Lavrov: US yet to respond to its own Ukraine peace proposals from Anchorage
Synopsis
Russia accepted America’s own Ukraine peace proposals at the Anchorage summit — then heard nothing back. Lavrov’s public rebuke at the Primakov Readings lays bare a striking diplomatic contradiction: the US pushed for a Ukraine framework, Moscow agreed, and Washington has since responded with silence and new sanctions.
Key Takeaways
Russian FM Sergei Lavrov said on 24 June that the US has not replied to its own Ukraine settlement proposals made at the Anchorage summit.
President Putin had accepted the American proposals; Lavrov described the Anchorage understandings as ‘already a compromise.’ President Trump reportedly travelled to Washington to consult Europeans and Zelenskyy after the summit, but no formal response followed.
The US has since extended existing sanctions on Russia and imposed new ones, further straining the diplomatic channel.
The Russia-US Summit in Anchorage, Alaska took place in August 2025 to discuss the ongoing war in Ukraine.
Russian Foreign Minister Sergei Lavrov on Wednesday, 24 June stated that the United States has not yet replied to its own proposals for a Ukrainian settlement — proposals that were put forward ahead of a Russia-US Summit held in Anchorage, Alaska, and which Moscow had accepted. Lavrov made the remarks at the Primakov Readings international scientific and expert forum, according to reports.
What Lavrov Said at the Forum
According to reports citing Russian news agency Tass, Lavrov said Russia was handed “absolutely concrete proposals” before the Anchorage summit, which President Vladimir Putin had accepted. He expressed frustration that no follow-up response had materialised from Washington.
“We thought we had reached an agreement there. But a week passes, then two. President (of the United States Donald) Trump went to Washington to consult with the Europeans. (Volodymyr) Zelenskyy was also consulted there somehow. But in the end, we still don’t have a response to the American proposal, which we supported,” Lavrov said, as per Tass. “That’s how the situation looks now.”
Russia’s Position on the Anchorage Understandings
Lavrov characterised the understandings reached in Alaska as “already a compromise” on Russia’s part. He stressed that Moscow had not conceded ground but had simply agreed on a framework to end active hostilities and proceed to negotiations on all remaining issues.
“And now they’re telling us, ‘Listen, it’s not working out yet, let’s give in to something else.’ We didn’t give in to anything there. We simply agreed on how to end hostilities and begin resolving all other issues at the negotiating table,” he added, according to Tass.
Notably, Lavrov said it was the US that had pressed for the Ukraine issue to be addressed — and Russia had believed the Anchorage meeting had resolved it. He further noted that Washington had since extended existing sanctions against Russia and imposed new ones, complicating the diplomatic climate.
Background: The Anchorage Summit
President Putin and President Trump met in Anchorage in August 2025 to discuss the ongoing war in Ukraine. The summit had raised expectations of a diplomatic breakthrough, with both sides reportedly discussing pathways toward a durable ceasefire and a broader political settlement.
Moscow’s Stated Goals
In December 2024, Lavrov had said Moscow would continue pursuing its objectives in Ukraine regardless of external timelines or predictions about when the conflict might end. He reiterated that President Putin had publicly and unambiguously outlined Russia’s goals.
“For us, the most important thing is the essence, and the essence concerns the security of the Russian Federation and the safety of the Russian people, whom the Kyiv regime has declared terrorists and deprived of all rights. This is our goal,” Lavrov said at an Embassy roundtable on Ukraine’s settlement, as per Tass.
With no US response forthcoming and fresh sanctions in place, the diplomatic window opened at Anchorage appears, for now, to remain stalled — leaving the path to a sustainable peace in Ukraine deeply uncertain.
Point of View
It shifts accountability in ways mainstream coverage has largely glossed over. Washington’s silence, combined with fresh sanctions, suggests either internal disagreement within the Trump administration or a deliberate recalibration away from the Anchorage framework. Either way, the gap between the summit’s optics and its diplomatic output is widening, and the absence of a credible US response gives Moscow a convenient narrative shield as the war continues.
NationPress
24 Jun 2026
Frequently Asked Questions
What did Lavrov say about the US and Ukraine peace proposals?
Lavrov said on 24 June that the US had not yet responded to its own Ukraine settlement proposals, which Russia accepted ahead of the Anchorage summit. He described the situation as a diplomatic stalemate, with Washington consulting European partners and Zelenskyy but sending no formal reply to Moscow.
What happened at the Anchorage summit between Putin and Trump?
Presidents Putin and Trump met in Anchorage, Alaska in August 2025 to discuss the war in Ukraine. According to Lavrov, the US presented concrete proposals at the summit that Russia accepted, with both sides reportedly reaching understandings on how to move toward ending hostilities.
Why does Lavrov say the Anchorage understandings were a compromise?
Lavrov stated that Russia had not conceded its core objectives but had agreed to a phased framework — first ending active hostilities, then resolving all other issues at the negotiating table. He characterised this flexibility as a compromise on Moscow’s part.
What has the US done since the Anchorage summit?
According to Lavrov, the US has extended previous sanctions against Russia and imposed new ones since the Anchorage summit, despite the diplomatic engagement. He said this contradicts the spirit of the understandings reached there.
What are Russia’s stated goals in Ukraine?
Lavrov has said Russia’s goals centre on the security of the Russian Federation and the protection of Russian-speaking people in Ukraine, whom he accused the Kyiv government of targeting. He stated Moscow will pursue these objectives regardless of external deadlines or predictions about the war’s end.
