Hegseth calls for 'balanced' OPCON transfer to South Korea, honours US military roles
Synopsis
Key Takeaways
US Defence Secretary Pete Hegseth on Saturday, 30 May called for a 'balanced' approach to the transfer of wartime operational control (OPCON) to South Korea, insisting that the decades-long roles of US military personnel must be 'honoured' as the transition is phased in. Hegseth made the remarks at the Shangri-La Dialogue in Singapore, where diverging timelines between Seoul and Washington over the OPCON handover have come into sharper focus.
What Hegseth Said
'I think we have to find the balance of where our military plans and the responsibilities that US uniformed members have had for decades now (are) honoured, as we phase over to wartime OPCON transfer for the Republic of Korea, which we welcome the fact that they want that,' Hegseth said during the Asia Security Summit.
He described South Korea's eagerness to retake wartime OPCON as a 'breath of fresh air,' adding that the ally's desire to regain control 'more quickly' was 'an instinct we want to continue to incentivise.' He further noted that a faster transition would provide 'even more optionality for both the Koreans and the United States' on the Korean Peninsula.
The Timeline Dispute
Seoul has proposed retaking wartime OPCON from Washington as early as 2028, aiming to complete the handover before the Lee Jae Myung administration's five-year term concludes in 2030. However, doubts have emerged over whether Washington shares that urgency.
US Forces Korea (USFK) Commander Gen. Xavier Brunson, also present at the Singapore forum, suggested the two sides aim to meet the conditions required for OPCON transfer by no later than the first quarter of 2029 — a timeline that falls short of Seoul's preferred window. Brunson stressed the importance of ensuring 'the right capabilities, the right place and the right time' before any transition is formalised.
Historical Context
South Korea handed over operational control of its troops to the US-led UN Command during the 1950–53 Korean War. Control was subsequently transferred to the allies' Combined Forces Command when that command was established in 1978. The question of repatriation has been a recurring point of negotiation between Seoul and Washington for decades, reflecting South Korea's evolving military capabilities and its desire for greater strategic autonomy.
Nuclear Submarine Programme
On South Korea's push for a nuclear-powered submarine programme, Hegseth reaffirmed US support for allies seeking to expand their own undersea warfare capacity. 'Allies and partners seeking similar capabilities in their own defence and in regional stability makes a lot of sense to us,' he said, framing such acquisitions as enhancing deterrence and regional stability on the Korean Peninsula and beyond.
What Comes Next
The gap between Seoul's 2028 target and Washington's implied early 2029 readiness benchmark will likely dominate bilateral defence talks in the months ahead. With the Lee administration's political clock ticking, pressure on both capitals to align on a credible, conditions-based roadmap is expected to intensify through the remainder of 2025.