Oil majors slash low-carbon spend to $8.3bn, pivot back to hydrocarbons

Share:
Audio Loading voice…
Oil majors slash low-carbon spend to $8.3bn, pivot back to hydrocarbons

Synopsis

For the first time, the world's biggest oil companies have simultaneously cut green spending and raised fossil-fuel investment. A near two-thirds drop in low-carbon outlays — from $24 billion to $8.3 billion in a single year — signals that energy security fears, not climate pledges, are now driving capital allocation at the supermajor level.

Key Takeaways

Combined low-carbon spending by seven global oil supermajors fell to $8.3 billion in 2025 , the lowest since 2019 , down from $24 billion in 2024 .
This is the first time low-carbon outlays have declined while hydrocarbon investments simultaneously increased, according to Equirus Securities .
Equinor withdrew its renewable-capacity target and approved a NOK 40 billion investment to expand Norway's Troll gas field , which supplies nearly 30% of Europe's gas.
BP is targeting production of more than 1 million barrels of oil equivalent per day from its US portfolio by 2030 .
The UAE plans to push crude output beyond 5 million barrels per day , backed by over $200 billion in cumulative investment by 2030 .
The shift reflects a move toward 'energy addition' rather than 'energy substitution', driven by AI, data centres, and emerging-economy demand.

Global oil supermajors slashed their combined low-carbon spending to approximately $8.3 billion in 2025 — the lowest level since 2019 — while simultaneously ramping up investments in conventional oil and gas, according to a report by Equirus Securities. The shift marks the first time low-carbon outlays have fallen while hydrocarbon investments rose, underscoring a structural reassessment of energy strategy driven by geopolitical tensions and energy security concerns.

Scale of the Retreat

The combined low-carbon expenditure of seven global oil supermajors dropped sharply from around $24 billion in 2024 to $8.3 billion in 2025, according to the Equirus Securities report. That represents a decline of nearly two-thirds in a single year. Simultaneously, upstream oil and gas project spending has increased — a reversal that would have been considered unlikely just three years ago, when net-zero pledges dominated corporate energy strategy.

Company-Level Moves

Norwegian multinational energy company Equinor has revised its oil and gas production outlook upward, withdrawn its renewable-capacity target, and approved a NOK 40 billion investment to expand output from Norway's Troll gas field, which supplies nearly 30 per cent of Europe's gas demand. London-based energy company BP has accelerated its pivot toward conventional energy, increasing its focus on upstream growth and targeting production of more than one million barrels of oil equivalent per day from its US portfolio by 2030. The United Arab Emirates (UAE), meanwhile, plans to raise crude oil production beyond 5 million barrels per day and has announced cumulative investment commitments exceeding $200 billion by 2030.

The 'Energy Addition' Thesis

The Equirus Securities report frames the broader shift as a move from 'energy substitution' to 'energy addition' — a distinction with significant policy implications. Rising electricity demand from artificial intelligence, data centres, industrialisation, and emerging economies is driving total energy consumption higher, rather than simply reshaping its composition. As the report noted, 'LNG, nuclear power, power grids and conventional fuels are increasingly being added alongside renewable energy sources to meet rising demand rather than replacing hydrocarbons altogether.' This comes amid a period when renewable deployment continues to expand globally, but evidently not fast enough to offset surging baseline demand.

What This Means for the Energy Transition

The Equirus Securities report concludes that hydrocarbons are likely to remain a significant part of the global energy mix for longer than previously anticipated. Notably, the retreat from low-carbon spending does not signal a halt to renewables — rather, it reflects a recalibration of priorities under energy security pressure from geopolitical conflicts. This is the first measurable instance of the supermajors collectively reversing course on green investment since the post-pandemic net-zero surge of 2021–2024. The implications for global climate targets, particularly the COP commitments tied to fossil-fuel phase-down timelines, are likely to draw scrutiny from policymakers and climate advocates.

Point of View

The implied phase-down timelines embedded in COP agreements become harder to enforce. The real test will come when energy security pressures ease: whether this is a tactical pause or a permanent retreat from the net-zero playbook will define the credibility of the supermajors' climate commitments.
NationPress
20 Jun 2026

Frequently Asked Questions

Why are oil majors cutting low-carbon investments in 2025?
Oil majors are cutting low-carbon investments primarily due to energy security concerns stemming from geopolitical conflicts, which have made conventional oil and gas appear more strategically reliable. According to a report by Equirus Securities, this has triggered the first simultaneous decline in green spending and rise in hydrocarbon investment among the seven largest supermajors.
How much did global oil majors spend on low-carbon initiatives in 2025?
Combined low-carbon spending by seven global oil supermajors fell to approximately $8.3 billion in 2025, down sharply from around $24 billion in 2024 — the lowest level since 2019, according to Equirus Securities.
What is Equinor doing with its energy strategy?
Equinor has revised its oil and gas production outlook upward, withdrawn its renewable-capacity target, and approved a NOK 40 billion investment to expand production from Norway's Troll gas field, which supplies nearly 30 per cent of Europe's gas demand.
What does 'energy addition' mean in this context?
'Energy addition' refers to a shift in the global energy landscape where LNG, nuclear, conventional fuels, and renewables are all being added to the energy mix to meet rising demand, rather than renewables replacing hydrocarbons outright. The Equirus Securities report attributes this to growing electricity demand from AI, data centres, industrialisation, and emerging economies.
Will hydrocarbons remain relevant despite the growth of renewable energy?
According to the Equirus Securities report, hydrocarbons are likely to remain a significant part of the global energy mix for longer than previously anticipated, even as renewable deployment continues to expand. The report cites surging baseline electricity demand as the primary reason fossil fuels are not being phased out on earlier timelines.
Nation Press
The Trail

Connected Dots

Tracing the thread behind this story — newest first.

8 Dots
  1. Latest 4 weeks ago
  2. 1 month ago
  3. 1 month ago
  4. 2 months ago
  5. 5 months ago
  6. 11 months ago
  7. 1 year ago
  8. 1 year ago
Google Prefer NP
On Google