Will Suresh Gopi Face Charges Over Voter List Manipulation?
Synopsis
Key Takeaways
- Kerala Police found no evidence against Gopi.
- Allegations were made by Congress leader T.N. Prathapan.
- Gopi won the 2024 elections by a significant margin.
- The case could be reopened with new evidence.
- This incident reflects ongoing concerns about electoral integrity.
Thrissur, Sep 16 (NationPress) In a significant turn of events, the Kerala Police have opted not to pursue a case against Union Minister Suresh Gopi, following allegations of voter list tampering brought forth by Congress leader and former Thrissur MP T.N. Prathapan.
Actor-turned-politician Gopi secured victory in the Thrissur constituency during the 2024 Lok Sabha elections, marking a crucial moment for the BJP as they made their debut in the Lok Sabha from Kerala.
He emerged victorious with a remarkable margin of over 70,000 votes, but since then, accusations of extensive voter list manipulation have surfaced.
Prathapan, who held the Thrissur MP seat from 2019 to 2024, chose not to run again, leading the Congress party to nominate K. Muraleedharan, the sitting MP from Badagara.
Despite finishing third in the previous elections, Gopi's substantial win pushed the Congress candidate down to third place, with former State Agriculture Minister and CPI leader V.S. Sunil Kumar taking second place.
Following Gopi's victory, Prathapan filed a complaint alleging that he and his sibling had falsified documents to illegitimately register their votes in Thrissur. The complaint accused the Union Minister of intentionally providing fabricated evidence to gain an electoral edge.
However, after a preliminary investigation, the police determined that there was a lack of sufficient evidence to support the claims. Official sources indicated that Prathapan did not provide the necessary documents to substantiate the alleged forgery. Consequently, the police informed Prathapan that a case could not be initiated at this point.
The City Police Commissioner clarified that this decision was based on the interim inquiry report, which revealed no substantive evidence to pursue further action.
“The lack of credible documentation hinders us from advancing with a case,” stated the Commissioner.
Nevertheless, the police did not entirely dismiss the possibility of revisiting the matter.
They mentioned that if further documentation is provided by the District Administration or the Election Commission, the issue will be reassessed.
“Any additional evidence submitted by relevant authorities will be thoroughly evaluated, and the case can be reopened if deemed necessary,” the statement concluded.