Mysuru Dasara row: Royal family's letter had suggestions, not diktats, says Pramoda Devi Wadiyar

Share:
Audio Loading voice…
Mysuru Dasara row: Royal family's letter had suggestions, not diktats, says Pramoda Devi Wadiyar

Synopsis

What started as a letter of suggestions from the Mysuru royal family has snowballed into a political flashpoint — with BJP demanding an apology, the state government defending its authority over the palace, and the royal family pushing back on police conduct and the golden howdah protocol. Chief Minister Shivakumar's promised conversation with Pramoda Devi Wadiyar may be the only off-ramp before this feud shapes next year's Dasara.

Key Takeaways

Pramoda Devi Wadiyar clarified on 4 November 2026 that her letter to the Karnataka government contained suggestions, not directives, about Mysuru Dasara management.
The royal family's objections centred on police conduct near specific gates and coordination failures during the Dasara 2026 celebrations.
She reiterated that the golden howdah and royal throne are private family property, outside any government legislation.
The family was reportedly not informed in advance about the elephant selected to carry the howdah, having to approach officials just five days before the event.
Shivakumar said he would look into the matter and speak with Pramoda Devi, while Minister Yathindra Siddaramaiah declined a BJP demand for an apology.

Member of the erstwhile Mysuru royal family, Pramoda Devi Wadiyar, on 4 November 2026 clarified at a press conference in Mysuru that her letter to the Karnataka state government contained only suggestions — not directives — aimed at improving the conduct of future Dasara celebrations. Chief Minister D.K. Shivakumar responded by saying he would examine her concerns and speak with her directly.

What Pramoda Devi Said

Pramoda Devi Wadiyar told reporters that her suggestions were intended to ensure the annual Dasara festivities are conducted smoothly in the years ahead, and that it was entirely within the government's discretion to accept or reject them. She was explicit that the royal family had not blamed the Karnataka government as a whole; their specific objection related to the behaviour and presence of state police during the celebrations.

On the prized golden howdah — the centrepiece of the Dasara procession — she reiterated that it remains the private property of the royal family and falls outside any government legislation. 'Neither the golden howdah nor the royal throne came under any government legislation,' she asserted, adding that both have historically belonged to the family and will continue to do so.

The Golden Howdah and Elephant Selection Dispute

Pramoda Devi clarified that the payment made by the government in connection with the golden howdah should not be characterised as a royalty fee. The standard protocol, she explained, is for the government to write to the royal family seeking permission to use the howdah for the procession, and the payment is made specifically in that context.

She also raised concerns about the process of selecting the elephant chosen to carry the golden howdah, stressing that the palace must be consulted before any such decision is finalised. 'This is not merely a matter of the royal family's rights. It is also about the safety of the elephant and lakhs of people. There should not be any risk to the mahout or the elephant,' she said.

Pointing to coordination failures during Mysuru Dasara 2026, she noted that the family had to approach the Deputy Conservator of Forests just five days before the event to find out which elephant had been selected — a lapse she described as a failure of official responsibility.

Chief Minister Shivakumar's Response

Chief Minister D.K. Shivakumar said he was unaware of the specific allegation that he had failed to act on an earlier assurance to address mismanagement. 'We hold the royal family of Karnataka in the highest regard. I cannot act merely on the basis of what you tell me, nor can I respond simply because the media poses a question in a particular manner. I will look into the matter and speak with her,' he said.

The Political Dimension

Minister Yathindra Siddaramaiah maintained that the Mysuru Palace and the Palace Board fall under state government jurisdiction, and that residential space is extended to the former royal family as a gesture of respect. He emphasised that the government does not use the Ambari free of charge and follows official protocols.

When Bharatiya Janata Party (BJP) leader B.Y. Vijayendra demanded an apology from the government, Yathindra declined, stating that the palace and surrounding lands belong to the state and that his earlier remarks were a direct response to Pramoda Devi's public statement. The BJP's demand adds a sharper political edge to what began as an administrative disagreement over festival management.

Background and Broader Context

The Mysuru Dasara is one of India's most prominent cultural festivals, drawing lakhs of visitors annually. The involvement of the erstwhile royal family has historically been both ceremonial and deeply symbolic. This dispute — over coordination, protocol, police conduct, and property rights — reflects a recurring tension between the family's traditional role and the state's administrative authority over public events held on what it considers government property. It is not the first time such frictions have surfaced around the festival, and the outcome of Shivakumar's promised conversation with Pramoda Devi will be closely watched ahead of the 2027 celebrations.

Point of View

Administratively sidelined. The Karnataka government's insistence that the palace and its lands are state property sits uneasily alongside its annual request to borrow the golden howdah, a transaction that implicitly acknowledges the family's ownership. The BJP's opportunistic demand for an apology adds noise without substance. The real question is whether the state can design a formal, documented protocol for Dasara management that respects both administrative authority and institutional memory — something the annual controversy suggests has not happened yet.
NationPress
4 Nov 2026

Frequently Asked Questions

What was the controversy about the Mysuru Dasara 2026 celebrations?
The controversy centred on alleged coordination failures during the Mysuru Dasara 2026 festivities, including the royal family not being informed in advance about the elephant chosen to carry the golden howdah, and objections to police conduct near specific gates. Pramoda Devi Wadiyar wrote to the Karnataka government with suggestions, which subsequently became a political flashpoint.
Does the golden howdah belong to the Mysuru royal family or the government?
Pramoda Devi Wadiyar has asserted that the golden howdah and the royal throne are the private property of the erstwhile Mysuru royal family and are not covered by any government legislation. The Karnataka government writes to the family each year seeking permission to use the howdah for the Dasara procession and makes a payment for its use.
What did Chief Minister D.K. Shivakumar say about the royal family's concerns?
Chief Minister D.K. Shivakumar said he holds the royal family of Karnataka in the highest regard and that he would look into the concerns raised and speak directly with Pramoda Devi Wadiyar. He added that he could not respond solely on the basis of media questions without first verifying the facts.
Why did the BJP get involved in the Mysuru Dasara dispute?
BJP leader B.Y. Vijayendra demanded an apology from the Karnataka government after Minister Yathindra Siddaramaiah stated that the Mysuru Palace and surrounding lands belong to the state government. Yathindra refused to apologise, saying his remarks were a direct response to Pramoda Devi Wadiyar's public statement.
What changes has the Mysuru royal family suggested for future Dasara celebrations?
Pramoda Devi Wadiyar has suggested that the palace be consulted in advance when selecting the elephant to carry the golden howdah, and that coordination among government departments and police be improved. She stressed these were non-binding suggestions aimed at ensuring the safety of the elephant, the mahout, and the lakhs of people attending the procession.
Nation Press
The Trail

Connected Dots

Tracing the thread behind this story — newest first.

8 Dots
  1. Latest 1 week ago
  2. 1 week ago
  3. 1 week ago
  4. 1 week ago
  5. 2 weeks ago
  6. 2 weeks ago
  7. 2 weeks ago
  8. 3 months ago
Google Prefer NP
On Google