Abhijit Vaghani on royalty vs upfront pay: India vs West music systems
Synopsis
Key Takeaways
Veteran music composer and producer Abhijit Vaghani, with a 27-year career shaping the sound of Bollywood, has come out in support of the Indian music industry's practice of paying artistes upfront for their rights — rather than through residual royalty income. Speaking from his studio in Andheri West, Mumbai, Vaghani offered a nuanced breakdown of why the two systems exist and why both have merit depending on context.
How the Western Revenue-Sharing Model Works
Vaghani explained that in the West, songwriting credits are typically split equally among collaborators in a room. 'We have very different systems in the west and in India. If I'm a songwriter and I'm in a room, if I have three other songwriters with me, then our equal shares are formed. And that happens in a revenue sharing system,' he said.
Under this model, every credited contributor receives a proportional slice of earnings generated by a song — streams, sync placements, broadcasts — over the lifetime of the track. The longer a song stays in circulation, the more it pays out.
Why India's Outright Payment System Has Its Logic
In India, the dominant model works differently. Labels or producers pay composers, lyricists, and singers a one-time fee in exchange for full ownership of the music rights. The label then collects all downstream revenue. Vaghani acknowledged that this arrangement, while criticised for leaving artistes out of long-term earnings, serves a practical function in the Indian market.
'In our country, it might be really helping people. Because here, in the revenue systems, it takes a lot of time to gather revenue,' he noted. For a newcomer — a first-time music director or a rising singer — waiting months or years for streaming royalties to accumulate is not always viable. The upfront payment offers immediate financial certainty.
The Rise of Revenue Sharing in Independent Music
Vaghani pointed to a shift underway in India's independent music scene, where the Western revenue-sharing model is gaining ground. 'In independent songs right now, we do have a rise in the revenue sharing model. Which is also perfectly fine, because they are adapting to what the West is,' he said.
In this emerging framework, every contributor — regardless of their star power — receives an equal share. Crucially, a viral moment can dramatically accelerate earnings. 'As soon as your song goes viral, that share will keep increasing. You keep doing it for 10 years, 20 years, and you get a collection of these royalties, which amount up to a pretty good amount. You just have to wait. It's not like you get instant results,' Vaghani added.
What This Means for the Broader Music Industry
The debate Vaghani is engaging with sits at the heart of a larger global conversation about fair compensation for music creators. In India, where the recorded music market has expanded rapidly on the back of streaming platforms, the question of who captures long-term value — the label or the artiste — is becoming harder to ignore.
Notably, the Bollywood ecosystem has historically favoured the outright model, partly because the industry's economics were built around film productions that needed to own their soundtracks outright. As music increasingly decouples from films — driven by independent releases and playlist culture — the pressure to revisit compensation structures is likely to grow. How the industry responds will shape the livelihoods of the next generation of Indian music creators.