Nagaur MP Beniwal flags mosque demolitions in Rajasthan border areas in Lok Sabha

Share:
Audio Loading voice…
Nagaur MP Beniwal flags mosque demolitions in Rajasthan border areas in Lok Sabha

Synopsis

Nagaur MP Hanuman Beniwal took the demolition of mosques and religious structures in Rajasthan's Barmer border belt to the floor of the Lok Sabha on Tuesday, naming six specific sites and demanding a central fact-finding team — a move that puts the Centre's border-area demolition policy directly in the parliamentary spotlight.

Key Takeaways

Hanuman Beniwal (RLP, Nagaur) raised the issue under Rule 377 in the Lok Sabha on Tuesday .
He alleged demolitions of mosques and residential structures in Barmer district , Rajasthan's border belt, without due process or community consent.
Six sites were specifically named: Jama Masjid Siyai , Jama Masjid Mekan Ka Par , Jama Masjid Kerkori , Jama Masjid Rampura (Daheva) , Dargah Sayed Gul Mohammad Shah , and Bhalgaon Bakhasar .
Beniwal addressed his remarks directly to Union Home Minister Amit Shah .
He demanded the Centre send a central team to assess the situation and called for transparency, legal due process, and sensitivity in future actions.

Hanuman Beniwal, Rashtriya Loktantrik Party (RLP) National President and Nagaur Member of Parliament, on Tuesday raised the issue of alleged demolition of religious sites and residential structures in the border areas of Rajasthan before the Lok Sabha, drawing attention to multiple incidents in the Barmer parliamentary constituency. Beniwal invoked Rule 377 to place the matter on record and directly addressed Union Home Minister Amit Shah.

What Beniwal Alleged

The RLP leader alleged that several religious sites associated with the Muslim community — along with residential premises — had been demolished in border areas, including Barmer district, without adequate consultation or the consent of those affected. He specifically named Jama Masjid Siyai, Jama Masjid Mekan Ka Par, Jama Masjid Kerkori, Jama Masjid Rampura (Daheva), Dargah Sayed Gul Mohammad Shah, and Bhalgaon Bakhasar as sites where demolitions had reportedly taken place.

Beniwal maintained that these incidents had generated considerable resentment and anger among sections of the local population in the region.

Beniwal's Constitutional Argument

While acknowledging that national security must remain paramount, Beniwal argued that the Constitution of India also guarantees citizens the right to religion and protects the sanctity of religious places. He stressed that any demolition undertaken for administrative or security reasons must follow due legal procedure and be carried out through a transparent, consultative process.

According to Beniwal, demolitions conducted without engaging local residents or adhering to established legal norms had deepened grievances in the border belt. He called on the government to exercise sensitivity when dealing with religious sites in such areas.

Key Demands Before Parliament

Beniwal urged the Centre to dispatch a central team to the affected locations in Barmer to independently assess the situation on the ground. He also called for measures to ensure the dignity and sanctity of religious places are protected going forward.

Emphasising the need for equal respect across all faiths, Beniwal said he would continue to raise issues of injustice affecting people irrespective of their religion or community background.

Broader Context

This comes amid a wider national debate over the legal framework governing demolitions of structures — both residential and religious — in areas close to international borders and in disputed zones. Several opposition leaders across parties have raised similar concerns in recent months, citing due-process violations. Notably, the Supreme Court has in the past issued guidelines requiring authorities to follow prescribed procedures before undertaking demolitions, particularly those involving places of worship.

The Centre has not yet formally responded to Beniwal's specific allegations as of the time of this report. How the government addresses the demand for a central fact-finding team will be closely watched by communities in the affected border districts.

Point of View

And parliamentary pressure of this kind is one of the few mechanisms that can force accountability onto the record.
NationPress
11 Aug 2026

Frequently Asked Questions

What did Nagaur MP Hanuman Beniwal raise in the Lok Sabha?
Hanuman Beniwal raised the alleged demolition of mosques and other religious sites in the border areas of Rajasthan's Barmer district, arguing the demolitions were carried out without due legal process or community consent. He invoked Rule 377 and addressed his remarks to Union Home Minister Amit Shah.
Which religious sites were named by Beniwal in his Lok Sabha speech?
Beniwal specifically named Jama Masjid Siyai, Jama Masjid Mekan Ka Par, Jama Masjid Kerkori, Jama Masjid Rampura (Daheva), Dargah Sayed Gul Mohammad Shah, and Bhalgaon Bakhasar as sites where demolitions had allegedly taken place in Barmer district.
What did Beniwal demand from the Centre?
Beniwal demanded that the Centre dispatch a central fact-finding team to the affected locations in Barmer to assess the ground situation and ensure the dignity and sanctity of religious places are protected. He also called for transparent, legally compliant procedures for any future demolitions in border areas.
Did Beniwal oppose security measures in border areas?
No. Beniwal explicitly stated that national security must remain paramount, but argued that security imperatives do not override constitutional guarantees of the right to religion. He insisted any demolitions for administrative or security reasons must follow due legal procedure and involve community consultation.
What is Rule 377 under which Beniwal raised this issue?
Rule 377 of the Lok Sabha Rules of Procedure allows members to raise matters of urgent public importance that are not covered under other parliamentary business. It gives MPs a formal channel to place issues on the parliamentary record and draw ministerial attention without a full debate.
Nation Press
The Trail

Connected Dots

Tracing the thread behind this story — newest first.

8 Dots
  1. Latest 1 week ago
  2. 1 month ago
  3. 1 month ago
  4. 1 month ago
  5. 2 months ago
  6. 2 months ago
  7. 1 year ago
  8. 1 year ago
Google Prefer NP
On Google