Did Gujarat Really Delete 68,12,711 Voter Names While Lakshadweep Only 206?

Share:
Audio Loading voice…
Did Gujarat Really Delete 68,12,711 Voter Names While Lakshadweep Only 206?

Synopsis

Gujarat has witnessed a staggering deletion of over 68 lakh names from its electoral roll, a move attributed to a national verification process. In contrast, Lakshadweep's numbers saw minimal change. This article delves into the reasons behind these adjustments and their impacts on voter registration across different states.

Key Takeaways

Gujarat has removed over 68 lakh names from its electoral rolls.
Lakshadweep experienced the least changes with only 206 deletions.
The adjustments are part of a verification process by the Election Commission.
Accurate voter lists are essential for fair elections .
Other states also saw significant changes in their electorates.

Did Gujarat Really Delete 68,12,711 Voter Names While Lakshadweep Only 206?

New Delhi, Feb 21 (NationPress) Following the announcement of the Final Electoral Roll for Andaman and Nicobar Islands, Chhattisgarh, Goa, Kerala, Madhya Pradesh, and Rajasthan, the Election Commission of India (ECI) released SIR snapshots on Saturday. Gujarat saw a significant deletion of 68,12,711 voters' names, while Lakshadweep reported the lowest deletions at only 206.

The Commission elaborated on the scale of deletions, attributing these changes to systematic verification processes designed to uphold clean and accurate voter rolls.

The net change in the number of voters during the SIR was most pronounced in Andaman and Nicobar Islands at 16.87%, followed closely by Gujarat at 13.40%.

In Gujarat, the voter count before the SIR was 5,08,43,436. Post-revision, this number dropped to 4,40,30,725, indicating a deletion of 68,12,711 names -- a net change of 13.40%.

The Commission indicated that these deletions stemmed primarily from voters deemed ineligible due to reasons such as death, permanent emigration, duplicate registrations, and other legal grounds identified during field verification.

In Lakshadweep, the electorate saw a marginal decrease from 57,813 prior to the SIR to 57,607 after the exercise -- a net change of 0.36%. This amounted to a decrease of 206 voters.

Puducherry's electorate also witnessed a decline, from 10,21,578 before the revision to 9,44,211 after the SIR, reflecting a net change of 7.57%.

Rajasthan experienced a slight reduction in voters, decreasing from 5,46,56,215 before the revision to 5,15,19,929 after SIR, resulting in a net change of 5.74%.

Madhya Pradesh's total number of electors before the SIR was 5,74,06,143, which fell to 5,39,81,065 post-revision, marking a deletion of 34,25,078 names -- a net change of 5.97%.

In Kerala, the number of electors decreased from 2,78,50,855 to 2,69,53,644 after the revision, resulting in a net change of 3.22%.

Goa's electorate before the SIR was 11,85,034, which dropped to 10,57,566 after the revision, marking a deletion of 1,27,468 names -- a net change of 10.75%.

In Chhattisgarh, the electorate declined from 2,12,30,737 to 1,87,30,914 after the SIR, reflecting a net change of 11.77%.

The Andaman and Nicobar Islands started with 3,10,404 electors, which decreased to 2,58,040 after the revision, marking a deletion of 52,364 names -- a net change of 16.67%.

Point of View

The recent deletions in Gujarat and other states highlight the critical need for maintaining accurate voter lists. The Election Commission's verification processes are essential for ensuring the integrity of elections, which is paramount for a democratic society. Although the deletions seem alarming, they are necessary for upholding the electoral system's credibility.
NationPress
11 May 2026

Frequently Asked Questions

Why were so many voter names deleted in Gujarat?
The deletions were primarily due to ineligible voters identified through verification processes, including deaths, permanent migration, and duplicate registrations.
What does SIR stand for?
SIR stands for Systematic Voter Registration, a process aimed at ensuring accurate and clean electoral rolls.
How does this affect future elections?
Maintaining an accurate voter list is crucial for fair elections, and these deletions help ensure that only eligible voters are registered.
Nation Press
The Trail

Connected Dots

Tracing the thread behind this story — newest first.

8 Dots
  1. Latest 2 months ago
  2. 2 months ago
  3. 3 months ago
  4. 3 months ago
  5. 3 months ago
  6. 3 months ago
  7. 4 months ago
  8. 4 months ago
Google Prefer NP
On Google