Will a Delhi Court Transfer Rabri Devi's Corruption Cases?
Synopsis
In a significant legal move, former Bihar CM Rabri Devi seeks to transfer three corruption cases from a Delhi court, claiming bias. The court's response and implications for justice will unfold on December 6. Stay tuned for updates on this high-profile case.
Key Takeaways
Rabri Devi has filed transfer requests for her cases.
Concerns of bias have been raised against Special Judge Vishal Gogne .
The next hearing is set for December 6 .
The cases involve significant allegations of corruption and money laundering .
Public interest in judicial fairness is paramount.
New Delhi, Nov 28 (NationPress) A Delhi court has served notices to the Central Bureau of Investigation (CBI) and the Enforcement Directorate (ED) regarding transfer requests made by former Bihar Chief Minister Rabri Devi. She is seeking to relocate three ongoing corruption and money laundering cases away from the court of Special Judge Vishal Gogne.
The Rouse Avenue Courts have requested responses from both federal agencies and scheduled a hearing for December 6 to discuss these applications. The transfer requests involve the CBI's land-for-jobs case, as well as the ED's money laundering investigations connected to that FIR and the IRCTC hotel scam.
Previously, on Wednesday, Principal District and Sessions Judge-cum-Special Judge (PC Act) Dinesh Bhatt asked the CBI to respond to a similar plea regarding the transfer of the IRCTC scam case from Judge Gogne's court.
In her plea, Rabri Devi argues that Judge Gogne’s actions during multiple hearings have instilled a “reasonable apprehension of bias” in her.
“The conduct of the Ld. Special Judge on various occasions throughout the proceedings in these cases appears to be disproportionately favorable to the prosecution and biased, as evidenced by several instances within the case proceedings/orders themselves,” the transfer plea contends, adding that her concerns are based on specific occurrences rather than mere speculation.
Rabri Devi has requested that the cases be transferred to another court “to uphold justice, equity, and fair play.”
The IRCTC hotel scam case, where charges under Sections 420 and 120B of the Indian Penal Code and the Prevention of Corruption Act were to be framed last month, involves alleged improper lease agreements for IRCTC hotels from 2004 to 2009, during which Lalu Prasad served as the Union Railway Minister.
In the CBI’s land-for-jobs inquiry, the agency alleges that candidates vying for Group-D roles in the Railways transferred land to Lalu Prasad’s family members or front companies in return for employment.
The ED claims its linked money laundering case involves transactions that generated proceeds of crime, subsequently obscured through various entities.
All four transfer requests—the IRCTC scam, the land-for-jobs case, and the two associated ED matters—are set to be addressed on December 6.
Point of View
It is crucial to recognize the implications of Rabri Devi's transfer requests. This case underscores the intersection of politics and justice, highlighting concerns over judicial impartiality. The developments will be closely monitored as they reflect broader issues of accountability within the political arena.
NationPress
10 May 2026
Frequently Asked Questions
What are the charges against Rabri Devi?
Rabri Devi faces allegations in multiple corruption and money laundering cases, including the IRCTC hotel scam and the CBI's land-for-jobs case.
Why is Rabri Devi seeking a transfer of her cases?
She claims that the conduct of Special Judge Vishal Gogne has created a reasonable apprehension of bias during the proceedings.
What does the IRCTC hotel scam involve?
The IRCTC hotel scam pertains to alleged irregular lease agreements for hotels managed by the Indian Railway Catering and Tourism Corporation between 2004 and 2009.
When is the next hearing scheduled?
The next hearing on the transfer requests is scheduled for December 6.
How does this case reflect on the judicial system?
The case raises important questions about judicial independence and the perception of bias in high-profile political cases.
