Controversy Surrounds Recruitment in Jamnagar: Candidates Rally Against GETCO
Click to start listening
Synopsis
On March 25, hundreds of candidates from Gujarat assembled at GETCO in Jamnagar for lineman apprentice recruitment. The event escalated into controversy as over 400 candidates claimed unfair practices and misinformation regarding eligibility, prompting protests and demands for transparency from GETCO.
Key Takeaways
- Over 400 candidates protested against GETCO.
- Claims of unfair recruitment practices emerged.
- GETCO alleged restrictions based on district eligibility.
- Candidates expressed frustration over misleading information.
- Demands for legal action and accountability were made.
Jamnagar, March 25 (NationPress) Hundreds of candidates from across Gujarat converged at the Gujarat Energy Transmission Corporation Limited (GETCO) in Jamnagar for the recruitment process of lineman apprentices.
However, the recruitment initiative swiftly became a contentious issue, with more than 400 candidates alleging unfair practices and misleading information from the company.
GETCO had allegedly stated that only candidates from three specific districts were invited to take part in the recruitment process.
Nevertheless, numerous candidates, who had travelled from various parts of the state, claimed that the official recruitment advertisement did not mention any such limitations.
This inconsistency resulted in considerable frustration and anger among the candidates, many of whom incurred significant expenses travelling to Jamnagar.
Upon arriving at the recruitment site, many candidates were dismayed to discover that they were not permitted to participate.
The company officials asserted that only candidates from Jamnagar, Dwarka, and one other district were eligible, a statement that directly contradicted the expectations set by the recruitment advertisement. This led to heated debates and protests at the venue.
Several candidates voiced their dissatisfaction, stating they had journeyed long distances at their own cost, only to be denied entry.
The affected candidates demanded accountability from GETCO, questioning why the recruitment announcement had not clearly outlined the district-wise selection criteria in advance. As more candidates gathered and expressed their grievances, the situation intensified.
Protesters accused GETCO of deceiving job seekers and demanded immediate clarification.
Many candidates chanted slogans against the company, calling for transparency and fairness in the hiring process. The recruitment drive, initially anticipated to be a smooth process, devolved into a chaotic scene with security personnel intervening to manage the unrest.
Despite efforts by officials to calm the crowd, the anger persisted, underscoring the profound dissatisfaction among job seekers.
In response to the uproar, GETCO officials insisted that they had only invited candidates from the designated districts and denied any wrongdoing.
However, many candidates are now pursuing legal action or seeking intervention from government authorities to resolve the matter.
As job seekers await further clarification, the demand for equitable hiring practices continues to escalate, placing pressure on GETCO to address the complaints of the affected candidates.
