Delhi riots verdict: BJP demands apology from Kejriwal, slams Congress over appeasement

Share:
Audio Loading voice…
Delhi riots verdict: BJP demands apology from Kejriwal, slams Congress over appeasement

Synopsis

A Delhi trial court's conviction of former AAP councillor Tahir Hussain for the murder of IB officer Ankit Sharma — who suffered 51 stab wounds — has reignited the political battle over the 2020 Delhi riots. The BJP is now demanding a public apology from Kejriwal and pressing Congress on its conduct during the violence, escalating accountability demands at a moment of high electoral stakes.

Key Takeaways

A Delhi trial court convicted former AAP councillor Tahir Hussain for the murder of IB officer Ankit Sharma during the 2020 Delhi riots .
According to the post-mortem report, Ankit Sharma's body had 51 stab wounds ; a total of five individuals have been convicted in the case.
BJP National Spokesperson Gaurav Bhatia demanded a public apology from Arvind Kejriwal , alleging he provided political patronage to Hussain.
AAP leader Amanatullah Khan reportedly called the sentence 'unfortunate' and alleged Hussain was punished on religious grounds — a claim the BJP strongly rejected.
The BJP also questioned Rahul Gandhi's 2020 mosque visit in the riot-hit area, alleging he did not meet the family of the slain officer.

The Bharatiya Janata Party (BJP) on Tuesday, 14 July welcomed a Delhi trial court's verdict convicting former Aam Aadmi Party (AAP) councillor Tahir Hussain in the murder of Intelligence Bureau (IB) officer Ankit Sharma during the 2020 Delhi riots, demanding a public apology from Arvind Kejriwal and accusing the Indian National Congress (Congress) of fuelling communal tensions through appeasement politics.

Key Developments in the Verdict

BJP National Spokesperson Gaurav Bhatia stated that five individuals have been convicted in connection with the crime. According to the post-mortem report cited by Bhatia, Ankit Sharma's body bore 51 stab wounds — Sharma was killed while discharging his official duties as an IB officer. The verdict, Bhatia said, has finally delivered justice to the slain officer and his family.

Bhatia described Tahir Hussain as someone who, at the time, was regarded as a close associate of Kejriwal within the AAP. He alleged that Hussain made inflammatory statements and carried out the attack when Sharma came before the mob while performing his official duty.

BJP's Charges Against Kejriwal and AAP

The BJP spokesperson alleged that Kejriwal had provided political patronage to Tahir Hussain and demanded that Kejriwal appear before the people of Delhi and the country to apologise. Bhatia questioned why Kejriwal had allegedly attempted to shield his party colleague and asked whether the public perception — that Hussain acted at Kejriwal's behest — would ever be addressed.

Bhatia also criticised AAP leader Amanatullah Khan, who reportedly called the court's sentence 'unfortunate' and claimed that Hussain had been punished on account of his religion. The BJP characterised such remarks as an attempt to spread hatred and undermine a verdict based on evidence, material proof, and witness testimonies.

What the BJP Said About Congress and Rahul Gandhi

Bhatia alleged that Congress leader Sonia Gandhi had made an inflammatory statement during the period when the riots were being planned, quoting her as having said: 'Yeh Ladai Aar-Paar Ki Ladai Hai. Ghar Se Niklo, Aar-Paar Ki Ladai Lado.' He alleged that the Congress leadership created an inflammatory atmosphere while pursuing vote-bank politics.

The BJP spokesperson also questioned Congress leader Rahul Gandhi's decision to visit a mosque in the riot-hit area in 2020 without meeting the family of Ankit Sharma. Bhatia said Gandhi neither met the relatives of the deceased nor offered condolences. Rahul Gandhi had reportedly described the mosque visit as an effort to 'provide a healing touch.' Bhatia rejected that framing, calling it instead a 'bleeding touch' and characterising the visit as a manifestation of appeasement politics.

The Broader Political Context

The 2020 Delhi riots — which erupted in the backdrop of protests over the Citizenship Amendment Act — left over 50 people dead and hundreds injured, making them among the worst communal violence incidents in the capital in decades. The conviction of Tahir Hussain, a former AAP councillor who had already been expelled from the party, marks a significant judicial milestone in one of the riot's most high-profile cases.

Notably, this verdict arrives at a politically charged moment, with the BJP using it to draw accountability lines around both AAP and Congress ahead of upcoming electoral cycles. The opposition parties have not yet issued a formal response to the BJP's demands as of the time of reporting.

What Happens Next

With the trial court's verdict now in, the case may move toward the sentencing phase and potential appeals. The BJP has signalled it will continue pressing for political accountability from both AAP and Congress. Whether either party responds formally to the BJP's demands for an apology remains to be seen.

Point of View

Forcing AAP and Congress onto the defensive over conduct during the 2020 riots. What is notable is the silence from both parties in the immediate aftermath; neither has issued a substantive rebuttal to the specific allegations around political patronage or the post-mortem findings. The conviction does not legally implicate Kejriwal or the Congress leadership, but the court of public opinion operates on a different evidentiary standard. With Delhi's electoral landscape still contested, this verdict hands the BJP a potent narrative weapon — and the opposition's response, or lack thereof, will determine how much political damage it ultimately sustains.
NationPress
14 Jul 2026

Frequently Asked Questions

Who is Tahir Hussain and what was he convicted for?
Tahir Hussain is a former AAP councillor convicted by a Delhi trial court for the murder of Intelligence Bureau officer Ankit Sharma during the 2020 Delhi riots. Sharma's post-mortem report reportedly recorded 51 stab wounds; five individuals in total have been convicted in connection with the crime.
Why is the BJP demanding an apology from Arvind Kejriwal?
The BJP alleges that Kejriwal provided political patronage to Tahir Hussain and attempted to shield him after the riots. BJP spokesperson Gaurav Bhatia described Hussain as a close associate of Kejriwal within the AAP at the time, and demanded Kejriwal publicly account for that relationship.
What did AAP leader Amanatullah Khan say about the verdict?
According to BJP spokesperson Gaurav Bhatia, Amanatullah Khan called the court's sentence 'unfortunate' and claimed Hussain was punished on account of his religion. The BJP characterised these remarks as an attempt to spread hatred and undermine a verdict based on evidence and witness testimonies.
Why did the BJP criticise Rahul Gandhi over the 2020 riots?
The BJP alleged that Rahul Gandhi visited a mosque in the riot-hit area in 2020 but did not meet the family of slain IB officer Ankit Sharma or offer condolences. Gandhi had reportedly described the visit as a 'healing touch'; BJP spokesperson Bhatia rejected that framing, calling it instead a 'bleeding touch' driven by appeasement politics.
What were the 2020 Delhi riots?
The 2020 Delhi riots erupted in February 2020 against the backdrop of protests over the Citizenship Amendment Act, leaving over 50 people dead and hundreds injured. They are considered among the worst episodes of communal violence in the capital in recent decades, and multiple criminal cases arising from them are still working through the courts.
Nation Press
The Trail

Connected Dots

Tracing the thread behind this story — newest first.

8 Dots
  1. Latest 2 hours ago
  2. 3 hours ago
  3. 3 hours ago
  4. 21 hours ago
  5. 23 hours ago
  6. 23 hours ago
  7. 1 week ago
  8. 1 month ago
Google Prefer NP
On Google