Calcutta HC orders West Bengal Police report on accused paraded with ropes

Share:
Audio Loading voice…
Calcutta HC orders West Bengal Police report on accused paraded with ropes

Synopsis

The Calcutta High Court has pulled up West Bengal Police over footage of arrested persons being walked through public streets with ropes around their waists — a practice the bench called a public defamation of the accused. With a three-week deadline for a police report, the case puts a spotlight on custodial dignity and the limits of police discretion during arrest.

Key Takeaways

A division vacation bench of the Calcutta High Court comprising Justice Jay Sengupta and Justice Smita Das De took up the matter on 5 June .
The bench ordered the West Bengal Police to submit a detailed report within three weeks on the practice of parading accused persons with ropes around their waists.
The court stated that no accused can be 'defamed in such a manner in the name of arrest', regardless of the charges against them.
Police counsel said the practice occurred in extortion cases where accused were taken to the crime scene to recreate events.
The court stressed that while preventing escape is a police duty, the personal dignity of the accused must also be protected.
The next hearing is scheduled after four weeks .

A division vacation bench of the Calcutta High Court on Friday, 5 June directed the West Bengal Police to submit a detailed report within three weeks on complaints that arrested persons were being paraded through public streets with ropes tied around their waists. The bench, comprising Justice Jay Sengupta and Justice Smita Das De, made the order after hearing a petition triggered by viral social media footage of at least two such incidents.

What the Court Observed

The bench made its position unambiguous: regardless of the severity of the charges against an accused, the police have no authority to publicly humiliate a person following arrest. Justice Sengupta stated from the bench, 'The police can surely arrest an accused and take action against the accused persons as per the legal provisions. If the guilt is proved, then there are even provisions for the death penalty. But surely, no accused persons can be defamed in such a manner in the name of arrest.'

The court also questioned the specific circumstances that led officers to tie ropes around the waists of the accused, pressing police counsel for a factual explanation.

Police Explanation and Court's Counter

The state government's counsel informed the bench that in most of the reported incidents, the accused had been arrested on extortion charges and were subsequently taken back to the scene of the alleged crime to help officers recreate the sequence of events. The bench, however, immediately questioned whether such a procedure implied a genuine risk of the accused attempting to flee custody.

The court acknowledged that police are duty-bound to take all necessary precautions to prevent escape. Notably, it balanced that obligation against an equally firm principle — that the personal dignity of an accused person must be respected by law-enforcement officers at every stage of the process, including during arrest and transit.

Background and Legal Context

The petition before the court followed reports of the incidents spreading widely on social media, drawing public attention to a practice that critics argue violates the constitutional protections available even to persons accused of crimes. Under Article 21 of the Indian Constitution, the right to life and personal liberty — which courts have interpreted to include the right to dignity — extends to accused persons and cannot be curtailed outside due process.

This is not the first time Indian courts have been called upon to address the conduct of police during and after arrests. High courts across the country have, on multiple occasions, reminded law-enforcement agencies that an arrest does not strip an individual of fundamental rights.

Next Steps

The West Bengal Police is required to place its detailed report before the bench within the next three weeks. The matter is next listed for hearing after four weeks, at which point the court is expected to examine the police response and determine whether further directions are warranted.

Point of View

Rather than a verbal assurance, signals that the court intends to hold the state to account. If the police response is inadequate, this case could become a vehicle for binding guidelines on custodial conduct in West Bengal — and a reference point for similar petitions elsewhere.
NationPress
10 Aug 2026

Frequently Asked Questions

Why did the Calcutta High Court seek a report from West Bengal Police?
The Calcutta High Court sought a report after a petition was filed over viral social media footage showing arrested persons being paraded through public streets with ropes tied around their waists. The bench found the practice potentially violative of the dignity of the accused and directed police to explain the circumstances within three weeks.
What did the court say about the rights of accused persons?
The bench, led by Justice Jay Sengupta, stated that regardless of the crime alleged, the police cannot publicly defame an accused after arrest. It noted that even where the death penalty is a possible outcome upon conviction, the dignity of the accused must be respected during the arrest process.
What reason did the West Bengal Police give for the practice?
The state government's counsel told the court that in most reported cases, the accused were arrested on extortion charges and were taken back to the crime scene with ropes to help officers recreate the alleged incident.
When is the next hearing in this case?
The next hearing before the division vacation bench of the Calcutta High Court is scheduled after four weeks, by which time the West Bengal Police is required to have submitted its detailed report.
What legal right protects the dignity of an accused person in India?
Article 21 of the Indian Constitution guarantees the right to life and personal liberty, which the Supreme Court and various High Courts have interpreted to include the right to dignity. This protection extends to persons accused of crimes and cannot be curtailed outside due process of law.
Nation Press
The Trail

Connected Dots

Tracing the thread behind this story — newest first.

8 Dots
  1. Latest 1 week ago
  2. 1 month ago
  3. 9 months ago
  4. 1 year ago
  5. 1 year ago
  6. 1 year ago
  7. 1 year ago
  8. 1 year ago
Google Prefer NP
On Google