Karnataka Dy CM Parameshwara demands removal of CEC Gyanesh Kumar, independent ECI probe

Share:
Audio Loading voice…
Karnataka Dy CM Parameshwara demands removal of CEC Gyanesh Kumar, independent ECI probe

Synopsis

Karnataka’s Deputy Chief Minister G. Parameshwara has demanded the removal of Chief Election Commissioner Gyanesh Kumar, citing reports that two Election Commissioners filed at least 14 formal objections over 10 months to decisions taken without their knowledge. With 1.08 crore Karnataka voters flagged in draft electoral rolls and the SIR exercise under scrutiny, the opposition’s assault on the ECI’s leadership is sharpening into a constitutional challenge.

Key Takeaways

Karnataka Deputy Chief Minister G.
Parameshwara demanded the removal of CEC Gyanesh Kumar and an independent investigation into ECI functioning on 24 September 2026 .
Media reports indicate Election Commissioners Sukhbir Singh Sandhu and Vivek Joshi filed at least 14 formal objections over 10 months to decisions issued without their knowledge or approval.
Objections reportedly included changes to Form 6 (voter registration), described in one objection as ‘unauthorised and illegal,’ and centralisation of the electoral-roll database.
In Karnataka’s SIR exercise, approximately 1.08 crore voters were flagged under ASDDO categories, including 46.88 lakh in Bengaluru ; around 43.8 lakh faced notices over logical discrepancies.
The Election Commission denied any internal rift, stating all decisions including on SIR had the approval of all three Commissioners.
The demand aligns with broader Congress concerns raised by Rahul Gandhi over electoral roll integrity and voter turnout data.

Karnataka Deputy Chief Minister G. Parameshwara on Thursday, 24 September 2026, demanded the removal of Chief Election Commissioner Gyanesh Kumar and called for an independent investigation into the functioning of the Election Commission of India (ECI), citing reports of internal dissent within the three-member constitutional body. The demand, made from Bengaluru, marks one of the most direct political attacks on the poll panel's current leadership.

The Internal Objections at the Heart of the Controversy

According to media reports, Election Commissioners Sukhbir Singh Sandhu and Vivek Joshi formally recorded objections on at least 14 occasions over 10 months to decisions and communications they said were issued without their knowledge or approval. The reported objections covered voter registration, deletion and restoration of names, the Special Intensive Revision (SIR) exercise, changes to Form 6 — the statutory form used for new voter registration — and access to the electoral-roll database.

According to the reported internal records, the two Commissioners raised concerns that changes to Form 6 could not be made without amendments to the Registration of Electors Rules, 1960. One objection reportedly described the change as ‘unauthorised and illegal.’ Parameshwara also alleged that control over the electoral-roll database had been centralised, bypassing statutory officials at the state level.

What Parameshwara Said

“Has a three-member constitutional body been reduced to the will of one individual — Chief Election Commissioner Gyanesh Kumar?” Parameshwara asked. He underscored that the Chief Election Commissioner is ‘first among equals, not above the Commission,’ and argued that decisions affecting the electoral process must follow the principle of collective decision-making.

“I strongly condemn the manner in which CEC Gyanesh Kumar has functioned in the face of these serious revelations,” the Deputy Chief Minister said. He demanded Kumar’s removal while the allegations are examined through what he described as an independent and impartial investigation. “India’s elections and the faith of every voter in our democracy demand nothing less,” he added.

Karnataka’s SIR Exercise and Electoral Roll Concerns

Parameshwara drew specific attention to the ongoing SIR exercise in Karnataka, pointing to approximately 1.08 crore voters flagged under the Absent, Shifted, Duplicate, Dead, and Others (ASDDO) categories in the state’s draft electoral rolls, including 46.88 lakh in Bengaluru alone. He also referenced around 43.8 lakh voters who reportedly faced notices over ‘logical discrepancies’ or lack of mapping. These figures, he noted, were reported by the Election Commission itself during the Karnataka SIR exercise.

