Bhujbal slams Jarange Patil's rhetoric, reveals cabinet fury over Maratha quota stir

Share:
Audio Loading voice…
Bhujbal slams Jarange Patil's rhetoric, reveals cabinet fury over Maratha quota stir

Synopsis

Maharashtra Minister Chhagan Bhujbal has gone public with a cabinet-level frustration: Maratha activist Manoj Jarange Patil's rhetoric — targeting the Chief Minister's father, ministers, and a female District Collector — has breached limits even the ruling Mahayuti coalition can no longer absorb quietly. With 12 of 13 demands met and one legally contested, the OBC-Maratha fault line is now openly splitting Maharashtra's ruling alliance.

Key Takeaways

Chhagan Bhujbal on 16 September publicly condemned Manoj Jarange Patil's rhetoric as crossing legal and ethical lines.
Cabinet ministers reportedly expressed collective frustration over Jarange Patil targeting the Chief Minister's father , Chandrakant Bawankule , and a female District Collector .
The government has accommodated 12 out of 13 demands from the Maratha agitation; the remaining one is deemed legally untenable.
Bhujbal warned that funds for the Maratha community must equally reach OBCs , who he says provided 60–70% of the Mahayuti vote.
He credited the coalition's electoral win to the Ladki Bahin scheme and leadership of Ajit Pawar and Devendra Fadnavis , dismissing Jarange Patil's role.
Bhujbal backed Dhananjay Munde's cabinet inclusion and said the Finance portfolio should return to the NCP.

Nationalist Congress Party (NCP) leader and Maharashtra Minister Chhagan Bhujbal on Wednesday, 16 September launched a pointed attack on Maratha reservation activist Manoj Jarange Patil, condemning his escalating rhetoric and calling out what he described as unbridled verbal attacks on political leaders, their families, and administrative officials. The broadside came as the Maratha quota agitation continues to roil Maharashtra's political landscape.

Cabinet Ministers Voice Collective Outrage

Minister Bhujbal disclosed that cabinet colleagues had recently expressed deep frustration over Jarange Patil's conduct in informal discussions following official cabinet sessions. He revealed that the activist had targeted the Chief Minister's father, cabinet colleague Chandrakant Bawankule, and even a female District Collector — remarks that, according to Bhujbal, crossed all acceptable limits.

Describing Jarange Patil's campaign as an 'unstoppable train', the minister said, 'Better late than never', welcoming the fact that colleagues had finally begun speaking out against the mounting vitriol. He indicated that the silence from within government had gone on too long.

Beed Unrest and the Limits of Accommodation

Bhujbal recalled the severe unrest in Beed, where MLAs' houses and hotels were reportedly torched while police were rendered ineffective. He defended his decision to speak publicly and visit the affected areas, framing it as a matter of accountability rather than provocation.

He noted that the government had already accommodated 12 out of 13 demands put forward by the agitation, but that the remaining demand was, in his assessment, legally untenable. 'How far can authorities bend legal rules to appease protesters?' he questioned, signalling a firm stance on the unresolved sticking point.

OBC Interests and the Quota Debate

The minister argued that any funds being directed toward the Maratha community must be extended equally to Other Backward Classes (OBCs) to protect their entitlements. He reminded the government that 60 to 70 per cent of OBCs had voted for the Mahayuti alliance, implying that their interests cannot be sidelined in any quota settlement.

Bhujbal also dismissed claims that Jarange Patil's mobilisation played a decisive role in the Mahayuti coalition's recent electoral success. He instead attributed the victory to welfare initiatives such as the Ladki Bahin scheme and to the leadership of Ajit Pawar and Devendra Fadnavis. Notably, he pointed out that despite Jarange Patil fielding and then withdrawing candidates — and specifically targeting Bhujbal in his own Yeola constituency — the minister retained his seat.

NCP's Claims on Finance Portfolio and Dhananjay Munde

Turning to other political matters, Minister Bhujbal stated that the Finance portfolio should ideally return to the NCP within the coalition arrangement. He also voiced strong backing for Dhananjay Munde's inclusion in the state cabinet, describing him as an influential leader representing a large community — while clarifying that the final call rests with party leadership.

As the Maratha agitation enters a fresh phase, the public rift between state ministers and Jarange Patil is likely to intensify pressure on the Mahayuti government to find a legally defensible resolution before tensions spill further into administrative and electoral territory.

Point of View

And accommodating Jarange Patil's final demand — apparently illegal on its face — risks a counter-mobilisation that could cost the alliance more votes than the Maratha agitation ever threatened to win. What mainstream coverage underplays is the structural tension: the same coalition that won on a welfare-and-stability pitch is now being pulled in two directions by two communities whose quota interests are arithmetically incompatible. The Beed violence and the attacks on a female District Collector suggest the agitation has moved beyond legitimate protest into territory that tests rule-of-law credentials. How Devendra Fadnavis navigates this without alienating either bloc will define his government's durability more than any single policy announcement.
NationPress
16 Sept 2026

Frequently Asked Questions

Why did Chhagan Bhujbal criticise Manoj Jarange Patil?
Bhujbal condemned Jarange Patil for making aggressive verbal attacks on political leaders, their family members, and administrative officials — including the Chief Minister's father and a female District Collector. He said cabinet ministers had collectively expressed outrage over this rhetoric in private and that it was time to speak out publicly.
What is the current status of the Maratha reservation demands?
According to Bhujbal, the Maharashtra government has accepted 12 out of 13 demands put forward by the Maratha agitation. The one outstanding demand has been described as legally untenable, and the government has indicated it cannot accommodate it without violating existing law.
How does the Maratha quota row affect OBCs in Maharashtra?
Bhujbal argued that any funds or reservations allocated to the Maratha community must be matched for OBCs to protect their interests. He highlighted that 60 to 70 per cent of OBCs voted for the Mahayuti alliance, framing OBC rights as a political and constitutional obligation the government cannot ignore.
Did Manoj Jarange Patil influence the Mahayuti alliance's election victory?
Bhujbal rejected claims that Jarange Patil contributed to the coalition's success. He attributed the win to welfare schemes like the Ladki Bahin initiative and the leadership of Ajit Pawar and Devendra Fadnavis, noting that Bhujbal himself won in Yeola despite Jarange Patil directly targeting him.
What were Bhujbal's remarks on the NCP's cabinet demands?
Bhujbal stated that the Finance portfolio should ideally return to the NCP and expressed strong support for Dhananjay Munde's inclusion in the Maharashtra cabinet, describing him as a key leader representing a significant community. He clarified that the final decision on both matters rests with party leadership.
Nation Press
The Trail

Connected Dots

Tracing the thread behind this story — newest first.

8 Dots
  1. Latest 1 week ago
  2. 2 weeks ago
  3. 3 months ago
  4. 1 year ago
  5. 1 year ago
  6. 1 year ago
  7. 1 year ago
  8. 1 year ago
Google Prefer NP
On Google