis

The heated debate over the name of Maharashtra's capital reignites as Raj Thackeray criticizes Union Minister Jitendra Singh's remarks about IIT Bombay. Thackeray warns of potential attempts to detach Mumbai from Maharashtra. With upcoming elections, tensions rise as both parties vie for voter support amidst claims of political maneuvering.

Key Takeaways

  • The name debate between Mumbai and Bombay continues to evoke strong sentiments.
  • Raj Thackeray's criticism highlights political tensions ahead of elections.
  • The BJP defends its role in the adoption of the name 'Mumbai'.
  • Understanding the historical context is essential in this discussion.
  • The ongoing dialogue reflects broader issues of regional identity and pride.

Mumbai, Nov 26 (NationPress) The enduring dispute surrounding the name of Maharashtra's capital -- "Mumbai" versus "Bombay" -- has reignited following comments made by Union Minister of State for Science and Technology Jitendra Singh at a recent IIT Mumbai event. He expressed relief that IIT Bombay's designation remains unchanged, asserting that, similar to IIT Madras, IIT Bombay should keep its original name.

Raj Thackeray, chief of the Maharashtra Navnirman Sena (MNS), harshly criticized Singh's remarks, claiming they reflect the government's perspective. Thackeray stated, "What is this perspective? The scheme to detach Mumbai -- which has always belonged to the Marathi populace -- from Maharashtra was thwarted by Marathi leaders and the community. Our Marathi Mumbai has stayed in Maharashtra. Now, the resentment that's been brewing for decades is beginning to surface once more," in a post on X. He suggested that the central government is uncomfortable with the name "Mumbai" and favors "Bombay".

Thackeray further asserted, "In reality, Jitendra Singh has no ties to Mumbai, Maharashtra, or Gujarat. He originates from Jammu... but his goal is to curry favor with the higher-ups by voicing their sentiments." He accused the government of trying to connect Mumbai and the Mumbai Metropolitan Region (MMR) to Gujarat and urged the Marathi population to remain vigilant.

"Today, my message is directed not only to the residents of Mumbai but to all Marathi individuals within the entire MMR area: it's time to awaken. The name 'Mumbai' disturbs them because it honors Mumbadevi, the original goddess of Mumbai -- our Mumbai. All her children are the Marathi inhabitants who have dwelled here for generations. You and your city irritate them," Thackeray added.

He also cautioned that the Centre had previously attempted to take control of Chandigarh from Punjab and, after facing opposition from all parties, retreated -- but he deemed that a temporary retreat and indicated that a similar scheme is "100 percent brewing" for Mumbai.

"They desire 'Bombay' -- not 'Mumbai'. This is a covert effort to seize control of the city. First Mumbai, then the entire MMR will be annexed and associated with Gujarat! So awaken, Marathi populace. We are witnessing daily how central agents, industrialists, and others have begun to dominate everything here! It's crucial for the Marathi community to recognize this," he emphasized.

Thackeray's critique of Minister Singh comes ahead of the forthcoming Brihanmumbai Municipal Corporation elections, where he and his cousin Uddhav Thackeray -- leader of Shiv Sena (UBT) -- are expected to jointly campaign on safeguarding the "Marathi Manoos" and appealing to voters to counter perceived attempts by the BJP-led Centre to "detach" Mumbai from Maharashtra. MNS supporters have reportedly placed banners outside the IIT campus stating "IIT Mumbai, Not IIT Bombay".

The BJP responded to Raj Thackeray's statements by accusing him of making "freestyle allegations" and engaging in politics devoid of facts. State party media in-charge Navnath Ban highlighted that the decision to officially adopt the name "Mumbai" occurred under the Shiv Sena-BJP administration in the state, and pointed out that it was a BJP leader who initially promoted the use of "Mumbai" at the national level.

"It was BJP’s Ram Naik who first referred to it as 'Mumbai' in Parliament, establishing this change at a national level," Ban stated, suggesting that Raj Thackeray may have forgotten this history, possibly due to his desire to align with Uddhav Thackeray. "While the central government is providing world-class connectivity to Mumbai–MMR, some individuals become politically disoriented, which is why the Gujarat issue gets invoked. In truth, the central government is advancing major initiatives for the development of Mumbai–MMR. Through projects like the Metro, bullet train, coastal road connectivity, and multimodal corridors, we can elevate the nation's financial capital to a global stature," the BJP's statement read.

Ban further asserted that witnessing development projects causes "some individuals' political nausea" to rise, leading to the creation of a "bogus Gujarat bogey" for fear-mongering politics. He encouraged Mumbaikars to support Chief Minister Devendra Fadnavis as the leader who will "propel Maharashtra to the forefront."

Point of View

It is crucial to approach the Bombay versus Mumbai debate with an unbiased perspective. This ongoing discussion reflects deeper cultural and political sentiments in Maharashtra. Both sides present valid arguments, and it is essential to foster dialogue that respects the historical significance of the city's name while addressing current political dynamics. The article underscores the importance of unity and understanding in navigating these complex issues.
NationPress
27/11/2025

Frequently Asked Questions

What triggered the recent Bombay vs Mumbai debate?
The debate reignited after Union Minister Jitendra Singh's remarks at an IIT Mumbai event, where he expressed relief that the name IIT Bombay was not changed.
Who is Raj Thackeray?
Raj Thackeray is the chief of the Maharashtra Navnirman Sena (MNS) and a prominent political figure in Maharashtra.
What are the implications of the Bombay vs Mumbai controversy?
The controversy has political ramifications, especially with upcoming elections, as it highlights issues of identity and regional pride among the Marathi population.
What did the BJP say in response to Thackeray's criticism?
The BJP accused Thackeray of making unfounded allegations and pointed out that the name 'Mumbai' was officially adopted during the Shiv Sena-BJP government.
How does this debate affect the Marathi community?
The debate stirs emotions within the Marathi community, reflecting their historical connection to the name 'Mumbai' and concerns over political maneuvers.
Nation Press