Mahua Moitra fires back at BJP over Kharge's Modi remark
Synopsis
Key Takeaways
When Congress president Mallikarjun Kharge declared on Monday, 26 October 2026 that even 'Modi's baap' would have to go — and that Gautam Adani would follow — the Indian political arena crackled. TMC MP Mahua Moitra wasted no time, posting on X to defend the remark by invoking the oldest principle in political combat: what is fair for one side must be fair for the other.
The 'Nani' jab that started it all
Moitra's post references a prior remark attributed to a BJP-aligned figure identified only as 'Poonam', who reportedly taunted that Rahul Gandhi's grandmother — Nani — could not stop the Citizenship Amendment Act (CAA). The dig was a pointed reference to Indira Gandhi, whose legacy Congress frequently invokes and the BJP frequently targets. Moitra notes that BJP and what she terms 'Godi Media' celebrated that remark without objection.
The CAA, passed by Parliament in December 2019 and operationalised through rules notified in 2024, fast-tracks citizenship for non-Muslim migrants from Afghanistan, Bangladesh, and Pakistan. It has remained one of the sharpest fault lines between the ruling dispensation and the opposition — with Congress, TMC, and several other parties arguing the law is constitutionally discriminatory on religious grounds.
Kharge's 'baap bhi jayega' and the Adani thread
The second half of Moitra's post is equally pointed. She quotes Congress president Kharge — who has built a reputation for blunt parliamentary interventions since taking the party's top post in 2022 — saying 'Modi's baap bhi jayega' ('Even Modi's father will go'). Moitra then adds a parenthetical: 'and yes, Adani will go.'
Gautam Adani, chairman of the Adani Group, has been a recurring target of opposition allegations about alleged proximity to the Narendra Modi government. The opposition has repeatedly demanded parliamentary and judicial scrutiny of the conglomerate's affairs — a demand the BJP has consistently rejected as politically motivated.
Reciprocal rhetoric and what the exchange reveals
Moitra's core argument is structural, not just rhetorical. Her 'sauce for the goose is sauce for the gander' framing charges that BJP and its media allies applied one standard when attacking Congress's dynastic heritage and a different standard when Congress turns similarly sharp language against Prime Minister Modi or his perceived business allies.
It is a pattern the Indian opposition has leaned into with increasing frequency — mirroring the ruling party's own combative style to strip it of its shock value. Whether that approach reshapes public opinion or merely deepens the partisan divide is the real question heading into the next round of parliamentary exchanges.