Anti-paper leak Bill 2026: Lok Sabha debate to resume Wednesday with Rahul Gandhi set to speak
Synopsis
Key Takeaways
The Lok Sabha witnessed a sharp political confrontation on Tuesday, 28 July 2026 over the Public Examinations (Prevention of Unfair Means) Amendment Bill, 2026, with the government defending its tougher anti-fraud provisions and the Opposition branding the legislation an 'admission of failure' of the existing examination system. The debate remained inconclusive and is set to resume on Wednesday, when Congress leader Rahul Gandhi is expected to address the House at around 12.30 pm.
What the Bill Proposes
The Bill was introduced by Union Minister of State for Personnel Jitendra Singh on Monday. It seeks to amend the Public Examinations (Prevention of Unfair Means) Act, 2024, proposing significantly stricter penalties for examination fraud — including imprisonment of up to 10 years, fines of up to ₹10 crore, confiscation of offenders' assets, and fast-track courts mandated to deliver verdicts within three months.
The legislation follows nationwide protests triggered by the NEET-UG paper leak controversy, which culminated in the resignation of Union Education Minister Dharmendra Pradhan. Lok Sabha Speaker Om Birla allocated six hours for the debate at the outset, with the option of extension. Parliamentary Affairs Minister Kiren Rijiju told the House that while the Opposition had sought eight hours, the government was willing to go up to 10 hours.
NDA Allies Back Bill, Seek Broader Reforms
Telugu Desam Party (TDP) MP Lavu Sri Krishna Devarayalu backed the Bill but urged the government to conduct NEET-UG multiple times a year, arguing that students should not lose an academic year due to personal emergencies. He also called for a national question bank and stricter regulation of coaching centres, contending that education must not become a profit-driven sector.
Shiv Sena MP Shrikant Shinde echoed the demand for multiple examination attempts, saying it would ease student stress, and similarly called for regulation of coaching institutes that allegedly charge exorbitant fees.
Opposition: Law Misses the Root Cause
Congress MP Deepender Singh Hooda praised student protesters as 'protectors of democracy' for their peaceful demonstrations. Congress MP K.C. Venugopal described the paper leak crisis as a 'crisis of hope', alleging the government had failed the country's youth. He demanded that Union Home Minister Amit Shah order a Special Investigation Team (SIT) probe into alleged police action against students during the Parliament March protests.
Samajwadi Party (SP) MP Dimple Yadav accused the police of using excessive force against peaceful protesters, saying the youth had been 'stripped of their dignity'. Nationalist Congress Party (Sharadchandra Pawar) MP Supriya Sule backed the SIT demand and urged the government to convene an all-party meeting to build a comprehensive, leak-proof examination framework.
Congress leader Priyanka Gandhi Vadra took a swipe at Prime Minister Narendra Modi over his social media outreach, saying the government needed to connect with young people through actions rather than presentation.
BJP's Counter: Hold State Governments Accountable Too
Bharatiya Janata Party (BJP) MP Tejasvi Surya argued that the examination crisis reflected systemic problems being addressed through the National Education Policy (NEP), 2020. He maintained that state governments must also be held accountable for irregularities in examinations conducted under their jurisdiction — not just the Centre.
BJP MP Anurag Thakur targeted Rahul Gandhi and Samajwadi Party chief Akhilesh Yadav, accusing them of criticising the Centre while overlooking shortcomings in states their parties govern. He alleged that Uttar Pradesh had witnessed repeated paper leak incidents under previous Samajwadi Party governments.
What Happens Next
The debate is scheduled to continue on Wednesday, with Rahul Gandhi's address anticipated as a key moment. The outcome of the vote on the Bill, and whether the government agrees to an SIT probe into alleged student protest crackdowns, will be closely watched. The passage of the Bill would mark a significant legislative response to one of the most contentious examination controversies in recent years.