Delhi High Court Declares FSSAI’s Cattle Feed Regulation Invalid

Share:
Audio Loading voice…
Delhi High Court Declares FSSAI’s Cattle Feed Regulation Invalid

Synopsis

In a landmark decision, the Delhi High Court has ruled that the FSSAI lacks jurisdiction over cattle feed regulations. The court emphasized that such authority is outside the purview of the Food Safety and Standards Act, 2006, signaling a significant shift in regulatory oversight.

Key Takeaways

Delhi High Court ruling: FSSAI lacks authority over cattle feed regulations.
Regulatory oversight: The ruling emphasizes clear boundaries in agricultural regulation.
BIS certification: The court invalidated mandatory BIS standards for cattle feed.
Focus on food safety: FSSAI’s jurisdiction is strictly limited to food for human consumption.
Legal implications: The decision may lead to the establishment of new regulations for animal feed.

New Delhi, April 7 (NationPress) The Delhi High Court delivered a significant judgment on Tuesday, asserting that the Food Safety and Standards Authority of India (FSSAI) lacks the authority to oversee the regulation of animal or cattle feed. This decision indicates that such regulatory powers are beyond the boundaries defined by the Food Safety and Standards Act, 2006.

A division bench comprising Chief Justice Devendra Kumar Upadhyaya and Justice Tejas Karia dismissed a petition from Godrej Agrovet Ltd, thereby annulling Note (c) associated with Regulation 2.5.2 of the Food Safety and Standards (Food Products Standards and Food Additives) Regulations.

The court determined that the contested provision, which forbade the use of meat and bone meal in feed for milk and meat-producing animals while requiring compliance with BIS standards for commercial feed, was deemed ultra vires the primary statute.

The bench noted, "Any regulation enacted by the Food Authority that pertains to cattle feed or animal feed transcends the limits of the Act, 2006," further clarifying that the original statute confines the jurisdiction of the FSSAI strictly to food intended for human consumption.

"The structural design of the Act is such that its provisions are intended solely for regulating food for human consumption and do not extend to feed for cattle or other animals," the court further remarked.

Additionally, the Delhi High Court asserted that terms like "food safety", "primary food", and "unsafe food" as stated in the Food Safety and Standards Act, 2006, cannot be broadly interpreted to encompass cattle feed or animal feed.

"Given the absence of explicit inclusion of any substance categorized as food for animal consumption or cattle feed in the definition clause, it is our considered view that the FSSAI's functions are exclusively related to food for human consumption and do not extend to animal or cattle feed," the ruling stated.

Utilizing established principles of delegated legislation, the bench concluded that the FSSAI had overstepped its rule-making authority.

"We confidently conclude that the contested Regulations fall outside the jurisdiction of the Act, 2006, and thus, are ultra vires the Act itself," the ruling affirmed.

The bench also invalidated directives issued by the FSSAI in 2019, 2020, and 2021 that mandated BIS certification for commercial cattle feed, clarifying that such standards are voluntary unless explicitly notified by the Central government.

"The imposition of any BIS standard as mandatory is within the purview of the Central Government... and in the absence of such directives, the Food Authority lacked the competence to require the BIS standard to be mandatory," the Delhi High Court stated.

"While it is possible for BIS standards to be made mandatory for commercial feeds, appropriate legal recourse would need to be followed for that purpose," it concluded.

Point of View

The Delhi High Court's ruling emphasizes the importance of clearly defined regulatory boundaries. It highlights the need for appropriate legislation governing animal feed, ensuring that the FSSAI's focus remains on food safety for human consumption without overreaching into agricultural regulation.
NationPress
20 Jun 2026

Frequently Asked Questions

What was the main ruling of the Delhi High Court regarding FSSAI?
The Delhi High Court ruled that the FSSAI does not have the authority to regulate animal or cattle feed, as such powers are outside the scope of the Food Safety and Standards Act, 2006.
What did the court say about the BIS certification for cattle feed?
The court struck down the FSSAI's requirement for BIS certification for commercial cattle feed, clarifying that such standards are voluntary unless mandated by the Central government.
What does 'ultra vires' mean in this context?
'Ultra vires' refers to actions taken beyond the legal authority granted to an organization or individual, in this case, the FSSAI exceeding its regulatory powers.
How does this ruling affect the agricultural sector?
This ruling could significantly impact the agricultural sector by clarifying the regulatory framework and ensuring that animal feed regulations are governed by appropriate legislation.
Can BIS standards for cattle feed be made mandatory?
Yes, BIS standards can be made mandatory, but it requires appropriate legal procedures to be followed by the Central Government.
Nation Press
The Trail

Connected Dots

Tracing the thread behind this story — newest first.

8 Dots
  1. Latest 1 week ago
  2. 3 months ago
  3. 3 months ago
  4. 4 months ago
  5. 6 months ago
  6. 8 months ago
  7. 1 year ago
  8. 1 year ago
Google Prefer NP
On Google