Karnataka HC quashes BJP defamation complaint over '40% commission' ads; Shivakumar, Siddaramaiah get relief

Share:
Audio Loading voice…
Karnataka HC quashes BJP defamation complaint over '40% commission' ads; Shivakumar, Siddaramaiah get relief

Synopsis

The Karnataka High Court has quashed the BJP's private defamation complaint over Congress's '40 per cent commission rate card' ads — the same campaign that helped the Congress unseat the BJP in 2023. The ruling, by Justice M. Nagaprasanna, clears CM Shivakumar and former CM Siddaramaiah, ending a case that had also previously ensnared Rahul Gandhi.

Key Takeaways

The Karnataka High Court quashed the BJP 's private criminal defamation complaint on 4 November 2026 .
Nagaprasanna passed the order on a petition challenging the defamation proceedings.
The complaint stemmed from KPCC 's '40 per cent commission rate card' advertisements published before the 2023 Assembly elections .
Shivakumar and former CM Siddaramaiah receive relief; Rahul Gandhi had already secured a stay in January 2026 .
The full text of the court's order is awaited; the BJP has not yet announced any challenge to the ruling.

The Karnataka High Court on Wednesday, 4 November 2026, quashed a private criminal defamation complaint filed by the Bharatiya Janata Party (BJP)'s Karnataka unit over the Congress party's '40 per cent commission rate card' advertisements, granting relief to Chief Minister D.K. Shivakumar and former Chief Minister Siddaramaiah. The advertisements, published ahead of the 2023 Karnataka Assembly elections, had accused the then-ruling BJP of fixing commission rates for government appointments and transfers.

Background: The '40 Per Cent Commission' Campaign

The advertisements at the centre of the dispute were released by the Karnataka Pradesh Congress Committee (KPCC) in local newspapers before the 2023 Assembly elections. They alleged that the BJP government was collecting specific amounts as commissions for appointments, transfers, and various government-related activities — effectively publishing what they termed a 'corruption rate card'.

The BJP's state unit filed a private defamation complaint, contending that the advertisements were false, based on 'imaginary assumptions', and had damaged the party's reputation. The trial court took cognisance of the complaint in 2023, naming Congress leaders including Shivakumar, Siddaramaiah, and Leader of Opposition in Lok Sabha Rahul Gandhi as accused.

How the High Court Proceedings Unfolded

Justice M. Nagaprasanna passed the order quashing the private complaint on a petition challenging the defamation proceedings. This follows a series of interim reliefs granted by the court in earlier stages of the case.

On 4 July, the High Court had stayed proceedings against Shivakumar, who was serving as Deputy Chief Minister at that time. The court had also extended similar relief to the KPCC. In January this year, proceedings against Rahul Gandhi in connection with the same case had also been stayed by the High Court.

Significance of Wednesday's Order

Wednesday's ruling goes a step further than those interim stays — it quashes the private complaint entirely, effectively terminating the criminal defamation case filed by the BJP unit. The detailed reasoning behind the court's decision is awaited pending release of the full order text.

Notably, the case had political salience beyond the courtroom: the '40 per cent commission' narrative became one of the Congress party's most prominent electoral weapons in the run-up to the 2023 Karnataka elections, which the Congress went on to win with a decisive majority, ending the BJP's stint in power in the state.

What Happens Next

With the complaint quashed, Shivakumar and Siddaramaiah stand cleared of the criminal defamation proceedings in this matter. The BJP retains the option of challenging the High Court's order before a higher forum, though no such move has been announced. The full text of Justice Nagaprasanna's order, once available, will shed light on the legal reasoning that could have implications for how political campaign advertisements are treated under defamation law going forward.

Point of View

The legal avenue appears closed unless a higher court intervenes. The deeper question is whether India's defamation law framework adequately distinguishes between political campaign hyperbole and actionable falsehood — a line that courts across jurisdictions have struggled to draw consistently.
NationPress
5 Nov 2026

Frequently Asked Questions

What did the Karnataka High Court rule on 4 November 2026?
The Karnataka High Court quashed a private criminal defamation complaint filed by the BJP's Karnataka unit against Congress leaders over the '40 per cent commission rate card' advertisements. The order by Justice M. Nagaprasanna grants full relief to Chief Minister D.K. Shivakumar and former Chief Minister Siddaramaiah.
What were the '40 per cent commission' advertisements about?
The advertisements were published by the Karnataka Pradesh Congress Committee (KPCC) in local newspapers before the 2023 Karnataka Assembly elections. They alleged that the then-ruling BJP government was charging fixed commission rates for government appointments, transfers, and other official activities — a claim the BJP called false and defamatory.
Who else was named in the BJP's defamation complaint?
Besides Chief Minister D.K. Shivakumar and former Chief Minister Siddaramaiah, the complaint also named Congress leader and Leader of Opposition in Lok Sabha Rahul Gandhi. Gandhi had separately secured a stay on proceedings from the High Court in January 2026.
Can the BJP challenge this High Court order?
The BJP retains the legal option of challenging Justice Nagaprasanna's order before the Supreme Court of India, though as of the time of this report no such challenge has been announced. The full reasoning of the order is yet to be made public.
What is the political significance of this case?
The '40 per cent commission' campaign was one of the Congress party's central electoral weapons in the 2023 Karnataka Assembly elections, which the Congress won decisively. The defamation complaint was seen as the BJP's legal pushback against that narrative; its quashing removes a significant legal overhang for the current Karnataka Congress government.
Nation Press
The Trail

Connected Dots

Tracing the thread behind this story — newest first.

8 Dots
  1. Latest 3 weeks ago
  2. 2 months ago
  3. 4 months ago
  4. 8 months ago
  5. 9 months ago
  6. 1 year ago
  7. 1 year ago
  8. 1 year ago
Google Prefer NP
On Google