Why is BJP questioning the omission of reserved categories in JPSC main exam results?

Synopsis
The BJP's serious concerns regarding the JPSC exam results highlight the need for transparency and adherence to constitutional reservation mandates. As questions arise about the fairness of candidate selection, the party demands state intervention to uphold the integrity of the recruitment process.
Key Takeaways
- The BJP has raised concerns over the JPSC results.
- Transparency in the examination process is crucial.
- Constitutional provisions for reservation must be followed.
- Questions about candidate selection from outside Jharkhand have emerged.
- State intervention is urged to maintain JPSC's credibility.
Ranchi, May 24 (NationPress) The Bharatiya Janata Party (BJP) has expressed significant apprehensions regarding the recently announced outcomes of the Jharkhand Public Service Commission (JPSC) Civil Services Main Examination, questioning the lack of category-wise reservation information in the list of candidates who succeeded.
During a press conference held at the state BJP headquarters, party spokesperson Pratul Shahdeo claimed that the results, which were made public almost 11 months after the exam, lack clarity and fail to comply with constitutional mandates on reservation.
“Articles 15 and 16 of the Indian Constitution require reservation for SC, ST, and OBC categories, along with provisions for EWS and other groups. However, the JPSC has issued the results akin to a lottery draw, omitting any category-wise breakdown,” Shahdeo stated.
He further noted that the results do not specify whether the necessary quotas for the reserved categories were maintained or if the standard procedure of calling more than 2.5 times the number of candidates for interviews was followed.
Shahdeo referred to the Jharkhand Combined Civil Services Examination Rules, 2023, which were announced by the Personnel Department on December 19, 2023. These rules explicitly outline category-wise cut-offs and provisions for SC, ST, OBC, EBC (Annexure I), BC (Annexure II), Women, Primitive Tribes, and EWS candidates.
“The JPSC notification also indicates that candidates from each category should be invited for interviews at more than 2.5 times the number of vacancies, with the possibility of relaxing cut-off marks if required. Yet, there is no reference to any category in the published results,” he remarked.
“This brings into question whether candidates from reserved categories received adequate representation,” he added.
Shahdeo also inquired whether an undue number of candidates from outside Jharkhand were selected, as has been suggested in previous recruitment processes.
He urged the state government to step in and ensure transparency, cautioning that the credibility of JPSC could face further scrutiny if corrective actions are not implemented.