Delhi HC orders Meta to pull AI-generated videos linking Shervani to Atiq Ahmed

Share:
Audio Loading voice…
Delhi HC orders Meta to pull AI-generated videos linking Shervani to Atiq Ahmed

Synopsis

A Delhi court has ordered Meta to pull two AI-generated videos within 36 hours that falsely cast a five-time Lok Sabha MP as an Atiq Ahmed associate — a case that spotlights how deepfake technology is being weaponised for political defamation in India, and how slowly platforms respond even after legal notice.

Key Takeaways

The Delhi High Court on 4 August 2025 directed Meta to remove two AI-generated videos within 36 hours .
The videos falsely linked former Union Minister Saleem Iqbal Shervani , 73, to deceased gangster Atiq Ahmed .
Content was allegedly published on 13 July by the 'Jan Chaupal Post' accounts, operated by Rahul Mishra .
The suit alleges the videos used AI to fabricate Shervani's face, voice, and dialogues and sought to inflame communal sentiments.
Shervani has sought ₹2.01 crore in damages and disclosure of account subscriber information.
Meta allegedly failed to remove the content despite prior legal notices.

The Delhi High Court on Tuesday, 4 August 2025, directed Meta Platforms Inc. to remove two allegedly AI-generated videos from Facebook and Instagram within 36 hours, after former Union Minister and five-time Lok Sabha MP Saleem Iqbal Shervani filed a suit claiming the fabricated content falsely depicted him as an associate of deceased gangster Atiq Ahmed. The interim order was passed by a single-judge Bench of Justice Tushar Rao Gedela.

What the Court Ordered

Justice Gedela directed Meta to take down the specific video URLs within 36 hours and restrained Defendant No. 2 and Defendant No. 3 from publishing or republishing the videos until further orders. The court also permitted Shervani to approach Meta directly if the same videos are re-uploaded by any other person or entity.

'It appears appropriate to direct Defendant No.1 to take down the following URLs… in 36 hours. Defendants 2 and 3 are restrained from republishing or publishing the videos until further orders,' the court stated in its interim order.

What the Videos Allegedly Showed

According to the plaint, the two videos were published on 13 July by a self-described journalist operating the 'Jan Chaupal Post' social media accounts. Shervani, 73, alleged the content was entirely AI-generated — artificially recreating his face, voice, dialogues, and scenes — to falsely portray him as a factory owner who sought Atiq Ahmed's help to violently suppress a workers' strike and later assisted the gangster in consolidating criminal influence in Allahabad (now Prayagraj).

The suit stated that 'not one of the events shown in the impugned videos ever took place' and asserted that across a public life spanning more than four decades, Shervani 'never had any association whatsoever with Atiq Ahmed or with any criminal.'

Communal Angle and Platform Inaction Alleged

The former minister also alleged that the videos deliberately sought to inflame communal sentiments by introducing fictional characters identified with different religious communities and depicting violence between them for sensationalism and online engagement. The plaint further alleged that despite legal notices being served, the videos remained accessible on Meta's platforms, with the company failing to act on the notifications.

Defendants Named and Relief Sought

The suit named Meta Platforms Inc. as Defendant No. 1; Rahul Mishra, who allegedly operates the 'Jan Chaupal Post' accounts, as Defendant No. 2; Ranjeet Singh, who allegedly republished the videos, as Defendant No. 3; and unknown entities as John Doe defendants. Shervani has sought disclosure of the Basic Subscriber Information of the accounts involved, an unconditional public apology, and damages of ₹2.01 crore against the alleged creators and republishers.

Shervani was represented by Advocates J Amal Anand, Abhishek Singh, KV Vibu Prasad, Elvin Joshy, Shivani Kalra, and Akshat Mishra. The matter is expected to be heard again for further directions as the court's interim order remains in force.

Point of View

And platforms have shown they will not act without judicial compulsion. The communal-incitement angle alleged here raises the stakes further: AI-fabricated content that assigns religious identities to fictional violence is not just a reputational tort, it is a potential public-order threat. The ₹2.01 crore damages claim, if awarded, would set a precedent, but the harder question is whether disclosure of subscriber data will actually identify the originators or hit a dead end of VPNs and fake accounts.
NationPress
4 Aug 2026

Frequently Asked Questions

What did the Delhi High Court order in the Saleem Iqbal Shervani case?
The Delhi High Court directed Meta Platforms Inc. to remove two AI-generated videos from Facebook and Instagram within 36 hours and restrained the alleged creators and republishers from posting the content again until further orders. The interim order was passed on 4 August 2025 by Justice Tushar Rao Gedela.
What did the AI-generated videos falsely claim about Shervani?
The videos allegedly used artificial intelligence to recreate Shervani's face, voice, and dialogues, falsely portraying him as a factory owner who sought gangster Atiq Ahmed's help to suppress a workers' strike and later aided Ahmed's criminal consolidation in Allahabad. The suit states none of these events ever occurred.
Who are the defendants named in the suit?
Meta Platforms Inc. is named as Defendant No. 1. Rahul Mishra, who allegedly operates the 'Jan Chaupal Post' social media accounts, is Defendant No. 2. Ranjeet Singh, who allegedly republished the videos, is Defendant No. 3, with unknown entities listed as John Doe defendants.
What relief has Shervani sought from the court?
Shervani has sought removal of the videos, disclosure of the Basic Subscriber Information of the accounts involved, an unconditional public apology, and damages of ₹2.01 crore against the alleged creators and republishers.
Why did Shervani approach the court if legal notices had already been sent?
The plaint alleged that Meta failed to remove the videos despite being served legal notices, leaving the court as the only recourse. The Delhi High Court's interim order now compels action within a 36-hour window that the platform's own content moderation process did not deliver.
Nation Press
The Trail

Connected Dots

Tracing the thread behind this story — newest first.

8 Dots
  1. Latest 1 month ago
  2. 1 month ago
  3. 2 months ago
  4. 2 months ago
  5. 2 months ago
  6. 2 months ago
  7. 6 months ago
  8. 9 months ago
Google Prefer NP
On Google