Why Did the MP-MLA Court Serve Notices to Three Congress Legislators in Jabalpur?

Click to start listening
Why Did the MP-MLA Court Serve Notices to Three Congress Legislators in Jabalpur?

Synopsis

In a significant legal development, the MP-MLA court in Jabalpur has issued notices to three Congress legislators, including Umang Singhar, in a defamation case. This case stems from allegations of corruption and misconduct, raising questions about accountability within political ranks. With a court appearance set for January 2026, the issue continues to unfold amidst ongoing protests in the state Assembly.

Key Takeaways

  • MP-MLA court issues notices to three Congress legislators.
  • Defamation case filed by NHM District Programme Manager Vijay Pandey.
  • Allegations involve fake documents and corruption.
  • Congress leaders scheduled to appear in court on January 26, 2026.
  • Ongoing protests in the state Assembly highlight political tensions.

Jabalpur/Bhopal, Dec 4 (NationPress) - The MP-MLA court located in Madhya Pradesh's Jabalpur district has issued formal notices to three incumbent Congress MLAs, notably the Leader of the Opposition (LoP) in the state Assembly, Umang Singhar, along with prominent leaders Ajay Singh and Lakhan Ghanghoria.

These notices were dispatched as part of a defamation case lodged against these Congress leaders, who are required to present their responses.

The court has summoned all three Congress representatives to appear on January 26, 2026.

The defamation suit was initiated by Vijay Pandey, the District Programme Manager of the National Health Mission (NHM).

The controversy began when senior Congress MLA Lakhan Ghanghoria raised this issue in August via a calling attention motion.

Ghanghoria claimed that Vijay Pandey’s higher secondary marksheet was fraudulent and accused him of engaging in corrupt practices as the district programme manager (DPM).

Following this, the Congress party brought the matter to the state Assembly, alleging that the BJP government was protecting Pandey.

After a walkout from the Assembly, the three Congress leaders held a press conference.

Deputy Chief Minister Rajendra Shukla, who oversees the Health and Family Welfare Department, established a committee to look into the allegations.

The inquiry concluded that the claims against Vijay Pandey were both 'incorrect' and 'baseless.'

In response, Vijay Pandey filed a defamation suit against Umang Singhar, former LoP Ajay Singh, and Jabalpur East MLA Lakhan Ghanghoria.

This development coincides with the ongoing five-day Winter session of the State Assembly, where Congress legislators, under the leadership of LoP Singhar, are actively protesting against the BJP-led state government.

Point of View

It's essential to recognize the implications of this case on political integrity. The issuance of court notices to prominent legislators like Umang Singhar and others raises serious questions about the accountability of elected officials. The ongoing protests reflect a broader discontent with governance that demands attention.
NationPress
05/12/2025

Frequently Asked Questions

What is the defamation case about?
The defamation case involves allegations made by District Programme Manager Vijay Pandey against Congress MLAs Umang Singhar, Ajay Singh, and Lakhan Ghanghoria.
When are the Congress leaders required to appear in court?
The Congress leaders have been summoned to appear in court on January 26, 2026.
What allegations were made against Vijay Pandey?
Lakhan Ghanghoria claimed that Vijay Pandey's higher secondary marksheet was fake and accused him of corruption.
What was the result of the inquiry into the allegations?
The inquiry concluded that the allegations against Vijay Pandey were incorrect and baseless.
What is the current political climate regarding this case?
The situation has intensified with ongoing protests led by Congress legislators in the state Assembly.
Nation Press