Hegseth defends Iran war costs, China trip at Senate hearing

Share:
Audio Loading voice…
Hegseth defends Iran war costs, China trip at Senate hearing

Synopsis

US Defense Secretary Pete Hegseth told senators the Iran war has cost $29 billion, Iran's conventional navy is "at the bottom of the Persian Gulf," and the US still holds leverage — even as the Strait of Hormuz remains closed and lawmakers from both parties questioned whether Washington has a credible plan to end the conflict.

Key Takeaways

Pete Hegseth defended the Iran military campaign before the Senate Appropriations Subcommittee on Defence on 13 May , alongside Joint Chiefs Chairman General Dan Caine .
The Pentagon estimates the Iran conflict has cost approximately $29 billion , with damage to US military facilities still uncalculated.
Hegseth claimed "the entirety of Iran's conventional navy is at the bottom of the Persian Gulf" and said the US has "more leverage than we've ever had." Disruption in the Strait of Hormuz has driven up global oil prices; Hegseth said military options exist but a negotiated settlement is the preferred outcome.
Senator Chris Coons and Senator Patty Murray criticised the administration over the war's economic fallout and lack of a clear exit strategy.
Hegseth reaffirmed US commitments to Taiwan , Japan , and the Philippines ahead of President Trump's upcoming visit to China .

US Secretary of Defense Pete Hegseth on 13 May fiercely defended the Trump administration's ongoing military campaign against Iran before the Senate Appropriations Subcommittee on Defence, clashing repeatedly with Democratic lawmakers over the war's soaring costs and insisting the United States still "holds all the cards" despite continued disruption in the Strait of Hormuz. Appearing alongside Joint Chiefs Chairman General Dan Caine, Hegseth also sought to reassure Indo-Pacific allies ahead of President Donald Trump's upcoming visit to China.

The Iran War: Costs and Controversy

The contentious hearing centred on Trump's proposed $1.5 trillion defence budget and the mounting costs of the Iran conflict. The Pentagon estimated the campaign has already cost approximately $29 billion, though officials acknowledged that damage to US military facilities had not yet been fully calculated.

Senator Chris Coons said Americans were paying the price for a war that lacked "clear objectives and a plan for how it ends," while Senator Patty Murray criticised the administration for seeking massive defence spending even as Americans struggled with rising fuel and food prices linked to the closure of the Strait of Hormuz.

Hegseth pushed back forcefully. "For 47 years, we've been attacked by Iran, and they've been lying to pursue a nuclear weapon and President Trump had the courage to do something about it," he said. He also claimed that "the entirety of Iran's conventional navy is at the bottom of the Persian Gulf," arguing the administration now had "more leverage than we've ever had."

The Strait of Hormuz Standoff

Lawmakers from both parties questioned whether the administration had a viable plan to reopen the Strait of Hormuz, where commercial shipping disruptions have driven up global oil prices. Asked directly how Washington intended to reopen the strait, Hegseth said there were "most certainly" military options available but argued the preferred outcome remained a negotiated settlement under which Iran would stop acting as "pirates of international waters."

General Caine acknowledged that Iran continued to hold "the world's economy hostage" through its military pressure in the strait but declined to discuss classified operational details. This comes amid growing concern among economists and energy analysts that a prolonged closure could further strain global supply chains already under pressure.

NATO, Ukraine and Alliance Tensions

Senate Appropriations Committee Chairman Mitch McConnell questioned why key military priorities — including missile defence, munitions, and drone warfare — had not been fully incorporated into the Pentagon's base budget request. He also warned against weakening ties with allies at a time when "our adversaries are working together to undermine America and the West."

McConnell praised European allies for increasing defence spending and supporting Ukraine, while Coons warned the administration was sending "the wrong signal" by delaying military assistance already approved by Congress. Hegseth defended the administration's approach, arguing Washington needed "real, capable allies and partners" willing to share the burden in future conflicts.

China and Indo-Pacific Commitments

China emerged as a major focal point of the hearing. McConnell asked Hegseth whether security commitments to Taiwan and freedom of navigation in the South China Sea would remain protected during Trump's upcoming talks in Beijing. Hegseth responded that the administration's objective was always to ensure that "American interests are advanced" and said that Indo-Pacific partnerships — including with Japan, Taiwan, and the Philippines — had been strengthened through operational cooperation and burden-sharing.

With Trump's China visit looming and the Strait of Hormuz still disrupted, the administration faces mounting pressure to demonstrate both a credible endgame for the Iran conflict and an unwavering posture in the Indo-Pacific.

Point of View

Yet the Strait of Hormuz — the world's most critical oil chokepoint — remains closed, and the administration has no publicly articulated plan to reopen it. A $29 billion price tag with damage assessments still incomplete is not a sign of a campaign winding down. Meanwhile, the simultaneous reassurance tour for Indo-Pacific allies ahead of a China summit suggests Washington is trying to project strength on two fronts at once — a posture that history suggests is easier to announce than to sustain.
NationPress
2 Jul 2026

Frequently Asked Questions

How much has the US military campaign against Iran cost so far?
The Pentagon estimates the Iran conflict has cost approximately $29 billion, though damage to US military facilities has not yet been fully calculated, according to officials who testified at the Senate hearing on 13 May.
What is happening in the Strait of Hormuz?
Iran's military presence in the Strait of Hormuz has disrupted commercial shipping, driving up global oil prices. General Dan Caine acknowledged Iran was holding "the world's economy hostage" through this pressure, while Hegseth said the US has military options but prefers a negotiated resolution.
What did Pete Hegseth say about Iran's military capabilities?
Hegseth claimed that "the entirety of Iran's conventional navy is at the bottom of the Persian Gulf" and argued the US now has "more leverage than we've ever had" over Tehran. He attributed the military action to Iran's alleged decades-long pursuit of a nuclear weapon.
How did Democratic senators respond to Hegseth at the hearing?
Democratic senators were sharply critical. Senator Chris Coons said the war lacked "clear objectives and a plan for how it ends," while Senator Patty Murray questioned the logic of seeking massive defence spending as Americans faced rising fuel and food costs.
What did Hegseth say about US commitments to Taiwan and the South China Sea?
Hegseth assured lawmakers that the administration's objective was to ensure "American interests are advanced" in the Indo-Pacific, and said partnerships with Japan, Taiwan, and the Philippines had been strengthened through operational cooperation ahead of President Trump's upcoming visit to China.
Nation Press
The Trail

Connected Dots

Tracing the thread behind this story — newest first.

8 Dots
  1. Latest 1 month ago
  2. 1 month ago
  3. 1 month ago
  4. 2 months ago
  5. 2 months ago
  6. 2 months ago
  7. 2 months ago
  8. 3 months ago
Google Prefer NP
On Google