Congress MLA Manohar Prasad Singh Responds to Disciplinary Notice Over Rajya Sabha Election Absence
Synopsis
Congress MLA Manohar Prasad Singh addresses the disciplinary notice he received for missing the Rajya Sabha election vote, raising concerns about alliances and party integrity in Bihar's political landscape.
Key Takeaways
Manohar Prasad Singh responds to disciplinary action.
Concerns over alliances with AIMIM and BJP .
Claims that Grand Alliance lacks necessary votes.
Highlights internal conflicts within Bihar's opposition.
Patna, March 25 (NationPress) Congress MLA Manohar Prasad Singh has formally addressed the notice issued by the party’s disciplinary committee chairman, Kapildev Prasad Yadav, regarding his absence during the voting for the 2026 Rajya Sabha elections in the Bihar Assembly.
In his detailed response, Singh, representing the Manihari Assembly constituency, voiced significant concerns regarding the alleged alliance of the All India Majlis-e-Ittehadul Muslimeen (AIMIM) with the Grand Alliance (Mahagathbandhan) candidate.
He articulated that AIMIM is widely viewed as the “B-team” of the Bharatiya Janata Party and labeled it a communal entity, asserting that any collaboration with such a party contradicts the fundamental ideologies of the Congress party.
Singh also pointed out that the Grand Alliance lacked the essential 41 votes in the Assembly to secure victory in the Rajya Sabha elections.
Given this numerical challenge, he opted not to engage in the voting process.
He made a strong statement, suggesting that for a national entity like the Indian National Congress, forming any alliance—be it direct or indirect—with a party it had previously criticized would be politically and ethically unjustifiable.
He compared this action to deliberately swallowing a live fly, arguing it would damage the party’s principles, dignity, and political standing.
Singh further claimed he had no advance notice regarding the selection of the Grand Alliance candidate, distancing himself from the decision-making process.
Recalling past political events, Singh mentioned that before the Bihar Assembly elections, AIMIM had sought to join the Grand Alliance but was rejected, with party leaders labeling it as aligned with the BJP.
He raised concerns that any subsequent dependence on AIMIM's backing posed questions about political integrity and ethics.
In his defense, Singh maintained that even if he and three other absent MLAs had participated in the voting, the defeat of the Grand Alliance candidate would have been unavoidable.
This controversy has intensified the existing internal conflicts within the opposition coalition in Bihar following their defeat in the Rajya Sabha elections.
Point of View
The situation underscores the internal challenges facing the opposition in Bihar, particularly within the Congress party. Manohar Prasad Singh's response highlights the broader issues of political alliances and ideological consistency that are crucial in contemporary Indian politics.
NationPress
11 May 2026
Frequently Asked Questions
What was the reason for Manohar Prasad Singh's absence?
Manohar Prasad Singh chose not to participate in the voting process due to concerns about the Grand Alliance's collaboration with the AIMIM, which he views as detrimental to Congress's principles.
What are Singh's views on AIMIM?
Singh perceives AIMIM as the 'B-team' of the BJP and a communal party, arguing that any alliance with it contradicts Congress's ideological stance.
How does Singh justify his decision?
Singh believes that even if he and other absent MLAs had voted, the Grand Alliance candidate's defeat was inevitable due to a lack of necessary votes.
What implications does this controversy have?
The controversy highlights ongoing internal tensions within the opposition coalition in Bihar, especially after their recent electoral setbacks.
Who is Kapildev Prasad Yadav?
Kapildev Prasad Yadav is the chairman of the Congress party's disciplinary committee who issued the notice to Singh.
