'Nityanand Rai Labels Pappu Yadav's Claims as Misleading Rumors'
Synopsis
In a recent statement, MoS Nityanand Rai dismissed Pappu Yadav's claims about the formation of a new Union Territory involving Bihar and West Bengal as baseless rumors, urging the public to ignore such misinformation.
Key Takeaways
Nityanand Rai firmly denies the formation of a new Union Territory.
The allegations have been labeled as baseless and misleading .
Political tensions are escalating in Bihar and West Bengal .
Yadav's claims include merging several districts from both states.
MoS Rai urges the public to remain cautious about rumors .
Patna, March 7 (NationPress) The Minister of State for Home Affairs, Nityanand Rai, unequivocally rejected the assertions made by Rajesh Ranjan, also known as Pappu Yadav, an Independent MP representing Purnea in Bihar. Yadav claimed that there were plans to form a new Union Territory by amalgamating districts from Bihar and West Bengal.
In response to Yadav's social media allegations, MoS Rai stated that the Central government has no intention of merging districts from the two states to establish a Union Territory.
He described Yadav's claims as entirely unfounded and accused the Purnea MP of disseminating misleading information to the public.
"There is absolutely no validity to these assertions. Pappu Yadav's remarks lack any factual basis," MoS Rai emphasized, urging citizens to disregard such falsehoods.
On the previous day, Yadav had taken to social media platform X, alleging that the Bharatiya Janata Party (BJP) was plotting to impose President's Rule in West Bengal and create a new Union Territory.
According to Yadav's claims, this new Union Territory would encompass the Seemanchal region of Bihar along with districts from West Bengal, including Malda, Murshidabad, Raiganj, and Uttar Dinajpur.
Furthermore, Yadav suggested that this was part of a political conspiracy aimed at ousting Nitish Kumar from the Chief Minister's office in Bihar and appointing Lieutenant General Syed Ata Hasnain (retired), a military figure, as the state's Governor.
MoS Nityanand Rai dismissed these allegations decisively, asserting that Yadav's statements should not be taken seriously.
He reiterated that such claims are devoid of credibility and solely intended to create confusion among the public.
In light of MoS Rai's clarification, Pappu Yadav tweeted again on Saturday, implying that the current political events still raise significant questions.
"There's no smoke without fire," the Purnea MP commented, referencing the ongoing political dynamics in the region.
He also raised concerns regarding the appointment of Governors in Bihar and West Bengal, stating that if any Union Territory plan were to be enacted, it would face robust resistance.
Pappu Yadav warned of an economic blockade if such a decision were made.
This heated exchange has intensified the already charged political atmosphere in Bihar and the adjacent West Bengal.
Point of View
It's important to approach this situation with a focus on factual integrity. The exchange between Nityanand Rai and Pappu Yadav highlights the current political tensions in Bihar and West Bengal. While Yadav's claims have been dismissed as baseless, the reactions and implications of such claims are significant in the context of regional politics.
NationPress
6 Jul 2026
Frequently Asked Questions
What claims did Pappu Yadav make?
Pappu Yadav alleged that a new Union Territory would be formed by merging districts from Bihar and West Bengal.
How did Nityanand Rai respond?
Nityanand Rai rejected Yadav's claims as baseless and urged the public not to pay attention to such rumors.
What political implications did Yadav suggest?
Yadav suggested that the claims are part of a conspiracy to remove Nitish Kumar from the Chief Minister's position.
What districts did Yadav mention in his claims?
Yadav mentioned districts such as Malda, Murshidabad, Raiganj, and Uttar Dinajpur from West Bengal.
What did Yadav threaten if a Union Territory is created?
Yadav warned that there would be strong opposition, including the possibility of an economic blockade.
