Will Judicial Scrutiny of Electoral Rolls Begin in Bengal on Monday?
Synopsis
Key Takeaways
Kolkata, Feb 22 (NationPress) The comprehensive judicial examination of claims and objections arising from the ongoing Special Intensive Revision (SIR) of electoral rolls in the election-bound West Bengal is set to commence on Monday. This process will initially involve 150 session judges appointed by the Calcutta High Court.
A total of 250 judicial officers are participating in this initiative, with the judicial adjudication process being supervised at the district level by a three-member committee appointed by the Calcutta High Court in each district.
The process kicks off on Monday, involving 150 session judges, while the remaining judges will contribute as needed.
Each supervisory committee will consist of one district judge, the district magistrate (who also serves as the district electoral officer), and the relevant district police officer.
“The goal is to finalize the verification of cases labeled as ‘logical discrepancy’ cases that have been forwarded for confirmation by the judicial officers by February 28,” disclosed a source from the office of the Chief Electoral Officer (CEO) of West Bengal.
The final voters’ list for West Bengal is slated to be published as scheduled on February 28, excluding the voter documents referred to the judicial officials for adjudication. Supplementary lists will follow accordingly.
An emergency meeting took place at the Jeshop Bhavan in North Kolkata on Sunday at 11:30 a.m., where judges and representatives from the Election Commission gathered to finalize the hearing procedures, document verification, and timely resolution.
As this report was prepared, the meeting was ongoing and expected to continue for some time. The briefing and training of the judicial officers involved in the process will be concluded by Sunday night, paving the way for the comprehensive judicial adjudication of voters’ documents to begin on Monday.
Currently, it is estimated that about 45 to 50 lakh voters’ documents will undergo judicial adjudication, all classified as “logical discrepancy” cases, including those with peculiar family data identified during the “progeny mapping” process.