Tejashwi Yadav demands FIR against Bihar CM over Jamui victim photo post
Synopsis
Bihar's Opposition leader Tejashwi Yadav has turned the Jamui assault case into a direct legal and political confrontation with Chief Minister Samrat Choudhary — alleging the CM's own social media post violated the POCSO Act by exposing the minor victim's identity. With 120 social media accounts already booked for the same offence, Yadav is demanding equal application of the law, and the RJD has threatened to drag Bihar Police to court if it refuses to act.
Key Takeaways
Tejashwi Yadav on 25 September demanded Bihar Police register a POCSO case against Chief Minister Samrat Choudhary over a social media post allegedly revealing the Jamui minor victim's identity.
The post, which included a photograph of Choudhary's meeting with the victim's family at his Patna residence, was later deleted — but a screenshot had already circulated online.
Bihar Police had already booked approximately 120 social media accounts for circulating material that could identify the minor.
The RJD has threatened to move court and make Bihar Police a party to proceedings if no action is taken against the CM.
In the original Jamui assault , an SIT has been formed, eight accused arrested, and one accused Nandan Yadav reportedly injured in a police encounter on 22 September .
Yadav also reiterated RJD's demand for the arrest of Chief Election Commissioner Gyanesh Kumar , signalling continued multi-front political pressure.
Bihar's Leader of Opposition Tejashwi Yadav on Friday, 25 September 2026, sharply escalated his attack on Chief Minister Samrat Choudhary over the Jamui sexual assault case, alleging that a post from Choudhary's social media account inadvertently exposed the identity of the minor victim — a potential violation of the Protection of Children from Sexual Offences (POCSO) Act. Yadav has demanded that the Bihar Police register a case against the Chief Minister and warned that his party, the Rashtriya Janata Dal (RJD), will move court if police fail to act.
What Triggered the Controversy
According to reports, Chief Minister Samrat Choudhary had met the Jamui victim and her family at his official residence in Patna on Thursday and posted a photograph of the meeting along with a message assuring the family of speedy justice. The post was subsequently deleted, but a screenshot had already circulated online. Yadav alleged that the photograph in the post revealed the minor's identity, constituting a breach of POCSO safeguards.
Notably, the Bihar Police had already registered cases against approximately 120 social media accounts for circulating material — including a video of the original assault — that could identify the minor victim. Yadav argued that the same legal standards must apply uniformly, including to the Chief Minister's account.
RJD's Legal Threat and Political Salvo
The RJD has made clear that if the Bihar Police decline to take action against Choudhary, the party will approach a competent court and potentially make the police a party to the proceedings. Yadav's demand places the police in a politically sensitive position — having already enforced POCSO provisions against ordinary social media users, the force now faces scrutiny over whether it will apply the same standard to the state's top executive.
Yadav also fired a sharp remark at Union Minister and Lok Janshakti Party (Ram Vilas) chief Chirag Paswan, who had separately condemned the Jamui incident. 'Forget about Chirag Paswan; he is the one reaping the benefits of that very system,' Yadav said. Paswan had called for strict action against those responsible for the assault.
Background: The Jamui Assault Case
The original incident reportedly occurred on 19 September, when a minor boy and girl travelling on a two-wheeler were intercepted by a group of youths near the Jamui-Lakhisarai road. A video of the assault subsequently surfaced on social media, triggering widespread outrage and police action.
A case was registered under relevant sections, including the POCSO Act, and a Special Investigation Team (SIT) was formed. Eight accused have since been arrested. One accused, identified by police as Nandan Yadav, was reportedly injured in a police encounter on 22 September; another accused, Hareram Yadav, was also reported injured.
Election Commission Remarks
Separately, Tejashwi Yadav reiterated the RJD's demand for the arrest of Chief Election Commissioner Gyanesh Kumar, saying the party's agitation would continue until its demands were addressed. He called on the CEC to publicly respond to questions being raised over the functioning of the Election Commission of India. The remarks came amid an ongoing broader political dispute over the poll panel's conduct.
Whether the deleted social media post constitutes an offence under the POCSO Act will ultimately depend on a determination by competent authorities or a court. The investigation into the original assault and the circulation of related material remains ongoing.
Point of View
Yet the most prominent post allegedly doing the same came from the Chief Minister's own handle. Yadav is not merely scoring political points — he is surfacing a genuine legal question about equal application of POCSO, a statute that does not recognise rank or office. If the police decline to act, it risks cementing a perception of selective enforcement that will follow this case well beyond its investigation. The RJD's court threat, meanwhile, is tactically sound — a judicial inquiry would force the question that political pressure alone cannot settle.
NationPress
25 Sept 2026
Frequently Asked Questions
What did Tejashwi Yadav allege against Bihar CM Samrat Choudhary?
Tejashwi Yadav alleged that a social media post from Chief Minister Samrat Choudhary's account exposed the identity of the minor victim in the Jamui sexual assault case, potentially violating the POCSO Act. He demanded that Bihar Police register a case against the CM, applying the same legal standard already used against 120 other social media accounts.
What is the Jamui sexual assault case?
The Jamui case refers to an incident on 19 September 2026, when a minor boy and girl on a two-wheeler were reportedly intercepted and assaulted by a group of youths near the Jamui-Lakhisarai road in Bihar. A video of the incident surfaced on social media, leading to police registration of a case under the POCSO Act, formation of an SIT, and arrest of eight accused.
What action has Bihar Police already taken in the Jamui case?
Bihar Police formed a Special Investigation Team (SIT) and arrested eight accused persons. The police also registered cases against approximately 120 social media accounts for circulating material that could reveal the minor victim's identity. One accused, Nandan Yadav, was reportedly injured in a police encounter on 22 September.
What is the RJD threatening if Bihar Police does not act on Yadav's demand?
The RJD has indicated it will approach a competent court seeking legal intervention if Bihar Police fails to act against Chief Minister Samrat Choudhary. The party has said it may also make the Bihar Police a party to the court proceedings.
Does deleting a social media post remove legal liability under POCSO?
Not necessarily. Whether the deleted post constitutes an offence under the POCSO Act will depend on the facts and a determination by competent authorities or a court. A screenshot of the post had already circulated online before deletion, which may be a relevant factor in any legal assessment.
