US Section 301 tariff at 10%: FIEO says India's export edge intact
Synopsis
Key Takeaways
The Federation of Indian Export Organisations (FIEO) on Friday, 24 July said the additional 10 per cent Section 301 tariff imposed by the United States on imports from India is unlikely to significantly erode the country's export competitiveness, noting that rival exporting nations face comparable or steeper duties in the same measure.
India's Relative Position in the Tariff Order
FIEO President S.C. Ralhan argued that the new tariff must be assessed against the treatment accorded to competing supplier countries rather than in isolation. He pointed out that China, Vietnam, Thailand, Türkiye, the UAE, Brazil, and South Africa have been placed in a higher 12.5 per cent tariff bracket, while India sits in the lower 10 per cent category.
'India has not been singled out under the new US measure. The fact that India has been placed in the lower 10 per cent tariff category... reflects the recognition by the US of the policy measures taken by the Government of India to strengthen its framework relating to forced labour,' Ralhan said.
He added that India's direct competitors in labour-intensive sectors — including Bangladesh, Cambodia, Pakistan, Sri Lanka, Indonesia, and Malaysia — face the same 10 per cent rate, meaning Indian exporters in textiles, garments, leather, and footwear retain their relative standing in the US market.
A 2.5% Differential That Could Shift Sourcing
FIEO noted that Indian exporters could benefit from trade diversion in segments where rival nations face the higher 12.5 per cent duty. Ralhan observed that 'even a differential of 2.5 per cent can influence sourcing decisions in highly competitive markets, particularly where Indian exporters are able to offer quality products, reliable deliveries and stable supply chains.'
This is a notable opening: in price-sensitive commodity categories, a 2.5 percentage point cost advantage can be decisive for large-volume US buyers re-evaluating their supplier mix.
Key Exclusions That Limit the Damage
FIEO also highlighted that several critical product categories — including steel, aluminium, auto components, pharmaceuticals, pharmaceutical ingredients, and certain agricultural products already covered under Section 232 measures — continue to enjoy exclusions from the new tariff. This limits the scope of impact across a number of high-value export sectors.
The body credited the government's strengthened legal and policy framework on forced labour for securing India's relatively favourable tariff position compared to many global competitors.
What Exporters Should Do Now
FIEO urged exporters to assess the tariff's impact on a product-by-product basis, factoring in applicable US duties, available exclusions, and the duty treatment of competing suppliers. It advised firms to reinforce supply chain compliance, improve productivity, and invest in quality, innovation, and value addition to capture emerging opportunities in the US market.
With the global tariff landscape in flux, how Indian exporters respond in the next few quarters will determine whether the relative advantage translates into measurable market share gains.