Did J&K Crime Branch Just Submit a Charge Sheet Against 8 Accused in a Land Fraud Case?
Click to start listening
Synopsis
On October 17, the J&K Crime Branch's Economic Offences Wing revealed it has filed a charge sheet against eight individuals implicated in a significant land fraud. This case involves manipulation of land records and the misuse of official positions, spotlighting corruption in the region.
Key Takeaways
- Significant land fraud case initiated by J&K Crime Branch.
- Charge sheet filed against eight individuals, including revenue officials.
- Fraudulent manipulation of land records and illegal encroachments.
- Investigations revealed multiple irregularities in documentation.
- Ongoing commitment to accountability by the Crime Branch.
Srinagar, Oct 17 (NationPress) The Economic Offences Wing of the J&K Crime Branch (Kashmir) announced on Friday that it has filed a charge sheet in court concerning a significant land fraud case.
A statement from the Crime Branch noted, “The Economic Offences Wing has lodged a charge sheet in FIR No. 23/2019, linked to a serious land fraud case. This charge sheet was presented before the Hon’ble Court of Special Judge Anti-Corruption in Srinagar.”
The charge sheet targets eight accused individuals, which includes four revenue officials—three retired and one currently active—who misused their official capacities for fraudulent land occupation and record manipulation.
The investigation stemmed from a complaint alleging that Nadeem Ahmad Mayer and Shafiq Ahmad Mayer, residents of Iqbal Colony, Shalteng Srinagar, illegally encroached upon 52 Kanals of land at Ehel Danihama by fabricating documentation.
They executed fake and forged mutation numbers 13, 16, 17, 18, and 30, 31, 34, under the pretense of an oral gift (Hiba Zabani) from the complainant’s uncle, despite having no legitimate or familial justification.
Investigators uncovered various irregularities, such as the missing official mutation record (Parti Sarkar), absent treasury voucher numbers and dates, and unauthorized mutation conducted by a single co-owner, ignoring the rights of others. Furthermore, 40 Kanals of state land were discovered to be illegally seized.
The alleged fraud was carried out in close collaboration with revenue officials, who played a crucial role in altering records and bypassing legal protocols.
“The chargesheet includes Nadeem Ahmad Mayer, son of Shafiq Ahmad Mayer, resident of Iqbal Colony, Shalteng, Srinagar; Irfan Ahmad Mayer, son of Shafiq Ahmad Mayer, resident of Iqbal Colony, Shalteng, Srinagar; Ab. Hamid Kathu, son of Ali Mohammad Kathu, resident of Tailbal Srinagar (then Pathwari, now retired), Ghulam Jeelani Rather, son of Late Ab. Salam Rather, resident of Dara Harwan, Srinagar (then Patwari), Ali Mohammad Dar (then Patwari, now retired), Nazir Ahmad Palla, son of Ghulam Ahmad Palla, resident of Harwan; and Bilal Ahmad Dar, son of Ab. Gani Dar, resident of Mufti Bagh, Harwan, currently New Theed, Srinagar,” the statement detailed.
The accused are facing charges under Sections 420, 447-A, 467, 468, 471, and 120-B of the RPC, along with Section 5(2) of the Prevention of Corruption Act.
“The Crime Branch Kashmir is dedicated to enforcing the law and ensuring accountability. Further legal actions are underway,” the statement concluded.
Point of View
It is crucial to acknowledge the systemic issues of corruption that persist in various regions, including J&K. The recent actions taken by the Crime Branch represent a significant step towards accountability and transparency. The public deserves assurance that such fraudulent activities will not go unchecked, reinforcing the need for stringent oversight in land management and governance.
NationPress
17/10/2025
Frequently Asked Questions
What allegations are made in the land fraud case?
The case alleges that individuals manipulated land records and illegally occupied land using fraudulent documentation.
Who are the accused in this case?
The accused include eight individuals, among them four revenue officials, three of whom are retired.
What legal actions have been taken?
A charge sheet has been filed against the accused under various sections of the RPC and the Prevention of Corruption Act.
What is the significance of this case?
This case highlights serious issues of corruption within local governance, emphasizing the need for accountability in land management.
How is the Crime Branch responding to the case?
The Crime Branch has expressed its commitment to uphold the law and ensure accountability as further legal proceedings continue.
