Arvind Kejriwal Faces Delhi Assembly’s Privileges Committee Over ‘Faansi Ghar’ Controversy
Synopsis
Arvind Kejriwal, the AAP National Convenor, confronts the Delhi Assembly’s Committee of Privileges regarding the controversial ‘Faansi Ghar’. The meeting raises questions about transparency and the Assembly's procedural rules.
Key Takeaways
Arvind Kejriwal appeared before the Delhi Assembly’s Committee of Privileges regarding the ‘Faansi Ghar’ issue.
The Privileges Committee is investigating the legitimacy of the ‘Faansi Ghar’ inaugurated in August 2022 .
Live streaming of the proceedings was denied due to confidentiality rules.
Saurabh Bharadwaj criticized the actions of the committee, calling it a significant democratic concern.
The outcome of this meeting could have lasting implications for governance transparency.
New Delhi, March 6 (NationPress) The former Chief Minister and AAP National Convenor, Arvind Kejriwal, appeared before the Delhi Assembly’s Committee of Privileges on Friday regarding the ‘Faansi Ghar’ incident. During this committee meeting, led by Pradyumn Singh Rajput, Kejriwal provided his rationale for labeling a shaft in the Assembly as a ‘Faansi Ghar’ and for allowing it to be accessible to the public.
The Privileges Committee is made up of MLAs including Surya Prakash Khatri, Abhay Kumar Verma, Ajay Kumar Mahawar, Satish Upadhyay, Neeraj Basoya, Ravi Kant, Ram Singh Netaji, and Surender Kumar.
This issue was initially brought to light by Delhi Assembly Speaker Vijender Gupta and revolves around the legitimacy of the ‘Faansi Ghar’ that was inaugurated on August 9, 2022, within the Delhi Legislative Assembly grounds.
The Committee of Privileges has been assigned to thoroughly investigate this matter to ensure a comprehensive and procedural evaluation of the circumstances that led to the inauguration.
Earlier in the day, Saurabh Bharadwaj, the Delhi AAP Convener, criticized the committee's actions, labeling it a dark day in the city’s democratic history.
“It’s unprecedented for an Assembly panel to summon a former Speaker and Chief Minister. The former CM requested live streaming of the proceedings to ensure media presence, but they seem hesitant,” he commented.
On Thursday, the Assembly secretariat declined Kejriwal’s request for live streaming of the committee's proceedings.
The Deputy Secretary of the Legislature communicated to Kejriwal, stating, “I am directed by the Chairperson to inform you that the Committee of Privileges' proceedings are confidential, and the Rules of Procedure do not allow for live streaming. Furthermore, there is no precedent for the Committee of Privileges sessions being broadcast in Parliament or in other states.”
“The Chairperson expressed surprise at your lack of awareness regarding this, given your tenure of over ten years as a member of this House, during which multiple sessions of the Committee of Privileges took place without any being telecast or live streamed,” the Deputy Secretary added.
Point of View
Where former leaders are called to account for their actions. It raises important questions about transparency and accountability in governance. The proceedings of the Committee of Privileges could set a significant precedent for future interactions between political figures and legislative oversight.
NationPress
9 May 2026
Frequently Asked Questions
What is the ‘Faansi Ghar’ controversy?
The ‘Faansi Ghar’ controversy involves the declaration of a shaft in the Delhi Assembly as a public display, which has raised questions about its legitimacy and the circumstances surrounding its inauguration.
Who is leading the Committee of Privileges?
The Committee of Privileges is headed by Pradyumn Singh Rajput.
Why did Kejriwal request live streaming of the proceedings?
Kejriwal requested live streaming to ensure media coverage of the proceedings, emphasizing transparency in the process.
What was the Assembly secretariat's response to the live streaming request?
The Assembly secretariat rejected the request, citing confidentiality rules and the lack of precedent for live streaming these committee sessions.
How did Saurabh Bharadwaj react to the proceedings?
Saurabh Bharadwaj labeled the proceedings a dark day in the city’s democratic history, expressing concern over the committee's actions.
