Is There a Major Lapse? Chirag Paswan Promises Government Action in Galgotias University’s Robotic Dog Controversy

Share:
Audio Loading voice…
Is There a Major Lapse? Chirag Paswan Promises Government Action in Galgotias University’s Robotic Dog Controversy

Synopsis

Union Minister Chirag Paswan has called the display of a Chinese robotic dog at Galgotias University a 'major lapse.' With international scrutiny on the India AI Impact Summit, he promises government action post-event. The incident raises concerns over misinformation and its impact on India's global standing.

Key Takeaways

Chirag Paswan labels the incident as a major lapse.
The government will assess actions post-summit.
University distanced itself from misinformed representative.
Concerns over misinformation affecting India's global image.
Political figures demand accountability from Galgotias University.

Patna, Feb 19 (NationPress) In the midst of the controversy surrounding Galgotias University and its display of a Chinese robotic dog at the India AI Impact Summit, Union Minister Chirag Paswan labeled the incident a "major lapse" and indicated that the government will determine further actions once the summit concludes.

Speaking to reporters, Paswan emphasized that it is entirely inappropriate for a university to showcase a product and falsely assert ownership of it. "This is a major lapse. A university showcasing incorrect information and claiming ownership is completely unacceptable," he stated.

Addressing the university representative who discussed the robotic dog, Paswan noted that she seemed to be carefully choosing her words to rationalize the situation. "The individual present was attempting to manipulate language. She stated that the message was conveyed differently and subsequently misinterpreted. However, during a national AI Summit, such occurrences are serious matters," he remarked.

Paswan added that the incident raises significant concerns, particularly since the summit serves as a global platform that attracts international attention. He underscored that such events could damage India's reputation worldwide.

"The summit is ongoing. Following its conclusion, the government will assess the necessary course of action. The way this was presented has fostered a negative impression globally," he noted.

Earlier, Shiv Sena-UBT MPs, including Priyanka Chaturvedi and Anil Desai, scrutinized the organizers and called for stringent measures, including penalties, against the university. The MPs expressed that the incident represents not only national embarrassment but also invites international mockery.

In its initial official response to the controversy on Wednesday, the Centre expressed its desire for "authentic and factual work" to be showcased at such events, emphasizing a rejection of misinformation.

The Greater Noida-based university faced substantial backlash on social media after Neha Singh, a Professor of Communications, claimed in an interview with DD News that the robotic dog displayed at the university’s pavilion was developed by its “centre of excellence”. She referred to the robotic dog as “Orion”. However, it later became apparent that the product was the Unitree Go2, created by China's Unitree Robotics.

Neha Singh subsequently attributed the incident to miscommunication. Meanwhile, the university distanced itself from her comments, stating she was not authorized to speak with the media. In a statement, Galgotias University extended its apologies for the confusion and asserted that the representative was "ill-informed".

"We at Galgotias University sincerely apologize for the confusion caused during the recent AI Summit. One of our representatives at the pavilion was misinformed. She lacked knowledge of the product's technical origins and, in her eagerness to be on camera, provided factually incorrect information, despite not being authorized to communicate with the press," the institution declared.

Point of View

I believe this issue underscores the critical need for universities to ensure accuracy in their representations, especially on global platforms. The incident not only highlights a lapse in communication but also poses a risk to India's reputation. It is vital for authorities to take appropriate action to rectify the situation and uphold the integrity of our educational institutions.
NationPress
9 May 2026

Frequently Asked Questions

What was the controversy involving Galgotias University?
The controversy arose when Galgotias University showcased a Chinese robotic dog at the India AI Impact Summit and falsely claimed ownership of the product, which led to significant backlash.
What did Chirag Paswan say about the incident?
Chirag Paswan described the incident as a 'major lapse' and stated that the government would take action after the summit concluded.
What was the response from the university?
Galgotias University apologized for the confusion and clarified that the representative who spoke about the robotic dog was misinformed and not authorized to speak to the media.
How did this incident affect India's image?
The incident raised concerns about misinformation and has the potential to harm India's reputation internationally, especially during a globally-watched summit.
What actions are being called for by political figures?
Political figures, including Shiv Sena-UBT MPs, have called for strict penalties against the university for the incident.
Nation Press
The Trail

Connected Dots

Tracing the thread behind this story — newest first.

8 Dots
  1. Latest 2 months ago
  2. 2 months ago
  3. 2 months ago
  4. 2 months ago
  5. 2 months ago
  6. 2 months ago
  7. 2 months ago
  8. 2 months ago
Google Prefer NP
On Google