Delhi BJP President Virendra Sachdeva Critiques Opposition's Stance on Women's Reservation Bill
Synopsis
In a bold statement, Delhi BJP chief Virendra Sachdeva exposes the Opposition's anti-women stance by condemning their vote against the women’s quota Bill. His remarks highlight a significant political confrontation regarding women's rights in India.
Key Takeaways
Virendra Sachdeva criticizes the Opposition for voting against a women's reservation Bill.
The Bill proposes 33% reservation for women in Parliament.
Amit Shah emphasizes that women will not forgive Congress for their opposition.
The discussion raises questions about political commitments to gender equality.
Criticism of attempts to create a North-South divide in political representation.
New Delhi, April 17 (NationPress) The President of the Delhi BJP, Virendra Sachdeva, criticized the Opposition on Friday, highlighting their anti-women position as evidenced by their vote against the Constitution (131st Amendment) Bill in Parliament. He claimed that several parties, including the Congress, RJD, and Samajwadi Party, opposed the initiative to offer 33 percent reservation for women alongside an expansion of parliamentary seats.
Sachdeva questioned the Congress's failure to increase the number of Parliament seats from 1971 to 2009 during constituency delimitation exercises.
“We have always believed in garnering Opposition support for this noble cause, which they have denied. They now stand exposed before over 70 crore women in India,” he remarked.
During the Lok Sabha discussion on the Bill, Union Home Minister Amit Shah declared, “Women across the nation will not forgive Congress and Rahul Gandhi for obstructing the passage of this reservation for women.”
He also condemned the leaders of the INDIA bloc for raising the Muslim reservation issue, asserting it stemmed from motives of appeasement.
“The Indian Constitution does not endorse reservations based on religion due to two main reasons: firstly, eligibility for reservation should not be obtainable through religious conversion; secondly, reservation is intended for those who are socially and educationally disadvantaged or belong to the Scheduled Castes and Scheduled Tribes,” he explained.
The Home Minister further criticized the Opposition for trying to instigate a divide between the North and South regarding the proposed delimitation.
“The southern states hold equal rights in this House as the northern states. Even the small Lakshadweep has the same rights as Uttar Pradesh, Gujarat, and Bihar. We must not allow the country to be fragmented by a narrative of North versus South,” he remarked.
Frequently Asked Questions
What is the Constitution (131st Amendment) Bill?
The Constitution (131st Amendment) Bill aims to provide a 33% reservation for women in Parliament, promoting gender equality in political representation.
Why did the Opposition vote against the Bill?
The Opposition parties, including the Congress, RJD, and Samajwadi Party, expressed their dissent against the Bill, which led to accusations of an anti-women stance.
What did Amit Shah say about the Congress?
Amit Shah criticized Congress and Rahul Gandhi for obstructing the women’s reservation Bill, suggesting that women would not forgive them for their actions.
What is the significance of the women’s reservation Bill?
The Bill is significant as it aims to enhance female representation in legislative bodies, addressing gender disparity in Indian politics.
How does the Bill affect the delimitation process?
The Bill proposes an increase in parliamentary seats, which is connected to the delimitation process that determines the electoral boundaries and representation.
