Is US Action in Venezuela a Threat to Global Stability?
Synopsis
In a recent statement, Salman Khurshid of the Indian National Congress voiced strong opposition to U.S. actions in Venezuela, deeming them a breach of international law. This article delves into the ramifications of these actions for global stability and the Congress's call for respect for Venezuelan sovereignty.
Key Takeaways
The Indian National Congress disapproves of US actions in Venezuela.
Such actions are seen as violating international law .
Khurshid emphasizes the importance of national sovereignty .
The Congress calls for prioritizing the will of the Venezuelan people.
Protests reflect a broader dissent against perceived imperialism.
New Delhi, Jan 5 (NationPress) Indian National Congress leader Salman Khurshid reiterated the party's strong objection to the actions taken by the United States in Venezuela, labeling them as a breach of international law and the UN Charter, posing a significant danger to global stability.
Khurshid, who previously served as External Affairs Minister and is currently the Chairman of the Foreign Affairs Department of the Congress, expressed that, “The Congress expresses serious concern regarding the unilateral measures adopted by the United States in Venezuela over the last 48 hours, which violate the established principles of international law as outlined in the United Nations Charter and various international agreements.”
The Congress party has been vocal since the alleged “capture” of President Nicolas Maduro of Venezuela and his spouse, asserting that the U.S. actions threaten global stability.
Khurshid emphasized, “The principles of national sovereignty and peaceful coexistence are fundamental to the post-World War II global order. Any military action that breaches these principles without explicit approval from the United Nations risks reviving outdated statecraft rules and jeopardizes international stability.”
Furthermore, the Indian National Congress advocates for prioritizing the will of the Venezuelan populace and ensuring that the nation's resources are utilized for their benefit, as guaranteed by the principles of Permanent Sovereignty over Natural Resources.
Earlier, a colleague of Khurshid, Jairam Ramesh, who serves as the General Secretary for Communications of the party, voiced similar concerns regarding the recent events in the South American country.
In a statement on X on Sunday, Ramesh mentioned, “The INC expresses deep concern about the U.S. actions regarding Venezuela in the past 24 hours. The established principles of international law cannot be unilaterally disregarded.”
The Congress's response to these international developments coincided with protests organized by Left parties at Jantar Mantar in New Delhi on Sunday.
The leadership of the CPI(M) condemned the United States for what they termed as “imperialist military aggression” against Venezuela, calling for a global outcry and urging the Indian government to adopt a clear and assertive stance against the actions.
Protesters accused the U.S. of attacking Venezuela to seize control of its oil resources.
Point of View
It's crucial to highlight that while the Congress party's stance reflects a significant concern over U.S. actions, the broader implications for international law and sovereignty must be examined in a balanced manner. The situation in Venezuela is complex, and understanding all perspectives is essential for a comprehensive analysis.
NationPress
11 May 2026
Frequently Asked Questions
What is the stance of the Indian National Congress on US actions in Venezuela?
The Indian National Congress, led by Salman Khurshid, opposes the US actions in Venezuela, calling them a violation of international law and a threat to global stability.
Why are the US actions in Venezuela considered a threat?
These actions are seen as a breach of established international laws and principles, which could destabilize the existing global order.
What do the principles of national sovereignty entail?
National sovereignty emphasizes a nation's right to govern itself without external interference, which is a cornerstone of international law.
What was the reaction of Jairam Ramesh regarding the situation?
Jairam Ramesh expressed grave concern over the US actions, reinforcing the Congress's position against unilateral violations of international law.
What protests coincided with the Congress's reaction?
Left parties protested against US actions at Jantar Mantar in New Delhi, condemning what they termed imperialist aggression.