He said the developments added weight to concerns previously raised by Congress leaders, including Leader of Opposition Rahul Gandhi, over electoral rolls, voter turnout data, and alleged irregularities across different states. This is not the first time the SIR process has drawn scrutiny; similar concerns over large-scale voter deletions have been flagged in other states this year.

ECI Pushback: Commission Denies Internal Rift

Election Commission officials have rejected reports of any internal rift, asserting that all decisions taken by the Commission — including those relating to the SIR — had the approval of all three Election Commissioners. The clarification came directly in response to the reports about the 14 objections by Sandhu and Joshi. The Commission has not, as yet, issued a point-by-point rebuttal of the specific objections cited in the media reports.

What Happens Next

Parameshwara’s statement is expected to intensify pressure from the opposition on the ECI’s leadership ahead of upcoming state assembly elections. With the Congress raising questions about the integrity of electoral rolls at both the national and state levels, the demand for Gyanesh Kumar’s removal is likely to become a recurring political flashpoint. Whether the Centre or the Supreme Court takes cognisance of the alleged procedural lapses will be closely watched in the coming weeks.

Point of View

Without addressing the specific objections on record, does little to settle the controversy. What makes this politically charged is the timing: the SIR exercise in Karnataka and other states has already alarmed civil society groups over large-scale voter deletions. The Congress’s use of Parameshwara, a senior state executive rather than a party spokesperson, to demand Kumar’s removal signals that the opposition is escalating this into an institutional accountability issue — not just electoral grievance — ahead of a crowded election calendar.
NationPress
24 Sept 2026

Frequently Asked Questions

Why is Karnataka Dy CM Parameshwara demanding CEC Gyanesh Kumar’s removal?
Parameshwara is demanding the removal of Chief Election Commissioner Gyanesh Kumar following media reports that two Election Commissioners, Sukhbir Singh Sandhu and Vivek Joshi, filed at least 14 formal objections over 10 months to decisions taken without their knowledge or approval. He argues these reports raise serious questions about whether the three-member constitutional body has been reduced to the authority of one individual.
What were the 14 objections filed by the two Election Commissioners about?
According to media reports, the objections related to voter registration, deletion and restoration of names, the Special Intensive Revision (SIR) exercise, changes to Form 6 (the statutory voter registration form), and access to the electoral-roll database. One objection reportedly described a Form 6 change as ‘unauthorised and illegal’ because it was made without amending the Registration of Electors Rules, 1960.
What has the Election Commission said in response?
Election Commission officials have denied any internal rift, stating that all decisions — including those relating to the SIR exercise — had the approval of all three Election Commissioners. The Commission issued this clarification after the reports of the 14 objections became public, but has not yet provided a point-by-point rebuttal.
What are the electoral roll concerns in Karnataka’s SIR exercise?
During Karnataka’s Special Intensive Revision exercise, approximately 1.08 crore voters were flagged under Absent, Shifted, Duplicate, Dead, and Others (ASDDO) categories in the draft electoral rolls, including 46.88 lakh in Bengaluru alone. Around 43.8 lakh additional voters reportedly received notices over logical discrepancies or lack of mapping.
How does this relate to the Congress’s broader concerns about the ECI?
Parameshwara explicitly linked his demand to concerns previously raised by Congress leader and Leader of Opposition Rahul Gandhi over electoral roll integrity, voter turnout data, and alleged irregularities in various states. The demand for an independent probe represents an escalation of the Congress’s ongoing challenge to the ECI’s current leadership and processes.
Nation Press
The Trail

Connected Dots

Tracing the thread behind this story — newest first.

8 Dots
  1. Latest 50 min ago
  2. 7 hours ago
  3. 23 hours ago
  4. Yesterday
  5. Yesterday
  6. Yesterday
  7. 4 days ago
  8. 1 week ago
Google Prefer NP
On Google