Supriya Sule demands JPC on anti-paper leak Bill, SIT probe into police assault on protesters
Synopsis
NCP-SP's Supriya Sule took the Lok Sabha floor to demand both a Joint Parliamentary Committee to draft a leak-proof examination law and an SIT inquiry into alleged police violence against student protesters — framing the NEET crisis not as a partisan fight but as 'system versus aspirations.' Her citation of BJP ally Chaggan Bhujbal's criticism of the government's handling adds an unexpected edge to the ruling coalition's internal accountability deficit.
Key Takeaways
NCP-SP MP Supriya Sule demanded a JPC with Opposition members to draft a leak-proof anti-paper leak Bill during the Lok Sabha debate on Tuesday .
Sule also called for an SIT to probe alleged police brutality against student protesters across India during the paper leak agitation.
She questioned the government's timeline on the Public Examinations (Prevention of Unfair Means) Act, 2024 , noting a recommendations committee was formed just one day after the Act was passed on 21 June 2024 .
BJP MP Tejasvi Surya's 'delulu' remark about Opposition–youth connect drew a sharp retort from Sule on the House floor.
Sule cited NCP leader Chaggan Bhujbal's criticism of former Education Minister Dharmendra Pradhan , noting dissent within the ruling coalition itself.
She framed the debate as 'system versus aspirations,' dismissing claims of foreign funding behind the protests as something 'children were making memes over.'
NCP-SP MP Supriya Sule on Tuesday urged the Centre to constitute a Joint Parliamentary Committee (JPC) — with Opposition representation — to draft a robust anti-paper leak law, and simultaneously called for an independent probe into alleged police brutality against student protesters across India during the recent paper leak agitation.
Key Demands in Parliament
Speaking during the debate on the Public Examinations (Prevention of Unfair Means) Amendment Bill, 2026 in the Lok Sabha, Sule made two central demands: formation of a JPC to produce a 'leak-proof' examination law, and a transparent enquiry — ideally through a Special Investigation Team (SIT) — into what she described as 'horrific' scenes of alleged police action against youth agitators nationwide.
'If you really want to change the system, form a JPC, call every stakeholder and come up with a Bill that is leak proof… call an all-party meeting, we are all on the same side,' Sule said on the floor of the House.
Sule Hits Back at BJP's 'Delulu' Remark
Bharatiya Janata Party (BJP) MP Tejasvi Surya had earlier remarked: 'Because of this (paper leak) issue Opposition thinks that youth are with them, there can't be no greater delulu than this.' Sule responded pointedly: 'You too don't be in delulu that the youth are with you.'
The exchange underscored the sharpening political battle over who commands the moral authority on student grievances — a contest that has intensified since the NEET paper leak controversy erupted in 2024.
Criticism of the 2024 Act and Its Timeline
While acknowledging the drafting quality of the Public Examinations (Prevention of Unfair Means) Act, 2024 — 'Even if I am in Opposition, I will say that because this is not about arguing' — Sule raised sharp procedural questions about its rollout. She noted that the Act was passed on 21 June 2024, yet a recommendations committee was formed the very next day, on 22 June.
'Who is being made fun of? If there was no committee before, then what was the rush for the Bill?' she asked. She argued that had the Act been implemented promptly, 'we would not have to witness the Jantar Mantar protest.'
NEET Suicides, Coaching Inequality, and Allied Voices
Sule invoked the student suicides that followed the NEET paper leak, urging BJP MPs to speak 'with some compassion, empathy, humility and sympathy when it's about children.' She also questioned why the Centre had not engaged with the Dravida Munnetra Kazhagam (DMK) over its longstanding opposition to NEET, linking the controversy to the inequality between affluent and underprivileged students and the largely unregulated coaching-class industry.
Notably, Sule cited remarks by NCP leader Chaggan Bhujbal — a BJP ally — who had said that had former Education Minister Dharmendra Pradhan resigned fifteen days earlier, 'such a huge chaos would not have taken place.' 'Not only me but even the BJP's allies are saying this,' she observed, signalling that dissent on the issue cuts across the ruling coalition.
On Alleged Police Action and Foreign Funding Claims
Sule termed scenes of alleged police action against protesters as 'horrific' and demanded a transparent enquiry so that 'such a thing never gets repeated.' Responding to suggestions of foreign funding behind the protests, she was dismissive: 'Children were making memes over it.'
She framed her overall argument in systemic terms: 'This is not about UPA versus NDA, it is about system versus aspirations.' With the Amendment Bill still under parliamentary scrutiny, the demand for a JPC is likely to remain a flashpoint in both chambers.
Point of View
She avoids being painted as obstructionist while landing the sharper blow — that the government rushed legislation without the institutional groundwork to enforce it. The citation of Bhujbal, a BJP ally, is not incidental; it signals that the paper leak crisis has created fissures within the National Democratic Alliance that the Opposition intends to exploit. The 'system versus aspirations' framing is also a deliberate rebranding — it lifts the debate above party lines and positions NCP-SP as the voice of structural reform rather than political point-scoring. Whether the government agrees to a JPC will be the real test of whether it treats this as a governance failure or a communications problem.
NationPress
28 Jul 2026
Frequently Asked Questions
What did Supriya Sule demand in the Lok Sabha regarding the paper leak Bill?
Sule demanded that the Centre form a Joint Parliamentary Committee (JPC) with Opposition members to draft a comprehensive, leak-proof anti-paper leak law. She also called for an all-party meeting, saying 'we are all on the same side' on the issue.
Why did Supriya Sule call for an SIT probe?
Sule called for a Special Investigation Team (SIT) inquiry into alleged police brutality against student protesters across India during the paper leak agitation. She described the scenes as 'horrific' and said a transparent enquiry was necessary to ensure such incidents are not repeated.
What was Supriya Sule's criticism of the Public Examinations Act, 2024?
Sule questioned the government's rollout, pointing out that the Act was passed on 21 June 2024 but a recommendations committee was formed the very next day. She argued this sequencing undermined the legislation's credibility and that prompt implementation could have prevented the Jantar Mantar protests.
What was the 'delulu' exchange between Supriya Sule and Tejasvi Surya?
BJP MP Tejasvi Surya had said that the Opposition believing youth are with them over the paper leak issue was the 'greatest delulu.' Sule fired back on the floor of the House, telling Surya: 'You too don't be in delulu that the youth are with you.'
Which BJP ally did Supriya Sule cite to strengthen her argument?
Sule cited NCP leader Chaggan Bhujbal, who had said that had former Education Minister Dharmendra Pradhan resigned fifteen days earlier, the 'huge chaos' could have been avoided. Sule used this to argue that even the ruling coalition's own allies were holding the government accountable.
