Is There a Breach of Privilege? Delhi Speaker Reacts to Punjab Police FIR Against Kapil Mishra

Share:
Audio Loading voice…
Is There a Breach of Privilege? Delhi Speaker Reacts to Punjab Police FIR Against Kapil Mishra

Synopsis

The Delhi Assembly Speaker raises serious concerns about a Punjab Police FIR against Minister Kapil Mishra, claiming a breach of privilege. This controversial case revolves around an unauthorized video, sparking political tensions and accusations of misuse of power. What does this mean for the assembly's integrity?

Key Takeaways

The FIR against Kapil Mishra is based on a video clip from Assembly proceedings.
Delhi Speaker emphasizes the Assembly's right over its recordings.
Accusations of political misuse of police authority have emerged.
Potential actions against officials involved may arise.
This incident highlights ongoing political tensions in Delhi.

New Delhi, Jan 9 (NationPress) Delhi Speaker Vijender Gupta announced on Friday that the Assembly has officially acknowledged the FIR lodged by Punjab Police against Minister Kapil Mishra, stemming from an unauthorized video recording of the House proceedings.

This video, allegedly associated with claims of disrespect towards Sikh Gurus by AAP leader Atishi, was brought to attention by Laxmi Nagar MLA Abhay Verma from the BJP.

The FIR, filed by Jalandhar Police, is based on the video related to the Atishi incident in the Delhi Assembly, which the Punjab Police downloaded from Mishra’s X handle and subjected to forensic analysis, declaring it “tampered” before taking action against Mishra.

Speaker Gupta asserted that the matter raised by Verma constitutes a breach of privilege of the Assembly.

“The FIR is based on a video that records the Assembly proceedings and is the property of the Assembly. Taking such actions against a Minister based on this video is a grave matter. This presents a clear case of breach of privilege against the Police Commissioner of Jalandhar,” Gupta stated.

He emphasized that recordings made inside the Assembly exclusively belong to the Assembly.

“It is crucial to understand the basis on which this case was registered. The House will review the issue and consider appropriate actions against the Police Commissioner of Jalandhar due to unwarranted interference with the Assembly’s property,” added Speaker Gupta.

This video is indeed the Assembly's property, recorded within its confines. In response to the Opposition's demand, the matter was referred to the Forensic Science Laboratory for verification,” noted the Speaker.

Labeling the recording as “tampered” undermines the dignity of the Assembly, and anyone found complicit in this conspiracy will face strict consequences from the House, according to the Speaker, who confirmed, “The House is formally taking cognizance of the entire issue.”

Mishra accused AAP National Convenor Arvind Kejriwal of exploiting Punjab Police to file a false FIR against him to intimidate and silence him.

In a message posted on X, Mishra stated, “Mr. Kejriwal, your FIR and the threat from the police won't intimidate us. The Assembly has the video, and the entire world has heard it… since then, Atishi has avoided attending the Assembly despite several calls from the Speaker.”

“The Punjab Police, neglecting crime investigations in Punjab, is attempting to cover up the wrongdoing of your Leader of the Opposition. Atishi has committed an offense, and in trying to protect her, you are committing an even greater transgression,” Mishra conveyed.

He referenced the claims made by Jalandhar Police that Atishi did not use inflammatory language in the Delhi Assembly.

Previously, the Jalandhar Police had focused on a specific video clip sourced from Mishra's social media profile, which was sent to the Director of the Forensic Science Laboratory (FSL) in Punjab, SAS Nagar. The investigation concluded that the video had been intentionally “doctored,” leading to the FIR being filed against Mishra.

Point of View

This incident highlights the ongoing tensions between political figures and the judicial system. The claims of misuse of police authority and breach of privilege illustrate the complexities in governance. It remains essential that the integrity of the Assembly and the rights of its members are upheld, ensuring that political discourse is not stifled.
NationPress
21 Jun 2026

Frequently Asked Questions

What is the basis of the FIR against Kapil Mishra?
The FIR was filed based on an unauthorized video clip of the Delhi Assembly proceedings, which Punjab Police claimed had been tampered with.
What did the Delhi Speaker say about this issue?
Speaker Vijender Gupta stated that the FIR represents a breach of privilege and emphasized that the recordings from the Assembly belong exclusively to the House.
How did Kapil Mishra respond to the FIR?
Mishra accused AAP leader Arvind Kejriwal of using Punjab Police to intimidate him and undermine his position.
What actions might the Assembly take in response?
The Assembly may consider appropriate action against the Police Commissioner of Jalandhar for unwarranted interference with Assembly property.
What implications does this have for political discourse?
This incident raises concerns about the integrity of political discourse and the potential misuse of authority by governmental bodies.
Nation Press
The Trail

Connected Dots

Tracing the thread behind this story — newest first.

8 Dots
  1. Latest 4 months ago
  2. 4 months ago
  3. 4 months ago
  4. 4 months ago
  5. 5 months ago
  6. 5 months ago
  7. 5 months ago
  8. 5 months ago
Google Prefer NP
On Google