Does the Pakistani Military's Obsession with Grandeur Endanger the Country?

Click to start listening
Does the Pakistani Military's Obsession with Grandeur Endanger the Country?

Synopsis

A recent report reveals the dangerous delusion of grandeur within Pakistan's military, highlighting how Generals' fixation on power undermines the nation's stability and progress. Asim Munir's rise exemplifies this troubling trend, with serious implications for the future of Pakistan amidst economic despair and climate vulnerability.

Key Takeaways

  • Pakistan's military delusion threatens national stability.
  • Generals prioritize militarized nationalism over democracy.
  • Asim Munir's rise reflects a historic pattern of military control.
  • Military interventions have weakened Pakistan’s governance.
  • Citizens must advocate for sovereignty and accountability.

Islamabad, Oct 25 (NationPress) The delusion of grandeur within Pakistan's military poses a significant threat, not only through external miscalculations but also due to its internal decline. The Generals’ fixation on magnificence distracts them from the harsh realities faced by an economically strained and climate-vulnerable populace, as highlighted in a report published on Saturday.

“The elevation of Asim Munir to Field Marshal and his sustained influence over Pakistan’s political and institutional realms signify not a revival of national resilience but a worsening of a longstanding issue — the military’s grandiosity that has consistently undermined the nation’s prospects for stability and advancement,” the report from India Narrative explained.

Following in the footsteps of previous Army Chiefs like Ayub Khan, Zia-ul-Haq, and Pervez Musharraf, Munir embodies the military’s conviction that salvation is found not in democracy or development, but in a militarized nationalism that prioritizes the soldier over the citizen and paranoia over pragmatism.

“For seventy-five years, Pakistan’s generals have portrayed themselves as the protectors of a fragile state, intervening to ‘rescue’ it from civilian shortcomings. From Ayub Khan’s coup and Zia’s Islamization to Musharraf’s 'Enlightened Moderation,' each military intervention was justified as a patriotic necessity — and each has left the nation weaker, poorer, and more frustrated,” the report noted.

The report emphasized that, under the guise of national pride and Islamic fortitude, Munir’s ascent to Field Marshal in 2025 dramatically underscored that the true center of power in Islamabad resides behind the khaki curtain of Rawalpindi’s General Headquarters.

“Munir’s carefully crafted image as a pious general — a memorizer of the Qur’an and moral guardian — resonates well in a society steeped in religio-military nationalism. However, it obscures a fundamental truth: that Pakistan’s generals, intoxicated by their perceived divine mission, have repeatedly confused personal authority with state strength. The consequence has been an unending cycle of authoritarianism cloaked in ideology, leading to both political stagnation and economic devastation,” it asserted.

The tragedy of Pakistan under Munir, the report contended, lies in its duplicity—a republic in name, yet a garrison in practice, with civilian administrations functioning merely as extensions of military will. The judiciary bends to the pressures of “national security” while the media endures constant repression.

The report revealed that Munir’s latest maneuvers — including a ten-year extension plan to cling to power until 2035 — showcase the military’s belief that “Pakistan’s salvation” lies in “continuity of command” rather than “constitutional accountability.”

“Unless the citizens of Pakistan reclaim sovereignty from military control, the nation will continue to be a tragic stage of militarized hubris — where generals envision empires while their country struggles under debt, disillusionment, and decay. Munir’s rule, although adorned with the pomp of a Field Marshal, will likely be remembered not for victories achieved but for opportunities squandered — a continuation of Pakistan’s longest, most destructive delusion: that salvation wears a uniform,” it concluded.

Point of View

I firmly believe that our nation's strength lies in embracing democratic values and accountable governance. The military's fixation on grandeur is detrimental, and it's essential that we, as citizens, advocate for our rights and sovereignty to ensure a healthier future for Pakistan.
NationPress
25/10/2025

Frequently Asked Questions

What is the main concern regarding the Pakistani military?
The primary concern is the military's delusion of grandeur, which distracts leadership from addressing critical socio-economic issues, leading to internal decay.
How does Asim Munir's rise impact Pakistan?
Munir's rise to Field Marshal signifies a continuation of the military's historic reliance on militarized nationalism, which often undermines democratic processes and civilian governance.
What historical patterns are reflected in Munir's leadership?
Munir's leadership mirrors past military interventions in Pakistan, which have historically justified military rule with promises of national stability but have instead resulted in weakened governance.
What implications does the military's control have on civilian governance?
The military's control leads to civilian governments being seen as mere extensions of military authority, which diminishes the effectiveness and independence of democratic institutions.
How can citizens reclaim sovereignty in Pakistan?
Citizens can reclaim sovereignty by advocating for constitutional accountability and demanding a return to democratic principles that prioritize the welfare of the populace over military interests.
Nation Press