What Are the Details of the Cooperative Bank Fraud Involving Rs 3.62 Crore?

Synopsis
Key Takeaways
- Rs 3.62 crore worth of properties attached.
- Involvement of N. Srinivasa Murthy and his family.
- Allegations include fraud against bank customers.
- Investigation triggered by multiple FIRs.
- Continuing investigation under PMLA.
Bengaluru, Sep 11 (NationPress) The Enforcement Directorate (ED) in Bengaluru has provisionally attached two immovable properties valued at approximately Rs 3.62 crore. These properties belong to N. Srinivasa Murthy, the former Chairman of Shushruti Souharda Sahakara Bank Niyamitha, and Rathnamma, a close relative of Murthy, as part of an investigation under the Prevention of Money Laundering Act (PMLA), 2002. This action is linked to allegations of fraud against account holders of the bank, as stated by officials on Thursday.
The ED's investigation was triggered by numerous FIRs filed by the Karnataka Police, which claimed that the bank failed to pay interest or return the principal amounts to its customers who had fixed deposits or savings accounts. The statement mentioned that Murthy and the bank's directors allegedly colluded with employees to misappropriate customer deposits, thereby defrauding them.
As the investigation progressed under the PMLA, it became evident that Murthy, along with his wife Dharini Devi and their daughter Mokshatara, who served as Chairman, Director, and Functional Director of the bank respectively, played significant roles in misdirecting funds.
Furthermore, the investigation uncovered that Murthy established various financial entities such as Shruti Souharda Credit Co-operative Society and Shree Lakshmi Mahila Co-Op Society, both of which were managed by Rathnamma. These entities allegedly collected deposits from unsuspecting depositors, only to betray their trust. Additionally, it was discovered that loans were sanctioned in the names of acquaintances without adhering to proper protocols, often lacking collateral. Properties were registered in their names using loan amounts, which subsequently turned into non-performing assets (NPA).
Ongoing investigations are expected to reveal more details.